Have You Played Fable?

[jebus4you]

Ive seen a couple reviews where people really do not like either fable or fable 2. Whats your opinion on the game?

 

[Valate_v1legacy]

I liked both games, for different reasons.

 

[DrDeath3191]

I liked both games, but the first was superior.

 

[Radeonx]

I liked both of them.
Why?
I found them fun.

 

[The Austin]

Fable 1: Arguable one of the best RPG's ever made.

Fable 2: Eh. It was pretty good, just not as good as the first.

 

[SomethingUnrelated]

Both were fun. That's pretty much all I have to say.

 

[Lord Mountbatten Reborn]

"Any1"?

I've played both games, and I did enjoy both, but then it all just depends on opinion; people will either love it or hate it.

 

[GreyWolf257]

I really enjoyed both of them.

 

[Erana]

Buy me the games and I'll let you know.

 

[TheNumber1Zero]

I actually prefer the second one myself. The first one was good and all, but I didn't like how stuck to paths the character was, not to mention that by the end of the game everyone probably just wore plate armor with a chainmail helmet (Maybe Will clothes).

Fable 2 Had it where you could explore more of the area rather than being stuck to its path, and it had no armor rating system on the clothes which meant there was no functional reason to wear something over another article of clothing, which meant more unique characters then the last. The multiplayer did suck though.

 

[Fear Gingers]

liked the first one better than the second but im not sure why. alot of people dislike the sencond but theres alot of good qualities about it. also try Risen i bought it its not bad for what it is but its alot like the first fable, brings back memories

 

[jobobob]

The first one is better, the second looks better but its way to repetative.

They are both easy though.

 

[mykalwane]

The Lost Chapters version of Fable 1 is the best. Has a kick ass final Boss battle of you fighting a dragon. Though the regular Final Boss is a good one because even Maxed out in everything the Boss can be a challenge. I enjoy it simply because of that. First time I faced the boss was easy took him down with arrows and dodging. Played him again same plan didn't work, had a decent fight with him. A much more satisfying end then Fable 2.

Fable 2 may not be as enjoyable, but it is a bit more addictive. The gameplay you start with at the beginning it is about the same in the end. It is a bit minute changes, but feels dumb down to have it more inviting to more players. It does that and Fable 2 is more inviting then Fable 1.

 

[Ryuk2]

I enjoyed first Fable game. I don't know why really. I liked the story, but the story was cliche, i liked how your appearance changes even if it doesn't effect anything at all. I liked the choices, but they were more like problems, then choices. I liked the linear, small maps with the loading screens.
I don't know why, probably because i was 13 years old when i last played it.

 

[D_987]

I enjoy both games - the original Fable is still on of my all-time favourite games, and Fable II was an excellent, if rather short, game.

 

[Valate_v1legacy]

I actually prefer the second one myself. The first one was good and all, but I didn't like how stuck to paths the character was, not to mention that by the end of the game everyone probably just wore plate armor with a chainmail helmet (Maybe Will clothes).

Fable 2 Had it where you could explore more of the area rather than being stuck to its path, and it had no armor rating system on the clothes which meant there was no functional reason to wear something over another article of clothing, which meant more unique characters then the last. The multiplayer did suck though.

I beat the game once in apprentices clothes.... and once wearing nothing but a chicken hat and standard weapons. The armor doesnt affect gameplay as mutch as you would think.

 

[sms_117b]

Only played the first enjoyed it, as I don't have a X-Box 360 I can't play the second but as my friends have all told me that it's not so good, it's probably for the best.

 

[creepy_rabbit]

the first one didn't really get the rpg elements that i like (open world)
the second one was only an upgrade of the first one

 

[TheNumber1Zero]

I actually prefer the second one myself. The first one was good and all, but I didn't like how stuck to paths the character was, not to mention that by the end of the game everyone probably just wore plate armor with a chainmail helmet (Maybe Will clothes).

Fable 2 Had it where you could explore more of the area rather than being stuck to its path, and it had no armor rating system on the clothes which meant there was no functional reason to wear something over another article of clothing, which meant more unique characters then the last. The multiplayer did suck though.

I beat the game once in apprentices clothes.... and once wearing nothing but a chicken hat and standard weapons. The armor doesnt affect gameplay as mutch as you would think.

Well you sound like quite the interesting hero, myself I tend to wear armor so I may take hits (Love to use the big area magic spells, plus I loved to steal so they were often quite cheap) but I can see that there are people such as yourself who would rather have a good laugh, and I respect that. I just found that having no armor rating made it where one could dress like a chicken with no pants and have no repurcussions battle wise.

 

[NickCaligo42]

I hate both games to death. Everything about the first is superficial and boring (if not just outright broken), and the second sounds like more of the same.