You are misinformed.DTWolfwood said:Hurting your shareholders bottomline is never a smart thing. As a share holder of Google i dont care if they had to censor themselves in china! so long as they are getting business from them. Since when does a search engine require 'credibility' to be good? oODanzaivar said:Google is number one pretty much everywhere but China, the biggest stain on its rep was agreeing to censor stuff for the Chinese Government. They lose out on a market they have a small share in, and gain massive credibility everywhere else; seems a pretty smart move to me.
while i admire there courage to stand up for there beliefs, it doesnt take an expert to see this as a fiscal blunder especially since china is probably the fastest growing market. So either this politically motivated ploy will guarantee more business in the free world or they would have shot themselves in the foot when some other company make crazy money off them.
all i know is time to sell some google!
This is exactly right. Google needs to retain its credibility to stay in business, I personally think it saw that it was at risk of being pulled into some nasty Chinese crackdown and decided it would be best not to be involved. Better to take a hit in one market than risk the public image of the whole company in the event that the Chinese Government uses them to commit horrible acts against dissidents etc.ark123 said:You are misinformed.DTWolfwood said:Hurting your shareholders bottomline is never a smart thing. As a share holder of Google i dont care if they had to censor themselves in china! so long as they are getting business from them. Since when does a search engine require 'credibility' to be good? oODanzaivar said:Google is number one pretty much everywhere but China, the biggest stain on its rep was agreeing to censor stuff for the Chinese Government. They lose out on a market they have a small share in, and gain massive credibility everywhere else; seems a pretty smart move to me.
while i admire there courage to stand up for there beliefs, it doesnt take an expert to see this as a fiscal blunder especially since china is probably the fastest growing market. So either this politically motivated ploy will guarantee more business in the free world or they would have shot themselves in the foot when some other company make crazy money off them.
all i know is time to sell some google!
The real REAL reason Big G is pulling out of China is that their government has a team of hackers that have managed to infiltrate gmail servers and extract information about dissidents, but the notion that a search engine doesn't necessarily have to actually find what you're looking for is stupid.
Google has 90% of the European market and around 70% of America. They're about 30% in China. They're not losing a whole lot by taking this stance if you consider the PR holocaust that would happen if it was proven beyond reasonable doubt that dissidents were found and executed because of information pulled from gmail accounts. ALL google has is their public image. They sell advertising, so they depend on loyalty.
Now if only they'd do the same to Warner Music Group, Viacom and so forth constantly getting stuff pulled/blocked on YouTube. Still I'm glad they're not going the Rupert Murdoch route and kowtowing to China anymore.Arcane Azmadi said:Got to love Google for this. They took a lot of stick for caving into China for easily before, I'm glad to see they had the courage to admit they were wrong and cease bending to the whims of the blatantly corrupt Chinese government.
Pretty much ever since there was more than one of them and they had to start competing with each other? In general, the search engines that don't have "credibility" (i.e. people don't trust them/their results) haven't been particularly successful. In the long run, censored results and things like paid ad placement in search results (as opposed to clearly marked ads that are separate) have driven people away from companies that have tried to pull things like that and to their competitors.DTWolfwood said:Since when does a search engine require 'credibility' to be good?
If you cannot abide by your own rules and morals, then you have nothing.DTWolfwood said:Hurting your shareholders bottomline is never a smart thing. As a share holder of Google i dont care if they had to censor themselves in china! so long as they are getting business from them. Since when does a search engine require 'credibility' to be good? oODanzaivar said:Google is number one pretty much everywhere but China, the biggest stain on its rep was agreeing to censor stuff for the Chinese Government. They lose out on a market they have a small share in, and gain massive credibility everywhere else; seems a pretty smart move to me.
while i admire there courage to stand up for there beliefs, it doesnt take an expert to see this as a fiscal blunder especially since china is probably the fastest growing market. So either this politically motivated ploy will guarantee more business in the free world or they would have shot themselves in the foot when some other company make crazy money off them.
all i know is time to sell some google!
Good for Google. I just wish more companies would follow their example. There are some more important things than just profit in the world.Vaccine said:Google should make a Liberty Prime irl.
Agreed. Anyway, Google may suffer for this, but more power to them.PayJ567 said:I instantly think of this: