It's probably because they have no small amount of status that they keep getting hired. They're probably better at selling themselves in an industry that basically runs on that. But that alone will probably not convince the showbiz execs. So how about also having worked on successful properties that made a lot of money? Now we're talking. Yeah, they're more expensive, but they have proven record in the real measuring stick for success. Talent? A nice bonus, but not a requirement.Eacaraxe said:That's the thing, these are usually hacks with no small amount of status, whose status (at least among fans) is for being hacks, and despite this it has to cost a pretty penny to attach their name to them. Why shell out A- and B-list bucks for inferior, problematic, talent that sets potential viewers on guard by default? Surely to god it has to cost less to attach lesser-known creatives, who not only might be more talented (or indeed, talented at all) but are going to work harder for less money in hopes of breaking into the industry.Chimpzy said:Why put in the effort when in all likelyhood it won't make much of a difference profit wise, if any at all?
As for the fans? Sure, a lot of them will piss and moan, but most of them will cave and watch whatever dross they're served anyway, and the execs know that.