(bolding mine) Seriously? Videogames as weapons of mass destruction?Malygris said:German Social Affairs Minister Wants WoW Rated "Adults Only"
A recent survey of 44,610 ninth grade students by the KFN, the criminal research institute of Lower Saxony, classified 14,000 of them as addicted to games and another 23,000 more in "serious danger of becoming addicted" - an 83 percent rate of addiction or near-addiction that, at face value, makes videogames among the deadliest and most destructive creations in human history.
game disc shuriken, of course3_of_8 said:Well, weapons are a different thing, though. I agree that not everyone who owns a gun goes shooting people, in fact, only a very small percentage of them will. But you can kill people with a gun. You can't kill them with a video game. (Well, yes, you could, but it would be somewhat bizarre)
The irony is even deeper than that: the current hypersensitivity over there with respect to violence and national conduct is based as much as anything on the guilt/atonement facet of the culture or "Vergangenheitsbewältigung": coming to terms with the past. Any kind of violence is SRS BSNS to an extent to anyone politically correct, far more so than other places. In other words, the effort to distance themselves from any kind of violence, militant nationalism, rabble-rousing, and so on has some ironic side effects.MaxTheReaper said:You idiots. Way to draw similarities between yourselves and Nazi Germany. "Anything we don't like needs to be banned!"Malygris said:"The time for excuses is over," he said. "We need web filtering by the ISPs to operate."
Not in Germany, ratings are legally binding here. We don't have an "AO" rating though but we have three degrees of 18 ratings so talking about AO is somewhere between ambiguous and pointless here. The regular "no clearance for minors" (18) rating means almost nothing, every second major game gets that rating and is sold normally. The "rating refused" is more serious, console makers refuse games like that. Then there's "youth endangering" which can only be declared for a game that was found "rating refused" or not rated at all which bans all advertising which includes placement on a shelf outside of an 18-only store. Usually stores won't even sell those because what can't go on the shelves can't sell that well.MaxTheReaper said:I don't think it should be rated AO. As a matter of fact, I disagree with ratings in general. They're just guidelines, not laws. You can't measure the individual maturity of everyone who plays games, so they make a bit of sense in lieu of a better system.
What I fail to see is how people seem to think gaming is THE reason for it, It just a coincidence, and I just see this as stupidity at it?s finest.Zetona said:The problem is that there are some people that can't, but are still allowed to play games. These are the people who shoot up schools and the like after playing Counter-Strike. By bringing the law down upon all video games, they ruin the fun for the rest of us. Rather than ban the games, inform the parents and make sure they can identify troublesome behavior in their children.McCa said:Yeh, Im 15 I play Gears Of War so I'm Obvs Going to go crazy and kill everyone.
My god get a grip people we can tell the differnce between real and games