I am not a fan of most the Halo lore and backstory. Its boring and really unoriginal token sci fi. There are some things that *could* be interesting if they showed any desire to look into the moral implications of what... anybody is doing. Halo 3 didn't end in a cliffhanger. Halo 3 ended.Korten12 said:You know that Halo has lots of stuff to used in the story, and just because the Master Chief is the main character doesn't mean their being restrictive. They ended the story with a cliff-hanger, so they're continuing the story.legend forge said:I am not talking about specific details, I am talking about new and interesting story elements or gameplay. If these whatever-they-ares turn out to be absolutely fascinating and tell a deeply interesting story then we will see about that. I reiterate: my main issue is Chief being the protagonist and larger issues with the Halo lore. "Different" and "new" are not the same thing.Demon ID said:If creating a new faction of enemies with different skills, AI, weapons and generally ways to ruin your day isn't classed as new I give up.
Halo has lots of lore, so they have a lot to work with.
Like I said before, having him immediately return like that cheapens his sacrifice in the last game, one of two emotionally impacting scenes in the ENTIRE series for me. The other was finally getting to kill that little bastard 343 Guilty Spark with Johnson dying behind me. Also that exact thing has happened once already in a previous game, and I hear once again in one of those books (I read Fall of Reach, it was horrible). It's just irritating that they would pull the same trick over and over to ensure that the most boring character in the series gets to keep showing up, especially after his perfectly serviceable ending.