Halo 4 gets a 2/10...
- Thread starter RedDeadFred
- Start date
Recommended Videos
im sorry, i think i was high on happiness that day playing halo 4.. theirs numerous games deserve 2/10. like the ps2 game ''25 to life''.. but not this game, theirs a lot of effort and love put in this game. the opening cut scene is the best cut scene i have scene in halo. the game may not deserve 10 but it also does not deserve a 2. thats just trolling.alphamalet said:
yes, those are 2/10 games... i was high on happiness that day. i forgot about a lot of actually crappy games.Vausch said:
The amount of effort and/or love put in the game is not what a games score is determined by, else Duke Nukem Forever would have been a perfect 10. It's not trolling, it's his opinion, and he gave it a 1 out of 5, there is a difference.xshadowscreamx said:
my life bar is depleted, your a victorious. i totally forgot about duke nukem forever, the game that ''defied'' all expectations.charge52 said:
True but it worked before that by simply getting on Metacritic. Also, apparently this guy has been around for a long time and doesn't really need the extra publicity (at least that's what a couple of people have told me) so he really might just dislike the game that much.Notsomuch said:
So, somebody's full of shit. The gameplay certainly looks very solid. I am a bit annoyed at the injection of Cortana's PMS melodrama.
ALSO, the composer is different, and therefore the main theme is totally new AND all of the atmosphere of the game has been a bit altered.
I actually really disliked this at first because NOT WHAT I'M USED TO. But it's growing on me. I haven't actually played the game yet, and when dealing with any type of scoring you need to actually experience the entire product.
The title screen actually follows the Halo formula. Vocal music (female), though with a more middle eastern scale as opposed to 7 tone western gregorian chant. After that a little moody sci fi stuff (VERY DIFFERENT WHAT WITH OSCILLATING NOISE AND STAR TREK HORNS), then Halo piano chords played at 3:18.
Still unsure
Plays pretty dang good to me, but I'm no connoisseur, I just like to play shooters and RPGs and have a good time.
I've always had a distaste for Halo, much like I have a distaste for Call of Duty and Tekken.. All for basically the same reason: Refusal to evolve.
Regardless how little changes from game to game, and how much I dislike the formula, and how I vow to not spend another dollar until a change is made... I will never deny that they are objectively 'good' games. You don't make gigantic franchises like this by making bad games. And I doubt Halo 4 is a bad game.
Regardless how little changes from game to game, and how much I dislike the formula, and how I vow to not spend another dollar until a change is made... I will never deny that they are objectively 'good' games. You don't make gigantic franchises like this by making bad games. And I doubt Halo 4 is a bad game.
All I see is that someone really hates the game. That's pretty much it.RedDeadFred said:
Grand scheme of things, I think one opinion does not matter. What should matter more is the overall score. In order to get an almost 90 score, you are going to need more positive votes than negative ones.
What is more surprising is that the popular opinion is dead even. Everyone that loves it, there's another that hates it. Either that's because some people are dirty hipsters who only hate the game ironically or they are getting tired of samey games.
Trolls will be trolls a 2/10 is a game that is unplayable and completely broken. Halo 4 may not be that great but it's none of these.
Judging from the user reviews, it's probably the latter. Sure there's probably a few people just trolling but the majority of them seem genuinely disappointed.malestrithe said:
What? 2 is unplayable? Whats worse than that? If 2 is totally broken then what can 1 and 0 mean. I HATE the 3 point scale we have now where it works like this:disgruntledgamer said:
0 - Joke
1 - Joke
2 - Joke
3 - Joke
4 - Joke
5 - Terrible
6 - Bad
7 - Average
8 - Good
9 - Very good
10 - Excellent
When instead it should be.
0 - Broken and totally unplayable.
1 - Extremely bad
2 - Pretty damn bad
3 - Bad
4 - Quite bad
5 - Average
6 - Good
7 - Quite good
8 - Pretty damn good
9 - Extremely good
10 - Almost perfect
If halo 4 is pretty damn bad so be it. I doubt it is though. Id say it merits a 4 at worst.
AI's having a lifespan isn't a terrible idea at all. It's great, and that the reviewer didn't understand that Cortana isn't just ones and zeroes, she's a neural network type intelligence and surpasses human intellect because she's essentially a synthetic mind, thus why not explore the idea of mental disorder and neurological decay, etc in an AI.
At least he's not doing a gamespot and just giving 8/10s to mediocre blockbuster games
also it's 1/5, not 2/10. Unless there's a 0.5/5 it's not the same thing
also it's 1/5, not 2/10. Unless there's a 0.5/5 it's not the same thing
Agree so hard. I don't pay attention to game reviewers for this very reason. I mean, officially Halo Reach got "critically acclaimed" for fuck's sake, despite being completely inferior to prior Halo installations.BiscuitTrouser said:
Ok I gotta say something...
A lot of lesser known JRPG's get reviews like that and apparently we're not allowed to complain about those. I'm not saying the Halo 4 review is right though. Just saying bad reviews and their reviewers should be called out for not doing their job properly.
A lot of lesser known JRPG's get reviews like that and apparently we're not allowed to complain about those. I'm not saying the Halo 4 review is right though. Just saying bad reviews and their reviewers should be called out for not doing their job properly.