Government Tries to Block Expert Testimony in Mod Chip Case

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Government Tries to Block Expert Testimony in Mod Chip Case


Prosecutors in the case of a man charged with violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act by modding Xbox 360s are trying to block the testimony of "celebrity geek" Andrew "Bunnie" Huang, the author of the 2003 book Hacking the Xbox: An Introduction to Reverse Engineering [http://www.amazon.com/Hacking-Xbox-Introduction-Reverse-Engineering/dp/1593270291/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1288036510&sr=8-1].

Matthew Crippen of Anaheim, California, is charged with violating the anti-circumvention regulations in the DMCA after installing mod chips in Xbox 360 consoles for undercover agents belonging to the Entertainment Software Association and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. It's serious business - he faces up to three years in prison if convicted on both counts - and so he's enlisted the help of Chumby [http://www.chumby.com/] designer and "hacking pioneer" Andrew Huang to testify on his behalf.

"Basically, what he did was insufficient on its own to violate anything," Huang said in a recent interview. The DMCA should allow for "fair use" exemptions, he continued, which would allow for the installation of mod chips in consoles for legitimate purposes. He also pointed out that the U.S. Copyright Office recently legalized jailbreaking cellphones and said that consoles should get the same treatment.

"The bottom line, I would like to see the scope of the DMCA limited to an appropriate statute that respects fair use, one that respects traditional rights," he added.

But prosecutors are doing their best to block Huang from testifying, arguing that his opinions are not legally admissible and that the "continual reliance on 'fair use' as a defense" is irrelevant because circumvention is prohibited by the DMCA regardless of the reason. The judge in the case has yet to rule on the matter.

Three years in prison for installing mod chips in game consoles is an absolute obscenity and iPhone jailbreaking [http://www.eff.org/], apparently nobody thought to ask about game consoles. Now we have to wait another couple of years until the process comes around again. "This is why the DMCA process, it's a pretty inefficient way to think of how the law should be," Cohn said.

Crippen's trial is scheduled to begin on November 30.

Source: Ars Technica [http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2010/10/prosecutors-seek-to-block-xbox-hacking-pioneer-from-mod-chip-trial.ars?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss]


Permalink
 

Azmael Silverlance

Pirate Warlord!
Oct 20, 2009
756
0
0
after installing mod chips in Xbox 360 consoles for undercover agents belonging to the Entertainment Software Association and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

So....he helped the government and then the government fucked him up? :O o_O im confused....why is everybody ignoring the fact WHO he modded for!
 

Brotherofwill

New member
Jan 25, 2009
2,566
0
0
3 years for installing a chip in a console? What? How is that even relatable to other crimes that put you in prison?

Ridiculous. Did he sell them and make profit? Probably not, so this is simply a waste of everyone's time.
bjj hero said:
land of the free...
lolwut Hardly :D
 

llafnwod

New member
Nov 9, 2007
426
0
0
Azmael Silverlance said:
after installing mod chips in Xbox 360 consoles for undercover agents belonging to the Entertainment Software Association and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

So....he helped the government and then the government fucked him up? :O o_O im confused....why is everybody ignoring the fact WHO he modded for!
It was a sting...
 

Spacewolf

New member
May 21, 2008
1,232
0
0
and whats the chance of him getting the maximum sentence and unlike the iphone what other reasons could you have for "jailbreaking" a 360
 

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,847
0
0
I have to agree with the prosecution that Huang's testimony is irrelevant. If it's against the law, it's against the law. And "it shouldn't be against the law" isn't really a defense. It's not the job of that court to change the law anyway, it's just to hear the case based on what the law currently is and decide if the defendant did indeed break it. The sentence is ridiculous though, the defendant should try to get a reduced sentence by pleading guilty instead of trying that pointless "but it shouldn't be a crime!" defense.
 

samsonguy920

New member
Mar 24, 2009
2,921
0
0
I really hope Matt Crippen has more in his lineup than a "celebrity" expert. It isn't so much a case as the Prosecutors worried about what he will say as it will just be a waste of the court's time.
It would pay to keep an eye on how this case goes, as it could set a precedent on modding consoles if for some universal unknowing reason Crippen actually gets acquitted.

He already failed in the "Don't get caught" rule. Now we see whether he fails in the "Don't be a moron in court" rule.
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
So, the government thinks that putting a mod chip into a video game console is as offensive as rape without a deadly weapon.
What?

mjc0961 said:
I have to agree with the prosecution that Huang's testimony is irrelevant. If it's against the law, it's against the law. And "it shouldn't be against the law" isn't really a defense. It's not the job of that court to change the law anyway, it's just to hear the case based on what the law currently is and decide if the defendant did indeed break it. The sentence is ridiculous though, the defendant should try to get a reduced sentence by pleading guilty instead of trying that pointless "but it shouldn't be a crime!" defense.
"It shouldn't be against the law" can be a great defense. That's how a lot of things have been changed. I mean, Brown Vs. Board of Education pretty much used this defense.

I don't know too much about these specific laws, but if it outlaws Fair Use, I'm not liking the sound of it so far.
I'll hold my judgement for further investigation.

While I don't like piracy, and mod chips are a big part in console piracy and cheating, we can't go back on the foundation of our country for the sake of making things fair for a private industry.
 

Ekonk

New member
Apr 21, 2009
3,120
0
0
America has become a danger to democracy and freedom, fellas. Seriously, 3 years for this shit? Enjoy your fucking 'freedom'.
 

hansari

New member
May 31, 2009
1,256
0
0
I'm pretty sure no one would give a damn about people modding their consoles if playing pirated games wasn't an option...
 

Actual

New member
Jun 24, 2008
1,220
0
0
mjc0961 said:
I have to agree with the prosecution that Huang's testimony is irrelevant. If it's against the law, it's against the law. And "it shouldn't be against the law" isn't really a defense. It's not the job of that court to change the law anyway, it's just to hear the case based on what the law currently is and decide if the defendant did indeed break it. The sentence is ridiculous though, the defendant should try to get a reduced sentence by pleading guilty instead of trying that pointless "but it shouldn't be a crime!" defense.
In an ideal word a court should exist to find justice. Imprisonment for a crime that hurts no-one and (possibly) takes a little money out of a corporations pocket is not just.

In this world, I guess you're right. :(
 

ewhac

Digital Spellweaver
Legacy
Escapist +
Sep 2, 2009
575
0
21
San Francisco Peninsula
Country
USA
Andy Chalk said:
Three years in prison for installing mod chips in game consoles is an absolute obscenity and Electronic Freedom Frontier Legal Director Cindy Cohn said the case highlights one of the many flaws in the DMCA... [emphasis mine]
Electronic [em]Frontier Foundation[/em] [http://eff.org/]. Geez. They've only been around for -- what? -- 20 years?
 

Phokal

New member
Oct 12, 2009
60
0
0
mjc0961 said:
I have to agree with the prosecution that Huang's testimony is irrelevant. If it's against the law, it's against the law. And "it shouldn't be against the law" isn't really a defense. It's not the job of that court to change the law anyway, it's just to hear the case based on what the law currently is and decide if the defendant did indeed break it. The sentence is ridiculous though, the defendant should try to get a reduced sentence by pleading guilty instead of trying that pointless "but it shouldn't be a crime!" defense.
Fair Use is also in the law books. So, which should be followed? Fair Use or DMCA? And to expand on the Brown vs. Board of Education example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separate_but_equal