Technically they can take risks, but financially they won't.ChromeAlchemist said:It's not really here, it's other places where many people value graphics over gameplay. Gameplay isn't so much shit, as it is stagnating over the similarity. Either way this industry is sick and needs a surgeon. Is it really a case of companies shaping up though? The larger companies can take risks, it's the smaller ones that are being killed off.theultimateend said:Everyone doesn't want that.ChromeAlchemist said:I don't think it helps a good deal when everyone wants every new game to visually trump the ones before it. The games don't have to look like Prototype, but they also don't have to look like Killzone 2, especially considering how long KZ2 took to get here, a development time most devs don't have. I'm gravy with a game that is a blast to play and looks good. Not eyeball searing, but good. If they can do both, even better, but know where your priorities lie.Wildrow12 said:So hope all who live to see such times, compadre.ChromeAlchemist said:I said it before and I'll say it again, this generation is cursed. Let's hope next generation doesn't repeat the same mistakes.
This gen is too costly. R.I.P.:
Free Radical
GRIN Studios
3D Realms (DNF Team)
List Pending.
In fact the minority of people polled show they prefer graphics over quality gameplay.
The thing is that across the board gameplay is shit (basically) and so you only have one thing to improve on.
That's why I find myself more often than not playing PS1 games on my modded PSP . They look like crap but overall the gameplay was pretty entertaining.
Gaming has Periods of Bubble and Bust just like any other market, once this bust is done another Bubble will arise.
Just need some of the larger companies to shape up or crumble really.
I agree on this being a phase though (if that's what you were saying), I've said so myself in the past.
Graphics just don't need to improve in leaps and bounds any more in my opinion.
Investors rarely invest in risk unless you REALLY sell it to them.
Smaller companies have little to lose since they have little already so they tend to try wild things.
World of Goo being a good example.
OR you could use the Valve model, take something you think will be shit (IE Portal) and package it with something you think is god (IE Half Life 2) then if it IS good it'll end up overshadowing its parent .
At least I've heard way more about portal than HL2.