Paulhorne Schillings said:
Snipped, just for pratical reasons.
That would be something to consider if anyone cared about me. I'm just a young 20-something-year-old who just fucks around, literally and figuratively. I assure you that no one gives a shit about my life.
Well fine then.
Then post your data here. Full name. Home address. Cell number. E-mail address. Where you work or study. The name of your closest relatives and people you care about. The names of the last 3 people you "fucked around" with, and their home addresses. And three or four places that you usually go in your spare time. And how much money you make? If you don't want to say the specific number, then share your shopping habits. The last 10 things you bought might give us a good idea.
I don't give a shit about your life, nor absolutely anyone from this forums I presume... So, yeah. Prove your point.[/quote]
Okay, let me break down the fallacy of your post:
Likelihood of people at Google to fuck around with Gamer KT: Unlikely. They may be a megaconglomerate but they like wasting money on not releasing Google Glass instead of doing anything legitimately antagonistic with the personal data of one of literally BILLIONS of users.
Likelihood of US Security Agencies to fuck around with Gamer KT: Unlikely, given that US security agencies are more preoccupied with ISIL cutting someone's head off, posting the video of it on the internet and threatening to cut another innocent man's head off than people who want to talk on geek forums about fuck all that relates to dismantling international and external threats.
Likelihood of anyone with an internet connection to fuck around with Gamer KT, especially after he would post his IRL info to prove a point: Unknown.
http://im.ezgif.com/tmp/gif_write_b42fca.gif
See, the slippry slope fallacy is "well, if one person will/does/did, then EVERYONE WILL!", applied by you in that "well, if you don't give a shit about Google/US Security agencies having access to your personal info, then you don't give a shit about ANYONE having access to your personal info!" See? Slippery slope.[/quote]
It was not a fallacy. It was an exaggeration to disprove a point which I think is the real fallacy.
People love that argument of "hey, nobody cares about me. I have nothing to hide". See, THAT?S a fallacy.
See, protecting personal information is something that seems irrelevant. Until it is not. Only when you see the pratical effect of the information that has been gathered about you is the moment that it gets scary.
Only when it gets uncomfortable is that you think "hmmm, maybe I should have worried about it".
To give a quick example off the top of my head, there are stories about people that got rejected on job interviews because of their activities in social networks.
People nowadays are getting more and more worried about their digital footprint, and that IS something to be worried about. It will only get worse, as information becomes more intricate in our lives.
And lastly. So, Google and/or the government are less likely to abuse your gathered information than "random people from the web". Well, I guess you trust them a lot with that information.
I bet every piece data I mentioned in my "fallacy" can be easily obtained by someone with TOTAL access of your smartphone. But hey, it?s safe with Google.
Except Google could be hacked. Could go bankrupt. Could be bought by other company. Could be subject to changes in its directorial board, and the new board think that they should sell this valuable personal information to the highest bidder. Could be obliged, by law, to give access to that information to governmental agencies.
You don?t HAVE to be paranoid. You don?t need to always think about the worst case scenario. I, personally, don?t think it will ever come to that. But it is best to acknowledge that it is indeed possible. And be just a little cautious.
So, to me "I am no one, screw my personal data" is an stupid argument and the real fallacy.