I have to say, I think we've a way to go, but with characters such as Half Life's Alyx being so popular, we're headed in the right direction, and also, there's a place for stupidly over the top characters still in both directions.
I do have firefox, but I screwed up the spelling of the word so horribly!Eggo post=9.71383.796049 said:It's spelled exaggerated.
Download and use Firefox.
It has a spellchecker :]
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/
He didn't. The firms generally accept that the average gamer is a male betweem 12 and 36. They make games to pander for the lower end of that, hence the "OMIGOSH BEWBS". It's the industrys stereotype not his.Joeshie post=9.71383.796294 said:For someone who is so against stereotypes, you sure had no problem stereotyping 12-36 year old males there.Eggo post=9.71383.795990 said:Why should anyone accept developers and publishers pandering to the pathetic and juvenile tastes of lonely 12-36 year old males?
It's a stereotype nonetheless, you have to see the irony in saying that 'Girl Gamers' are stereotyped in games yet stereotyping the very people that play them because, OMG, not everyone is a 12-36 year male gamer. It's not okay to generalize "girl gamers" yet it's perfectly fine to stereotype the people that play them? As some people in this thread would say "that's not fair!"Phoenix Arrow post=9.71383.798935 said:He didn't. The firms generally accept that the average gamer is a male betweem 12 and 36. They make games to pander for the lower end of that, hence the "OMIGOSH BEWBS". It's the industrys stereotype not his.Joeshie post=9.71383.796294 said:For someone who is so against stereotypes, you sure had no problem stereotyping 12-36 year old males there.Eggo post=9.71383.795990 said:Why should anyone accept developers and publishers pandering to the pathetic and juvenile tastes of lonely 12-36 year old males?
I know. But I think he was talking from a publishers standpoint. We all know girls play games, but the publishers don't recognise them as a demographic. Or at least that's how it seems to me.Jumplion post=9.71383.798969 said:It's a stereotype nonetheless, you have to see the irony in saying that 'Girl Gamers' are stereotyped in games yet stereotyping the very people that play them because, OMG, not everyone is a 12-36 year male gamer. It's not okay to generalize "girl gamers" yet it's perfectly fine to stereotype the people that play them? As some people in this thread would say "that's not fair!"Phoenix Arrow post=9.71383.798935 said:He didn't. The firms generally accept that the average gamer is a male betweem 12 and 36. They make games to pander for the lower end of that, hence the "OMIGOSH BEWBS". It's the industrys stereotype not his.Joeshie post=9.71383.796294 said:For someone who is so against stereotypes, you sure had no problem stereotyping 12-36 year old males there.Eggo post=9.71383.795990 said:Why should anyone accept developers and publishers pandering to the pathetic and juvenile tastes of lonely 12-36 year old males?
It wasn't the industry I was refering to, it was you yourself.Eggo post=9.71383.799280 said:How is it ironic to want the industry to stop blindly stereotyping both male (in terms of who they are marketing to) and female gamers (in terms of what they're marketing)?Jumplion post=9.71383.798969 said:It's a stereotype nonetheless, you have to see the irony in saying that 'Girl Gamers' are stereotyped in games yet stereotyping the very people that play them because, OMG, not everyone is a 12-36 year male gamer. It's not okay to generalize "girl gamers" yet it's perfectly fine to stereotype the people that play them? As some people in this thread would say "that's not fair!"