cthulhumythos said:
Zaik said:
I don't get it.
They're using a mechanical recreation of a snake driven extinct by a natural climate change(most likely downwards no less, given the animal is cold blooded) of 6-8 degrees about 58 to 60 million years ago to convince people that a climate change of 1 degree in the past 100 years is immediately life threatening and artificial.
Maybe I just don't get it, but this sounds like they just scammed some rich eco-nutjob into funding their making a giant robot snake just for the hell of it.
they convince people that a climate change of 1 degree in the past 100 years is immediately life threatening and artificial by making a gigantic life-threatening artificial snake. duh.
but i have to agree, it is totally awesome, but what does it do about climate change.
...
This is going to take a while...
Lets's see where to start:
What they might be trying to say is that, say, our current society is the 50-foot, extinct snake, and America's dependacy on oil is the temperature. If America wasn't recieving fuel constantly, or if the snake didn't constantly have the correct outside temperature, America would grind to a halt pretty quickly. Now, in this metaphor, the other countries would be different species capable of surviving in the new temperatures, right? Wrong! They are the other snakes. Let's say America accounts for about half the snake population, and the snake population stands for the world economy. A drastic climate change in one part of the metaphorical world wipes out the America snake population, but will the other snakes be affected? Of course, because speaking for both metaphorical worlds, America is in a cushioned zone of the oil economy/temperature, meaning that it has enough money/is in the right place that the temperature changes will affect it last. So, what I'm saying that they are saying, is that we need to use less oil, or a severe outage will wipe us all out.
Please respond, I think I might've missed something...