I think you have described my feelings on DarkSydePhil in a nutshell. Practically every game he plays for his channel, he acts like what you have described and more. I probably wouldn't call him a "casual player" though. I feel lumping people in with that guy is rather insulting.Salus said:I catch myself being an elitist gamer a lot.
Not overtly, but I find myself subtly despising people who take my favorite game and play it super-casual like they're waiting for their limo to pick them up in a few minutes.
A lot of "let's play" videos are in this category. Could be the most engaging, emotional and complex game ever, and all they can manage is "Dude, I got the laser sword! Is this a laser sword? Look at everything die, dude that's awesome. Is this the final cutscene? Dude, that looks like Voldermort! He's totally Voldermort. Ima kill you with my new laser sword."
If I were a game developer my heart would break a tiny bit each time I watched that kind of commentary. Especially if I wrote the lore or the music, which I swear 99% of gamers are physically incapable of noticing.
Thus, I tend to be more of a jerk in the comments section to those people. It's not that I hate the casual for playing on a casual timeframe, but rather the attitude he takes, like he's wiping his a** with the game.
On a similar note, one of the things that will push me into rant territory is something that's almost good. I've got that feeling about Remember Me right now, as I play through it. This isn't quite as bad as "bad sequel to good property," but it's up there.Casual Shinji said:I'm kind of the same.Zachary Amaranth said:I'm more likely to nitpick the things I love and I don't stop loving them for the nitpicks. Hell, I can nitpick something and praise it enthusiastically at the same time.
When I really like something I'm prone to focus on aspects of it that could've made it even better.
I have to have some amount of love for something in order to become "that guy". Like a shitty sequel to a series that I like (inFAMOUS: Second Son), shitty story DLC to a game that I like (The Last of Us: Left Behind), or the total ruination of a character that I like (Guts from Berserk).
I actually have that quite a bit as well. Even with things I'll admit are outright bad, but I feel could've been really good/interesting with just a few tweaks.Zachary Amaranth said:On a similar note, one of the things that will push me into rant territory is something that's almost good. I've got that feeling about Remember Me right now, as I play through it. This isn't quite as bad as "bad sequel to good property," but it's up there.
Nothing is worse then a work that is held back from greatness by a fatal flaw or three. A mediocre game can be safely ignored. Play it for three days, give it away/trade it in and forget about it. But a game that comes so close to being good? You can't just forget it. So you think about it, and replay it, and think about it, and talk about it. And the whole time, it's problems are just fucking there, blocking you from really getting into it.Casual Shinji said:I actually have that quite a bit as well. Even with things I'll admit are outright bad, but I feel could've been really good/interesting with just a few tweaks.Zachary Amaranth said:On a similar note, one of the things that will push me into rant territory is something that's almost good. I've got that feeling about Remember Me right now, as I play through it. This isn't quite as bad as "bad sequel to good property," but it's up there.
Like the movie Hancock. That movie could've been so good if they had made it about a child super hero from the 50's or 60's, who growns up to become this washed up, alcoholic has-been. Sort of like a child star allegory, but with super heroes.
Yeah! That's the worst!Eamar said:I turn into "That Girl" about metal, specifically when I get way too invested in saying that certain bands are or aren't metal.
That's pretty much why MLP's "A Canterlot Wedding" has always bothered me - it was so close to being sooo great, but the entire third act was hit with so many issues that it's hard for me to look past them at all the things it did right. Even to this day, I don't consider that two-parter flat-out bad by any means, but those episodes are still the two I complain about most in the entire series so far, just because of how much potential went to waste.AntiChri5 said:Nothing is worse then a work that is held back from greatness by a fatal flaw or three. A mediocre game can be safely ignored. Play it for three days, give it away/trade it in and forget about it. But a game that comes so close to being good? You can't just forget it. So you think about it, and replay it, and think about it, and talk about it. And the whole time, it's problems are just fucking there, blocking you from really getting into it.Casual Shinji said:I actually have that quite a bit as well. Even with things I'll admit are outright bad, but I feel could've been really good/interesting with just a few tweaks.Zachary Amaranth said:On a similar note, one of the things that will push me into rant territory is something that's almost good. I've got that feeling about Remember Me right now, as I play through it. This isn't quite as bad as "bad sequel to good property," but it's up there.
Like the movie Hancock. That movie could've been so good if they had made it about a child super hero from the 50's or 60's, who growns up to become this washed up, alcoholic has-been. Sort of like a child star allegory, but with super heroes.