AceDiamond said:
I'm not dressing it up, nothing in their release said specifically that they were done for as a company. I get that they misled people but they misled through omission and deception and all we had to do was fill in the blanks which we did. I think you're just a little too mad about being played for a fool instead of just dealing with it and moving on.
Yeah, I'm totally mad about being duped, despite having found out about this story
after the fact. Nice try.
Quick question: you go out of town on a business trip, leaving your girlfriend behind. She blows your best friend while you're gone, and when you return, she tells you that she hasn't had intercourse with anyone. A year later, after you've gotten married and paid for pretty much everything of hers, you find out she blew your best friend. You're not going to hold it against her, right? I mean, it
is your fault for filling in the blank incorrectly, because she was only
misleading you by omitting the fact that she was giving head to your buddy. You can be mad about the fact that she cheated on you, sure, but you can't really get mad about all the time and money you continued to invest in her, because she never technically lied, right? Well, you sure wouldn't be mad if we applied the same logic you're trying to use in this stupid argument. Somehow, I get the feeling we'd observe some major discrepancies between what you're saying now, and what you'd do in that situation.
In other words, stop trying to win internet arguments via hypocrisy, because this is clearly more about you wanting to "win" than to make a valid point.
Akalabeth said:
Well, no
shit advertising is misleading, but when it directly parallels a 13-year-old girl leaving a vague suicide note on myspace for attention, it becomes pathetic.