The_root_of_all_evil said:
Pele. Through and through. Talk of the "more demanding" modern game is just talk to big it up.
You imagine playing "the modern game" without astroturf, trainers, sportsdrinks and all the other things brought in to make it softer.
That and how hard the players generally were... (see what I did there... -_- )
No subs, what would now be classified as dangerous tackles, the occasional on pitch punch up, broken bones... PLAY ON!! It's like rugby without the crotch grabbing!
Did anyone watch the latest El Clasico?! Biggest display of gamesmanship ever... eesh.
Guffe said:
My top three
Guess my team!
Everton... XD
razer17 said:
Ryan Giggs purely because he has been able to keep up an amazing level of performance for 20 years straight.
I think as far as pure consistency, 'staying power' (as it were) and adaptability, Giggs does deserve everything he gets (and man he's going to get one
hell of a testimonial when he retires...). As a schoolboy he was a striker, then left-winger and now, he's pretty much effective across the entire midfield. He could've been an SS at a stretch. The question remains: is anyone (else) going to score in 20+ (consecutive and otherwise) EPL seasons (let alone for a single club)??
Soxafloppin said:
George Best, Surprised he hasn't been mentioned.
And speaking of Giggs, Best once quipped "One day, they might even say that I was just another Giggs."
BarnaclePD said:
and personally i can't rate a modern day player till they've played in the English Premier League, Messi against Stoke? he'll be on the floor more than he'll be doing anything.
LAWL! One of my friends keeps asking the question: what would happen in Barcelona vs. Stoke? 1-0, Barcelona with 90% possession and ending the game with 9 or fewer players through 'injury' and Stoke with at least one player sent off and everyone else cautioned.
OT: I'm with everyone else who said it's impossible to answer, because they're just far too many factors that influence the perceived skill and talent of a player.
Typical example regarding team: Andy Carroll... at Newcastle, he was brilliant (to some), typical number nine, got on the end of long balls, bullied centre-backs all day and scored goals. Now, at Liverpool, gets a header marginally wide all game and that's a 'good showing'. Why? The team around him. Liverpool and Newcastle have vastly differing playstyles and Newcastle played
for him, while Liverpool play
with him. Big difference, but he's still a good player, he's just at the wrong club to show it. And Fernando... oh, Fernando...
A players' duration, being able to play at the top level for so long, or internationally for so long... and stats, for those so minded. Era plays a part as well, 'cos I don't think Messi would last long in a 1970's match. Still, I don't think the way Pele plays from then would look that out of place in an EPL line-up today.
Still, no Kaka? -_-