HBO's Chernobyl was bleak and and yet insightful.

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0

The series concludes after 5 episodes. I now know how horrifying the initial catastrophe was. And the horrific dangers of radiation are shown more clearly. And how much of this was made somewhat worse because of the politics involved.

Glad to see a historical series is made in this day and age in Movies and TV.
 

the December King

Member
Legacy
Mar 3, 2010
1,580
1
3
Excellent miniseries. Thoroughly enjoyed it so far, going to watch the last episode tonight. Bleak, yes, but soo well done. And the vfx have been... amazing ...you know, in that shuddery sense, where you're impressed and repulsed at the same time.
 

CaitSeith

Formely Gone Gonzo
Legacy
Jun 30, 2014
5,374
381
88
HBO's Chernobyl was bleak and and yet insightful.

I'm pretty sure CNET used that same header for their article...

OT: I don't think I can watch this on Netflix, so... *shrugs*
 

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
CaitSeith said:
HBO's Chernobyl was bleak and and yet insightful.

I'm pretty sure CNET used that same header for their article...

OT: I don't think I can watch this on Netflix, so... *shrugs*
I literally made that title by myself. I did not see any article.
 

bluegate

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 28, 2010
2,411
1,021
118
"HBO's Chernobyl was bleak and and yet insightful."

You should see Earth's Chernobyl, that's a whopper.
 

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
bluegate said:
"HBO's Chernobyl was bleak and and yet insightful."

You should see Earth's Chernobyl, that's a whopper.
Can't find it this Earth's Chernobyl.

Also I cannot believe even the internet is meme-ing the hell out of this show:

 
Oct 22, 2011
1,223
0
0
bluegate said:
"HBO's Chernobyl was bleak and and yet insightful."

You should see Earth's Chernobyl, that's a whopper.
Earth's Chernobyl's doing pretty good, actually. It's like a nature reserve now.
 

stroopwafel

Elite Member
Jul 16, 2013
3,031
357
88
Samtemdo8 said:
And how much of this was made somewhat worse because of the politics involved.
I wouldn't say 'somewhat'. The entire catastrophe was caused by rigid communist hierarchy and the denial of the person in charge that they found graphite in the reactor. If they acted on facts instead of delusional propaganda they would have taken the proper steps to prevent meltdown instead of overriding the system pretending nothing can go wrong.

But anyways, totally agree that this was a phenomenal series. They really highlighted the accident from various viewpoints; the scientists, the communist leadership, the miners, the soldiers, the everyday families, the direct radiation victims whose DNA is destroyed. A catastrophe with potentially global implications all taking place in this one little town. When that one scientist tells that if the remaining reactor leaks into the river it would pollute the rivers and make the land infertile for thousands of years you see Gorbatsjov almost gasping for air as they tell him this would kill off an entire nation. The hectic and the drama is just palpable in this series. Amazing acting as well.

The series also shows that the Soviets do turn around admitting the problem, espescially when Gorbatsjov becomes involved and immediately recognizes the danger by completely following the scientists advice. Obviously there is still this preposterous apparatsjik command structure but the initial delusion quickly dissipates. Probably also because the accident happened fairly late in the Soviet Union, when the regime was already on it's last legs. I think had it happened 10 years earlier the accident would have probably escalated even more.

But yeah, best show I've seen in a long while. Another big plus of this miniseries is that it gets straight to the point and doesn't waste time. This show was more memorable than other shows that run for 8 seasons.
 

Eacaraxe_v1legacy

New member
Mar 28, 2010
1,028
0
0
stroopwafel said:
I wouldn't say 'somewhat'. The entire catastrophe was caused by rigid communist hierarchy and the denial of the person in charge that they found graphite in the reactor. If they acted on facts instead of delusional propaganda they would have taken the proper steps to prevent meltdown instead of overriding the system pretending nothing can go wrong.
I'd exercise an extraordinary amount of caution attributing the disaster to a particular political or economic system, rather than the actual cause: systemic corruption wrought by an environment of opacity and unaccountability, which can happen anywhere.

But hey, I'm more than happy to have a conversation about TEPCO if you are.
 

Lil devils x_v1legacy

More Lego Goats Please!
May 17, 2011
2,728
0
0
stroopwafel said:
Samtemdo8 said:
And how much of this was made somewhat worse because of the politics involved.
I wouldn't say 'somewhat'. The entire catastrophe was caused by rigid communist hierarchy and the denial of the person in charge that they found graphite in the reactor. If they acted on facts instead of delusional propaganda they would have taken the proper steps to prevent meltdown instead of overriding the system pretending nothing can go wrong.
Communism has nothing to do with that mindset. They had the same mindset at Comanche Peak when they had an improperly installed nuclear reactor.The NRC, EPA and all government officials involved were bought off and tried to cover it up. My family went into hiding over this due to them blowing up one of my father's coworkers cars and sending men to threaten my mother while she was gardening in our yard. If the engineers, including my father didn't go to the press (multiple news agencies refused to run the story before they found ones that would mind you) they would have just tried to hide it even though it was leaking and affecting homes and a daycare. ALL capitalists involved didn't make the situation any better. Bad people do bad things. Actual communism should have more oversight, not less if their system was designed properly. I don't think anyone accused Russia or the US of designing it properly, however.

Eacaraxe said:
stroopwafel said:
I wouldn't say 'somewhat'. The entire catastrophe was caused by rigid communist hierarchy and the denial of the person in charge that they found graphite in the reactor. If they acted on facts instead of delusional propaganda they would have taken the proper steps to prevent meltdown instead of overriding the system pretending nothing can go wrong.
I'd exercise an extraordinary amount of caution attributing the disaster to a particular political or economic system, rather than the actual cause: systemic corruption wrought by an environment of opacity and unaccountability, which can happen anywhere.

But hey, I'm more than happy to have a conversation about TEPCO if you are.
Exactly right, that level of corruption DOES happen everywhere, especially in the US as well. All they do is try to cover it up rather than try to resolve the problem and save lives. Years ago we had a lengthy discussion on this in R&P, had links to all the information on NRC region IV and Commanche Peak, the whistleblowers and now it looks like they are trying to bury it and make it impossible to find the links online. Even after they were exposed years ago, they are STILL trying to bury it even after they lost a lawsuit stating they couldn't. Go figure.

One of the whistleblowers involved did manage to set a precedent, but then they cover it up anyways and you can hardly find anything about it now:

https://www.whistleblowers.org/members/joe-macktal/
 

stroopwafel

Elite Member
Jul 16, 2013
3,031
357
88
Lil devils x said:
Communism has nothing to do with that mindset.
I never said a cover-up wouldn't take place in a 'capitalist' company(it has and it will) but that holding on to propaganda at all costs is very typical of communist ideology and the distortion of facts is something Russia still hasn't completely shaken off. And not in the 'fake news' sense of the U.S. but in the entirety of it's institutions, legislative branches and media. Political dissent is as good as absent. That was obviously at it's zenith in the communist era but it demonstrates how harmful the secrecy and denial of facts are. Not just after the accident happened but at the very moment it was unfolding. When that one scientist said he found graphite in the reactor and the apparatsjik in charge says ''you have not seen that'' do you honestly believe dissent would be silenced as easily in a capitalist company? In what political system do you run the risk of being executed when going against orders? I'll give you a hint: not one where there is separation of powers.

That cocktail of paranoia, fear, manipulation of the facts and a delusional belief in propaganda all directly contributed to the accident in Chernobyl. And yes, these are all symptoms of the communist system.
 

CaitSeith

Formely Gone Gonzo
Legacy
Jun 30, 2014
5,374
381
88
stroopwafel said:
Lil devils x said:
Communism has nothing to do with that mindset.
When that one scientist said he found graphite in the reactor and the apparatsjik in charge says ''you have not seen that'' do you honestly believe dissent would be silenced as easily in a capitalist company?
"You have not seen cancer in those lungs"

"You have not seen brain damage in those former football players"

"You have not seen temperature raising in that global chart"

etc, etc, etc...
 

stroopwafel

Elite Member
Jul 16, 2013
3,031
357
88
CaitSeith said:
stroopwafel said:
Lil devils x said:
Communism has nothing to do with that mindset.
When that one scientist said he found graphite in the reactor and the apparatsjik in charge says ''you have not seen that'' do you honestly believe dissent would be silenced as easily in a capitalist company?
"You have not seen cancer in those lungs"

"You have not seen brain damage in those former football players"

"You have not seen temperature raising in that global chart"

etc, etc, etc...
You conflate disinformation with complete intolerance for any form of dissent. That is what a communist system is, complete repression of anything that goes against authority even if it's to prevent a nuclear meltdown. You defend something what even Gorbatsjov considered was probably the defining moment of Soviet collapse in his memoires.
 

Eacaraxe_v1legacy

New member
Mar 28, 2010
1,028
0
0
stroopwafel said:
And not in the 'fake news' sense of the U.S...
A short story in four chapters, as told via hyperlinks.

Chapter 1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WarnerMedia]
Chapter 2. [https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-relationship-media-761025/]
Chapter 3. [https://venturebeat.com/2018/10/12/trump-administration-defends-fccs-repeal-of-net-neutrality-rules/]
Chapter 4. [https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/05/14/disgraceful-while-reaping-21-billion-windfall-trump-tax-cuts-report-shows-att]

Yes, in exactly that sense.

...do you honestly believe dissent would be silenced as easily in a capitalist company?
Pretty sure Edward Snowden might have a thing or two to say about that. At least, in the broader societal sense, especially given the all-too-comfy relations between FANG's and the major telecoms, and our intelligence and defense agencies. Pretty sure James Damore might have something to say about that, too; remember how he was defamed light of his memo coming to public attention, meanwhile Google and Alphabet execs were getting #MeToo'ed and it was in the middle of a gender pay discrimination scandal?
 

stroopwafel

Elite Member
Jul 16, 2013
3,031
357
88
Eacaraxe said:
stroopwafel said:
And not in the 'fake news' sense of the U.S...
A short story in four chapters, as told via hyperlinks.

Chapter 1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WarnerMedia]
Chapter 2. [https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-relationship-media-761025/]
Chapter 3. [https://venturebeat.com/2018/10/12/trump-administration-defends-fccs-repeal-of-net-neutrality-rules/]
Chapter 4. [https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/05/14/disgraceful-while-reaping-21-billion-windfall-trump-tax-cuts-report-shows-att]

Yes, in exactly that sense.

...do you honestly believe dissent would be silenced as easily in a capitalist company?
Pretty sure Edward Snowden might have a thing or two to say about that. At least, in the broader societal sense, especially given the all-too-comfy relations between FANG's and the major telecoms, and our intelligence and defense agencies. But, speaking of Alphabet as a FANG, remember James Damore?
Snowden leaked classified information. If he did that in the SU(or modern Russia for that matter) KGB hitters would have found him a long time ago. Probably everyone close to him as well just to be sure.

The fact you can debate these issues at all is exemplary of the freedom you would never have in a communist system. There would be bigger concerns to worry about than Trump's tax returns.
 

Lil devils x_v1legacy

More Lego Goats Please!
May 17, 2011
2,728
0
0
stroopwafel said:
CaitSeith said:
stroopwafel said:
Lil devils x said:
Communism has nothing to do with that mindset.
When that one scientist said he found graphite in the reactor and the apparatsjik in charge says ''you have not seen that'' do you honestly believe dissent would be silenced as easily in a capitalist company?
"You have not seen cancer in those lungs"

"You have not seen brain damage in those former football players"

"You have not seen temperature raising in that global chart"

etc, etc, etc...
You conflate disinformation with complete intolerance for any form of dissent. That is what a communist system is, complete repression of anything that goes against authority even if it's to prevent a nuclear meltdown. You defend something what even Gorbatsjov considered was probably the defining moment of Soviet collapse in his memoires.
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power plant's private investors had people blow up a man's car in an attempt to silence him about an improperly installed nuclear reactor. They had armed men threaten the wives and children of employees that brought up the extremely dangerous radiation leaks and covered up falsified safety inspections. They had the NRC that oversaw their plant in their pocket and instead of oversight they agreed to not only look the other way, but actively cover it up for them. Even the vast majority of the press was terrified to be the person to report it even given a massive pile of documents by dozens of men but kept silent until it was already out there elsewhere. How can you get any more intolerant than that? This happened under Reagan and Bush and Rick Perry specifically lobbied for them to have lax regulation, not some failed soviet state. Instead of punishing those who did this, they promoted them. He is now head of the department of energy for doing these things instead.
 
Sep 28, 2016
171
0
0
stroopwafel said:
Eacaraxe said:
stroopwafel said:
And not in the 'fake news' sense of the U.S...
A short story in four chapters, as told via hyperlinks.

Chapter 1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WarnerMedia]
Chapter 2. [https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-relationship-media-761025/]
Chapter 3. [https://venturebeat.com/2018/10/12/trump-administration-defends-fccs-repeal-of-net-neutrality-rules/]
Chapter 4. [https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/05/14/disgraceful-while-reaping-21-billion-windfall-trump-tax-cuts-report-shows-att]

Yes, in exactly that sense.

...do you honestly believe dissent would be silenced as easily in a capitalist company?
Pretty sure Edward Snowden might have a thing or two to say about that. At least, in the broader societal sense, especially given the all-too-comfy relations between FANG's and the major telecoms, and our intelligence and defense agencies. But, speaking of Alphabet as a FANG, remember James Damore?
Snowden leaked classified information. If he did that in the SU(or modern Russia for that matter) KGB hitters would have found him a long time ago. Probably everyone close to him as well just to be sure.

The fact you can debate these issues at all is exemplary of the freedom you would never have in a communist system. There would be bigger concerns to worry about than Trump's tax returns.
Communism =/= Authoritarianism
 

Eacaraxe_v1legacy

New member
Mar 28, 2010
1,028
0
0
stroopwafel said:
Snowden leaked classified information. If he did that in the SU(or modern Russia for that matter) KGB hitters would have found him a long time ago. Probably everyone close to him as well just to be sure.
Or, perhaps, we in the West learned from the mistakes of the "great" totalitarian regimes of the 20th Century, realized the folly of the Streisand effect, and taken the tact of "discredit and defame" instead. One might learn well from the fossil fuel industry's attempts to discredit and defame Clair Patterson and Herbert Needleman, for example.

Or, for that matter, how M. King Hubbert's and Kenneth Deffeyes' work on peak oil theory has been "discredited" despite the fact the theory is that a resource we know beyond a shadow of a doubt to be finite will eventually run out, simply because in the decades since we found new proven reserves -- and because Hubbert and Deffeyes never predicted we'd be stupid enough to resort to tar sands, oil shale, and high-volume fracking.