Yes, it is an ad, but it poses an interesting question. There is an interesting discussion in there but I will not elaborate on it in this first post as it would somewhat diminish the impact of the vid.
You've summed up all my thoughts on this video.Hero in a half shell said:That was extremely moving. I first was struck with the realisation of how powerful and emotional a simple invitation to hug can be, breaking down the cold landscape of a modern city street, which although full of people and shoppers and seemingly life is a completely impersonal place, of people regarding each other with suspicion and imdifference, but once they realised what the person wanted, just a stupid hug, people suddenly became so receptive and open, and they were so happy to have someone to hug.
And then at the end, to see that the person in the suit had a physical handicap, and how would we percieve them if we saw them in the same place without the funny suit? if he had his arms open would we be as quick to hug him? Suspicion and prejudice would take over, maybe with pity for his "condition", but I know that I would almost certainly keep my distance, and dismiss him as soon as possible from my mind. Certainly has made me think, thanks for this.
Anything, or anyone, not conforming to the norm, i.e being normal, is somehow per definition abnormal, with all the ugly connotations that single word carries. There is this pervasive pressure to conform, e.g 2,4 kids, white picket fence etc, and any deviations shatters this, false, picture of "perfection". So if that is false, what other "truths" out there could turn out to be false? Hence, I believe, the fathers apologetic behaviour. Society has conditioned him to apologize for, somehow, raining on the parade of the normal people. As you said, it sucks, but I get him. I see where he is coming from.GrizzlerBorno said:He sounded guilty of his son's disability and felt the need to explain himself.
It is not so much about the hug, it is about people avoiding disabled people like they were contagious or something. I am sure you have seen it, disabled out in the public space, on a bus, on the subway, at an eatery, at the mall, etc, there seems to be this invisible bubble around them that seems to repel people. That is what this is about.-Drifter- said:...hug...
I do too, but I still don't think he should find the need to apologize for something that is not in any way either his, or his son's, fault. That's not what apologies are for.Logarithmic Limbo said:Anything, or anyone, not conforming to the norm, i.e being normal, is somehow per definition abnormal, with all the ugly connotations that single word carries. There is this pervasive pressure to conform, e.g 2,4 kids, white picket fence etc, and any deviations shatters this, false, picture of "perfection". So if that is false, what other "truths" out there could turn out to be false? Hence, I believe, the fathers apologetic behavior. Society has conditioned him to apologize for, somehow, raining on the parade of the normal people. As you said, it sucks, but I get him. I see where he is coming from.GrizzlerBorno said:He sounded guilty of his son's disability and felt the need to explain himself.