One more point tangentially-related to the article. So we've had at least two major films on recent African history in the last couple of years: Last King of Scotland about Ugandan dictator Idi Amin, and now Invictus about Nelson Mandela. In both cases, apparently the lives of the two men in question are not compelling enough to fill out a two hour movie unless there's also a white co-star grabbing half the screen time.
Maybe I'll forgive Last King since it's based on a successful novel, and a biopic of Amin would probably never have been made without that connection. But you're telling me Mandela's life doesn't have enough material for a two hour movie, that you have to sidecar it to the story of a rag-tag team of misfits winning the championship? And we're getting this from Clint Eastwood and Morgan Freeman! I just shake my head at that one.
Maybe I'll forgive Last King since it's based on a successful novel, and a biopic of Amin would probably never have been made without that connection. But you're telling me Mandela's life doesn't have enough material for a two hour movie, that you have to sidecar it to the story of a rag-tag team of misfits winning the championship? And we're getting this from Clint Eastwood and Morgan Freeman! I just shake my head at that one.