Roxor said:
150k Euros as the maximum possible fine for breach of privacy? That might be reasonable if you're fining an individual who makes 50k a year, but it's nothing for a company like Google.
Change the law so it's three times the guilty party's annual income and we might actually see some results.
sad reality is - they wont change. there was a company here that sold plastic food bags. turns out, they were made our of poisonous plastic and would contamiante any warm food they came in contact with (it would literally melt-leak into food). the company was told to stop, they didnt. so they got fined. paid fine and didnt stop. they got fined 3 times, after that they made a sale and still sold all of the bags. later in the interview when asked why they didnt stop selling them and kept getting fined they said it was more profitable for them to pay the fine than pull the product.
meanwhile, you get to pay 20.000 dollars for every song you download/watch on youtube, becaus copyright is obviuosly more important than health hazzard.
Dogstile said:
Where I work, if someone wants to google something they still type in google.com first. Old habits die hard i guess
sad but true to a lot of people. there is also the thing that this doesnt actually work on IE which a lot of people sadly still use.
There are even worse offenders though, i remember i asked people to download something and gave them the exactly link to a file hosted. so instead of typing it to adress bar they typed it into google and complained that they cant find it since google didnt index the link that was only few hours old. i had to tell that person to type it in adress bar on
4 seperate occasions till she finally got it.
thisbymaster said:
Complete bullshit, Google should have just gone dark in France for two days. Mainly because the privacy laws in Europe are completely nuts.
google would then be fined for the riots that ensue during that time.
O maestre said:
proud too be a European, almost makes me wish I was French. Google needs to be defamed for turning evil so rapidly, and it's monopoly dismantled. The average consumer has no idea what is going on behind the scenes and are very easily lulled into habits.
You dont want to be the hypocrite french that does this on one day and then passes laws that allows the government to legally install spyware in every computer in france to ensure they dont "have sensitive material".
Furism said:
If a people magazine is condemned for invasion of privacy of a celebrity, they have to display a full page in their next edition to state so. It's good on paper, but unfortunately in reality people don't seem to care an continue to buy the magazine
Maybe they continue to buy the magazine because it was the celebrity's private life that attracted them there in the first place?