It's on the internet, it's there forever LEARN THE LESSON! So many people fail to get such an easy lesson.
Google Removing Search Results to Jennifer Lawrence's Nude Photos
- Thread starter roseofbattle
- Start date
CENSORSHIP!
In all reality though, probably a wise idea. Everyone and their grandmother who wanted to see them probably has by now. I still feel like I'm the minority for not having looked at them yet.
In all reality though, probably a wise idea. Everyone and their grandmother who wanted to see them probably has by now. I still feel like I'm the minority for not having looked at them yet.
1st - these pics were on the net for a while. The people who wanted them most already have them.
2nd - At this point, wouldn't you want to move on from this incident instead of reminding people you have nude photos that leaked online?
3rd - You're still the idiot who put faith in iCloud to store private documents when you should know full well that ANYTHING stored on any digital component or storage space requiring internet connection to access can EASILY be hacked. If you didn't want your nude photos to ever get out, then you keep hard copies at home locked away and don't store them on iCloud or even on your harddrive.
4th - I'm surprised how much sway Lawrence has over google to push them into doing this. That or she has more free time than other famous people to waste in dealing with this... which leads me back to my third point.
2nd - At this point, wouldn't you want to move on from this incident instead of reminding people you have nude photos that leaked online?
3rd - You're still the idiot who put faith in iCloud to store private documents when you should know full well that ANYTHING stored on any digital component or storage space requiring internet connection to access can EASILY be hacked. If you didn't want your nude photos to ever get out, then you keep hard copies at home locked away and don't store them on iCloud or even on your harddrive.
4th - I'm surprised how much sway Lawrence has over google to push them into doing this. That or she has more free time than other famous people to waste in dealing with this... which leads me back to my third point.
This whole j-law fiasco was just horrible. The only honorable thing left to do is to send all the pictures back to her to get them off the internet. If any of you downloaded the pictures, please email them to her directly so that she will be able to delete that file. If we all chip in, we'll be able to return every copy of her stolen images.
Don't post anything on the internet you wouldn't want others to see. That is the number one rule to file-sharing and file-hosting. She broke that rule. I feel no pity for her or any of the other women whose pictures were leaked. There is no reason to take photos of yourself anyway - the only reason to do that would to be for pornography. If you actually cared about your loved one you would do it in person (they would enjoy it much more).
Sorry, Jennifer. Attempting to sue Google for your mistake does not earn you any brownie points with me.
Sorry, Jennifer. Attempting to sue Google for your mistake does not earn you any brownie points with me.
Interesting. So if an angry ex-girlfriend steals and posts embarrassing photos of me on the internet, do I get to sue for $100 million and demand that one of the largest companies on the planet do whatever it can to get rid of the pictures, even though they aren't actually hosting the photos?
Wait... but if Google removes search results to the photos, then how will people find them? Will they have to use Bing?
the way it works is that some corporate layer company registered god knows where with untracable adress sends google an email with DMCA takedown, which includes thousands (literally) adresses in a single notice, claiming to represent interests of ALL of that content owners. according to current laws, google MUST take those links down regardless of whether the DMCA was filled legally or not and it is almost impossible to counter. You litterally have to sue that nontracable company to get your site off the blacklist because somone in hollywood didnt like your review and decided to play the DMCA game. The system is beyond broken.thaluikhain said:
It takes weeks back and forth with google legal rep to even get to see your own takedown notice. forget about publicising it (even though they are legally to be public).Schadrach said:
Thats not how it works. remmeber when Paypal got hacked due to flaw in their security? They sued the hackers for amount that cost them to upgrade their security and won the court case. if anything apple will sue others for having to spend money on increasing their security. because laws are logical right?Abomination said:
can you hire layers that can afford to make false sue claims and crush anyone that points out its illegal? if so, yes, you can.Ihateregistering1 said:
Thats it guys, 2012 may be late but apocalypse is starting!144 said:
The thing is that the people who put their funds/accounts on Paypal did so willingly. The whole thing about the photos on the Cloud is that people did NOT know their images were being uploaded there.Strazdas said:
I think there's grounds there for negligence, even if they were hacked. Of course the hackers should be held accountable for the activity, but it seems that trail has grown cold.
Oh it won't stop the internet, there are other search engines but it will stop probably 70% of the people casually interested in her nudes. Its a step I guess.
All these people who put data they want no one else to see, on a server, and then get mad when something bad happens. Is there anyone who needs an explanation of the total and dimwitted irony of that? Also, Google is hardly the only search engine. And who cares, as there are much better looking women than Jennifer Lawrence happy to provide much better pictures for anyone who wants them. Little Miss Pouty Archer should get over herself.
Ooo, I'm a muckraker now. I like that!
Ooo, I'm a muckraker now. I like that!