All Skullcandys I've listened to sounded off somehow, to much bass, muddy highs, and most I've touched were fragile as hell. I prefer to have fairly level frequency response on headphones, extreme Vs and all those just aren't my cup of tea.Straying Bullet said:All these prices, I get a skullcandy everyday. No need to talk, can grab an alternative stand-alone mic'.
Definitely. I love my G35's. I game on my laptop hooked up to my monitor, keyboard, and mouse, so its speakers are to the side. I can't exactly play like that, so I got a headset. My god is the G35 amazing. I can hear the helicopter blades wirring above me in Bad Company 2, and people playing the Lute at all angles in Lord of the Rings Online. I don't even care about getting regular speakers anymore; these are just fine.Xersues said:My Logitech G35 is 120, and 7.1 surround and are purely amazing. I'd get those any day over these.
ok this headset is looking better and better. u can get for $90 and its a 7.1 ... can some1 link me a comparable 7.1 headset for that price point? cause im almost ready to buy it XDXersues said:My Logitech G35 is 120, and 7.1 surround and are purely amazing. I'd get those any day over these.
I have the G35 and 5.1 speakers for my computer, and aside from the cord its pretty much identical to my speakers in its surround sound. I love these things to death and not to mention they look a lot cooler and have great driver support since it is logitech and the mic quality on it kicks ass compared to most other mics. If you got the money i would recommend these to anyone, they sound great with any setup and if you put the right pad on you can barely feel them on your head.Sturmdolch said:Definitely. I love my G35's. I game on my laptop hooked up to my monitor, keyboard, and mouse, so its speakers are to the side. I can't exactly play like that, so I got a headset. My god is the G35 amazing. I can hear the helicopter blades wirring above me in Bad Company 2, and people playing the Lute at all angles in Lord of the Rings Online. I don't even care about getting regular speakers anymore; these are just fine.Xersues said:My Logitech G35 is 120, and 7.1 surround and are purely amazing. I'd get those any day over these.
That's just not true. I have a nice set of Sennheiser monitor's at the office and a Razer Barracuda [http://www.amazon.com/Razer-Barracuda-8-Channel-Gaming-Headphones/dp/B000H89E20] at home for gaming. The Sennheiser's are unquestionably better for audio quality, comfort, and noise isolation (which they damn well should be), but they can't do 3D audio positioning. At best, the games themselves can try to interpolate 3D audio into Stereo, but it doesn't compare to the real deal. Surround headsets are a case where the whole is far greater than the sum of the parts.4RT1LL3RY said:A good pair of stereo headphones gives just as much information about location of a sound and they will sound incredible when listening to music as well.
Those look nice, but they're USB. USB headphones make me sad - the audio quality is entirely reliant on software, and they're bad for performance compared to even onboard audio. If you're running on a laptop, sure, but I couldn't bring myself to use them on a real PC. I'm kind of jealous that Tito's review set can accept optical inputs - I would have jumped at that if I had seen that when I was shopping for headphones.dududf said:http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/computer/gaming-headsets/gamecom-777 I own it, take my word for it. It's fucking awesome.
I can't speak for the ones he reviewed, but I found that the positioning in the stereo sets work very well. It's not as good as having your whole room wired with a full set of speakers, but it's the next best thing.ZippyDSMlee said:How is the 5.1 positioning of sound? If it is not clear that there is a rear and front its kinda all kinda moot.....
The optical audio port is on the cable adapters. If you connect your 360 with HDMI, you don't have the port unless you buy the HDMI Connection Kit [http://www.amazon.com/Xbox-360-HDMI-Cable-Connection-Kit/dp/B001OLXMUY]. Most people using HDMI use it for both audio and video - only people who have complicated stereos or are just anal-retentive (or both, like me) use both HDMI and optical audio.akmarksman said:What? your 360 cable didn't have optical? Do you have the core edition or something? Different SKU?
Yeah, me too. I had a set of Cambridge Soundworks speakers, from back when Creative hadn't ruined their company and quality yet. They had a digital receiver, full 5.1 sound, multiple input types (including optical), and were the perfect size to fit in/around a desk. Unfortunately, last year the receiver finally died on me, and I couldn't find anything else that I liked, or that didn't looks like it fell out of a super exxtreme Mountain Dew commercial. That's when I switched to the stereo headphones.The_Healer said:Hmm I'd rather have good 5.1 gaming speakers. I wish someone would make good ones...
I must have picked the wrong head phones, as these are not USB, they plug directly into a audio socket. It's hard to tell what the number on mine are, as it doesn't say it.Virgil said:Those look nice, but they're USB. USB headphones make me sad - the audio quality is entirely reliant on software, and they're bad for performance compared to even onboard audio. If you're running on a laptop, sure, but I couldn't bring myself to use them on a real PC. I'm kind of jealous that Tito's review set can accept optical inputs - I would have jumped at that if I had seen that when I was shopping for headphones.dududf said:http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/computer/gaming-headsets/gamecom-777 I own it, take my word for it. It's fucking awesome.
That's the worst, lowest-end "X-Fi" that barely qualifies as such. You'd be better off with on-board. And that's not from the "audiophile" standpoint, as some people in this thread seem to be coming from (There are no audiophiles in gaming, game audio is consistently poor quality), but from an average user.Plinglebob said:Or you could just buy a soundcard like this [http://us.store.creative.com/Sound-Blaster-XFi-Xtreme-Audio-PCI/M/B000W7PNZI.htm] at $60, and a cheap pair of headphones and you'll have the same effect.RvLeshrac said:There's no such thing as a "good" sub-$100 Surround headset (yes, this is sad). You can get a good communication headset for $20-30 (I like the Logitech PS2/3 USB headsets) , and a decent stereo headset for $50-100 (Logitech G330 on the low end, Steel 5H on the high).LoopyDood said:I was getting excited about them until I saw the price, $160. I'm looking for something in the sub-$100 range, could anyone make any suggestions?
I think the vast majority of us that use USB headsets are using them for comm devices, not for in-game audio. *all* USB headsets are mediocre headphones, but they work very well as headsets.Virgil said:Those look nice, but they're USB. USB headphones make me sad - the audio quality is entirely reliant on software, and they're bad for performance compared to even onboard audio. If you're running on a laptop, sure, but I couldn't bring myself to use them on a real PC. I'm kind of jealous that Tito's review set can accept optical inputs - I would have jumped at that if I had seen that when I was shopping for headphones.
I donated my old 4.1 Soundworks set to a family member after picking up a Logitech X540 at an 'X'-treme (HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahahaha. ha.) discount. They're fantastic, for the price.Virgil said:Yeah, me too. I had a set of Cambridge Soundworks speakers, from back when Creative hadn't ruined their company and quality yet. They had a digital receiver, full 5.1 sound, multiple input types (including optical), and were the perfect size to fit in/around a desk. Unfortunately, last year the receiver finally died on me, and I couldn't find anything else that I liked, or that didn't looks like it fell out of a super exxtreme Mountain Dew commercial. That's when I switched to the stereo headphones.