Harry potter

[killcheese]

Today i spent the entire day watching all the harry potter movies, 1 thru 5, back to back. It took about 13 hours. So i want to know what you all think of the movies, what was in the books but not in the movies, are you going to see the new movie. etc

 

[pantsoffdanceoff]

Hermione is quite hot or as my homies would say "bootilicious". And Daniel Radcliff (Actor as Harry's Part) was naked on Broadway. That is all.

[color="white"/]Damn right I have "homies"[/color]

 

[killcheese]

Hermione is quite hot or as my homies would say "bootilicious". And Daniel Radcliff was naked on Broadway. That is all.

[color="white"/]Damn right I have "homies"[/color]

The thing is in the first movie she was like 10. And when you watch all of them back to back you still feel like your watching a 10 year old girl...

 

[The_Prophet]

1, 2, 3 and 4 were good, but then they started messing around.

 

[pantsoffdanceoff]

They get a solid Meh from me, I've seen very few good book to movie adaptations, and HP isn't one of them.

Where the hell is Peeves?!?!?!

Cuckoo's Nest and Fear and Loathing immediately come to mind

And not Fight Club? Consider yourself smacked.

Hermione is quite hot or as my homies would say "bootilicious". And Daniel Radcliff was naked on Broadway. That is all.

[color="white"/]Damn right I have "homies"[/color]

The thing is in the first movie she was like 10. And when you watch all of them back to back you still feel like your watching a 10 year old girl...

Well that sucks because you're missing out on the appreciation of some serious softcore hooking up moments.

 

[Knonsense]

I kind of fell out of it after a good while. They're not really bad. I suppose one thing that turned me off for some reason was how the author renamed common fantasy concepts and pretended she invented them. Really not sure why it irked me so much.

This is actually a spoiler, not a picture.

Spoiler

Sorcerer's stone = Philosopher's stone
Voldemort isn't a lich. He just threw a chunk of his soul in a stone with a name that I can't pronounce. But he's definitely not a lich because J.K. Rowling never said so.
etc.

 

[Skeleon]

They were okay.
I read the books and definitely had some very different images of many of the places, but that's okay. How are they to know my personal imagination?
The books were a tad better but not by much.

By the way, you can't watch a move "back to back", that's reserved for reading books. /smartass

 

[Lusperus]

He got a haircut in the latest one and that kinda was wierd for me.

 

[TaborMallory]

The books used to be good, but all the movies are crap.

 

[Jonxxx]

5 was my favorite... 3 Sucked ass... the rest were "Okay"



and hermione is hot.

 

[NeutralDrow]

Listing the differences between the movie and book versions gets difficult starting with the third movie.

That said, I rather enjoyed the first movie, was fine with the second, was disappointed by the third and fourth, liked the fifth, and am looking forward to the sixth.

I kind of fell out of it after a good while. They're not really bad. I suppose one thing that turned me off for some reason was how the author renamed common fantasy concepts and pretended she invented them. Really not sure why it irked me so much.

Since when did she pretend like she invented them? By using them at all?

This is actually a spoiler, not a picture.

Spoiler

Sorcerer's stone = Philosopher's stone
Voldemort isn't a lich. He just threw a chunk of his soul in a stone with a name that I can't pronounce. But he's definitely not a lich because J.K. Rowling never said so.
etc.

This is also a spoiler, not a picture.

Spoiler

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone is the title of the book. The US release had a different title for some weird reason.

Never thought of that connection. 'Course, he's not a lich anyway, since he's not undead, and Gary Gygax most likely got the idea from ancient Egypt, so I'm not sure what your point is.