Green Lantern is Gay

Recommended Videos

SnakeoilSage

New member
Sep 20, 2011
1,211
0
0
Way to cop out DC. Just slap the tag on someone who hasn't been part of the core lineup in 60 years or so. Classy.
 

Draskinn

New member
May 22, 2012
8
0
0
Dang my money was on Martian Manhunter... I mean shoot man it's right there in the name! LoL
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
RvLeshrac said:
What's next? Lois catches Superman fucking Jimmy Olsen?


The genuine cover art for a non-parody in-canon Superman Comic. Oh the innocent times. I am afraid I do not have context.

But seriously, you just made a slippery slope argument, a serious one unlike my joke one. You aren't giving any mechanism for how one can lead to another, only how it is apparently an equal step but to an unacceptable place.

Just because We go from A to B doesn't mean we will go from B to C.
 

Dragonpit

New member
Nov 10, 2010
637
0
0
Okay. That works. The Green Lantern Corps is expansive in and of itself, allowing for multiple human mem-I mean...fighters. Anyway, there's easily room in there for a gay character.
 

Fiz_The_Toaster

books, Books, BOOKS
Legacy
Jan 19, 2011
5,496
1
3
Country
United States
Huh, was totally not expecting that, and that's cool, I guess.

I've never liked the Green Lantern so this really does nothing for me to make me care about him more.
 

RvLeshrac

This is a Forum Title.
Oct 2, 2008
662
0
0
Treblaine said:
RvLeshrac said:
What's next? Lois catches Superman fucking Jimmy Olsen?
The genuine cover art for a non-parody in-canon Superman Comic. Oh the innocent times. I am afraid I do not have context.

But seriously, you just made a slippery slope argument, a serious one unlike my joke one. You aren't giving any mechanism for how one can lead to another, only how it is apparently an equal step but to an unacceptable place.

Just because We go from A to B doesn't mean we will go from B to C.
Nope. But, in this specific case, you're altering the genetic make-up of a superhero.

If you want a comic analogy, this is akin to removing Cyclops's eye-beams or Wolverine's healing factor.

Sexuality isn't something you can "alter," this is the wrong message.
 

RvLeshrac

This is a Forum Title.
Oct 2, 2008
662
0
0
Diana Kingston-Gabai said:
RvLeshrac said:
So, why are they changing an established heterosexual character into a homosexual one? There's plenty of room for gay superheroes.
Indeed. You can tell by the plethora of gay superheroes they already have.
The lack of LGBT superheroes is exactly why there's plenty of room for them. You don't walk into a party filled with guys and yell "THIS FEST NEEDS MORE SAUSAGE."

Well, OK, the new Green Lantern might.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
RvLeshrac said:
Treblaine said:
RvLeshrac said:
What's next? Lois catches Superman fucking Jimmy Olsen?
The genuine cover art for a non-parody in-canon Superman Comic. Oh the innocent times. I am afraid I do not have context.

But seriously, you just made a slippery slope argument, a serious one unlike my joke one. You aren't giving any mechanism for how one can lead to another, only how it is apparently an equal step but to an unacceptable place.

Just because We go from A to B doesn't mean we will go from B to C.
Nope. But, in this specific case, you're altering the genetic make-up of a superhero.

If you want a comic analogy, this is akin to removing Cyclops's eye-beams or Wolverine's healing factor.

Sexuality isn't something you can "alter," this is the wrong message.
You do realise that it's a different character who is taking up the Green Lantern mantle?

This is more akin to Scott Summers dying or retiring and a completely different character adopting the title "Cyclops" who had the same superpowers but also has a preference for macho men.

Sexuality isn't altered.
 

MorganL4

Person
May 1, 2008
1,360
0
0
Kelethor said:
huh....thought for sure it was flash.
I knew it wasn't going to be Flash, or Jordan because in the new JL comic books those two argue over who gets to hit on Wonder Woman, so that was a foregone conclusion.


What I want to know, is how are they gonna explain Jade: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jade_%28comics%29


If he is not "recently gay" that would imply that he was always out of the closet, so somewhere along the line, either artificial insemination happened, or Thorn ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_and_Thorn ) knowing married a gay man. ( which is weird)
 

The Great JT

New member
Oct 6, 2008
3,720
0
0
Well, I was half-right (in terms of names), I said it was Green Arrow.

Still, this does feel like kind of a cop-out, since it's not one of their big seven (Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Martian Manhunter, Green Lantern (Hal Jordan), Aquaman, Flash) but this is the kind of thing reboots are supposed to do, re-interpret things and do things differently.

Now that doesn't mean all re-inventions in the relaunch have been good, I mean look at how Starfire's being portrayed post-reboot.
 

notyouraveragejoe

Dehakchakala!
Nov 8, 2008
1,446
0
0
I'm glad that they made it a big (albeit not in the most well-known incarnation) superhero. Also, my favourite general character (Green Lantern, as in not a specific Green Lantern) now has even more diversity in the Corps. Awesome!
 

Crazy Zaul

New member
Oct 5, 2010
1,217
0
0
Never heard of this Alan Scott guy but otherwise Guy Gardner is clearly the gayest green lantern.
 

subtlefuge

Lord Cromulent
May 21, 2010
1,106
0
0
Glad it's not Hal Jordan to undermine the Queen/Jordan friendship.

Glad it's not Kyle Rayner because. Don't know why really.

Glad it's still going to piss off However Many Moms.

Wish it was someone a little more iconic.
 

Redd the Sock

New member
Apr 14, 2010
1,088
0
0
MorganL4 said:
Kelethor said:
huh....thought for sure it was flash.
I knew it wasn't going to be Flash, or Jordan because in the new JL comic books those two argue over who gets to hit on Wonder Woman, so that was a foregone conclusion.


What I want to know, is how are they gonna explain Jade: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jade_%28comics%29


If he is not "recently gay" that would imply that he was always out of the closet, so somewhere along the line, either artificial insemination happened, or Thorn ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_and_Thorn ) knowing married a gay man. ( which is weird)
It's a new timeline so they can do whatever they what to him, even if it means we no longer have one hot green lady, and one broody shadow man. Maybe they'll get new origins (nad parents) if they show up.
 

OniaPL

New member
Nov 9, 2010
1,057
0
0
Valis88 said:
*sigh* The picture with that article, is so romantic.

I wish hetero love was half that romance really...what a lovely kiss.
Am I the only one around these parts who thinks that gay romances are most likely pretty much the same as hetero? Not better or worse?

And besides, hetero love has plenty of romance as long as you find a guy/gal that matches you.
 

search_rip

New member
Jan 6, 2009
249
0
0
Hitchmeister said:
DVS BSTrD said:
He's a man who draws power from jewelry, what did you expect?
Be fair, there are lots of non-gay Green Lanterns who draw their power from jewelry. It just so happens that this one's weakness is wood...
WAIT... it all makes sense now :p *LOL*
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,989
0
0
Not surprised its the Green Lantern in the slightest. GL is easy to interchange with damn near anyone, regardless of sex, ethnicity, or sexual orientation, as shown here.
 

Farther than stars

New member
Jun 19, 2011
1,228
0
0
DVS BSTrD said:
He's a man who draws power from jewelry, what did you expect?
Well, to be fair all superheroes are either spandex-wearing men or super-buff women. I figure you could probably make a gay joke about any of them. But hey, what do you know? Steve Butts called it and was exactly on the dollar, suspiciously so even...