Going Up! Canadian Company Granted U.S. Patent For A Space Elevator

Draconalis

Elite Member
Sep 11, 2008
1,586
0
41
Zontar said:
A tsunami can be generated by ANY disturbance that displaces a large water mass from its equilibrium position. Submarine landslides, which often occur during a large earthquake, can also create a tsunami. During a submarine landslide, the equilibrium sea-level is altered by sediment moving along the sea-floor. Gravitational forces then propagate the tsunami given the initial perturbation of the sea-level. Similarly, a violent marine volcanic eruption can create an impulsive force that displaces the water column and generates a tsunami. Above water (subarial) landslides and space born objects can disturb the water from above the surface. The falling debris displaces the water from its equilibrium position and produces a tsunami.
More than just seismic activity will create a tsunami, however:

Unlike ocean-wide tsunamis caused by some earthquakes, tsunamis generated by non-seismic mechanisms usually dissipate quickly and rarely affect coastlines far from the source area.
This, I did not know. I still wonder though, how much water would be displaced by the falling elevator.


source:
http://wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/?page=tsunami_science
 

Sarge034

New member
Feb 24, 2011
1,623
0
0
The_Great_Galendo said:
I thought one of the requirements for a patent was a working prototype. This just shows how friggin' broken the U.S. patent office/system is.

...of course, if they actually build it, and it works, I'll gladly eat my words. But at first blush this seems like yet another company that's going to sit on a patent that it can't really use and doesn't really deserve just so that if someone else actually gets the job done, they can sue them for millions.
There is at least one patent, perhaps more, for a time travel machine.

OT- Cool story bro, but you folks should probably build a place for this elevator to take me first... XD
 

Batou667

New member
Oct 5, 2011
2,238
0
0
Draconalis said:
I still wonder though, how much water would be displaced by the falling elevator.
They'd be using the most lightweight materials possible to build the elevator, so actually I don't think it would have as much kinetic energy as you might think if it fell. It'd be a disaster for the agency or country who owned the elevator, but from a environmental point of view it'd be fairly negligible. Orders of magnitude less energy than a decent hurricane or earthquake, certainly.

Anyway, I thought the best current bet for sending things into space without relying on rocketry was some kind of kinetic slingshot system?
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,836
0
0
FogHornG36 said:
The only thing other then books that i can think of that has a space elevator was one episode of star trek voyager called "Rise". Was a bad episode mostly because of Neelix.
Here, have another! [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1F1YyDPZLX8]

OT: Yay, Canada science! :D
 

mad825

New member
Mar 28, 2010
3,379
0
0
Zontar said:
9/11 isn't going to happen again, it only happened at all because it was inconceivable at the time and everyone thought a hijacking would lead to hostage taking with demands for money, defection or prisoner releases. A hijacking of a plane is virtually impossible in the post-9/11 world.
Yes, after 40 years of hijackings becoming prevalent by terrorist it wasn't until 9/11 solved all the problems. 9/11 happened because they couldn't ID the hijacked planes in time for the military jets to shoot them down.
 

Zontar

Mad Max 2019
Feb 18, 2013
4,931
0
0
mad825 said:
Zontar said:
9/11 isn't going to happen again, it only happened at all because it was inconceivable at the time and everyone thought a hijacking would lead to hostage taking with demands for money, defection or prisoner releases. A hijacking of a plane is virtually impossible in the post-9/11 world.
Yes, after 40 years of hijackings becoming prevalent by terrorist it wasn't until 9/11 solved all the problems. 9/11 happened because they couldn't ID the hijacked planes in time for the military jets to shoot them down.
Shooting them down as an acceptable response is a post-9/11 idea even if the military always had it on the table. Hijackings in that 40 year period where exclusively in the form of terrorists trying to get ransoms, prisoners released, getting to a location or a combination there of, and the M.O. for militarise when dealing with this was to wait until the inevitable landing and then take out in the way only the military or a SWAT team can. People didn't resist on the first three planes because to be frank the idea that someone would fly them into a building was just not in anyone's head until after it had actually happened.

Even ignoring security measures which have been added over the years after that event, a 9/11 like hijacking, or a cold war communist or contra one as well, is pretty much never going to happen again due to the new way we as a society perceive such an action. Instead of it being one where we think passively going along with it will virtually guarantee our survival no matter what the outcome (as was the case with pre-9/11 hijackings) now the perception is that no matter what the risk is of resisting, it's better odds then letting them have their way.

This is something terrorists are aware of, and is the reason why now they try to bomb planes instead of taking them over.
 

Ukomba

New member
Oct 14, 2010
1,528
0
0
Canada is at a very bad latitude for this. The Galapagos islands would be a great location.
 

Pinky's Brain

New member
Mar 2, 2011
290
0
0
I think the orbital airship makes more sense, don't bother with an elevator structure in the lower atmosphere ... just use a blimp to fly your cargo/rockets/etc to your lighter than air station.
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
So, I get that this is an inflated tower but what would happen if a rigid structure was built around it and then the base destroyed? Would it fall? I assume so. Would it behave like dropping a rod from space would from that height (a massive explosion) or what? I guess the idea is that it is more like a pendulum hanging away from the earth thanks to the counterweight rather than a structure that is standing on earth. But surely if the base of the structure is destroyed then its orbit would decay very rapidly and fall to earth just like anything else.

I'm partially interested in what could go wrong. Still mostly excited for its uses but what's the worst case scenario? What kind of pressures would it have to survive? I mean, even pushing off of it from space would cause far more pressure than people might with the top of it being nearly weightless despite having all that mass connected to parts that are fully weighted.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,148
3,890
118
Batou667 said:
Anyway, I thought the best current bet for sending things into space without relying on rocketry was some kind of kinetic slingshot system?
Even if such a thing was feasible (may or may not be, I have no idea), the G forces would kill people and sensitive equipment.

mad825 said:
Yes, after 40 years of hijackings becoming prevalent by terrorist it wasn't until 9/11 solved all the problems. 9/11 happened because they couldn't ID the hijacked planes in time for the military jets to shoot them down.
There was also an impressive amount of mistakes made by US government agencies. If they'd been on the ball, hell even if they just followed their procedures right away instead of dithering, it likely would not have happened.

Of course, if they had shot the planes down, 9/11 would be remembered as the day the USAF shot down civilian planes in US airspace because of some plan some terrorist group nobody had heard of had to destroy the WTC. It would have seemed ludicrous to very many people if it hadn't actually happened.
 

KouDy

New member
Dec 31, 2010
24
0
0
Thinking about the movies with space elevator featured in them but not too many i guess. The only fiction coming tomind is EVE Empyrean Age book. Not on earth but space elevator nontheless. Warhammer 40k universe probably has them as well but still no movie.
 

Glaice

New member
Mar 18, 2013
577
0
0
My questions would be how would you maintain such a thing and how would you protect it from space junk and micrometeorites?