I love hbo due to their ambition, but they seem to be under some misconceptions. I'm watching Rome now after watching a Game of Thrones, and they really love one character being smug and in the right, and everybody else in the room being touche. Although it serves its purpose in dramatic effect it's rampant and in some episodes, the only type of dialogue that occurs. Occasionally in real life discussions are heated and both parties have valid points and I think hbo writers should consider this.
That being the points the one side often brings to the arguments of the shows are often more interesting than other types of writing, so if I absolutly had to decide for actualy dialogue or interesting points, i'd take the latter.
That being the points the one side often brings to the arguments of the shows are often more interesting than other types of writing, so if I absolutly had to decide for actualy dialogue or interesting points, i'd take the latter.