You have to understand, these spell names and card names are incredibly common. Just because Blizzard called a spell "Frostbolt" doesn't mean it's doing anything other than telling you that it is a spell that does frost shit. It's not likely that most minion cards between the two games will be the same, for instance, because the franchise and universe isn't anywhere near similar. You can blame the whole of gaming for having names that are common among fantasy spells. "Counterspell" is hardly revolutionary.Mark D. Stroyer said:Wait, so does Hearthstone really have so many name-drops of Magic cards? That right there might get annoying.
As a guy who is already into Magic Online, I've probably got my fix covered there. I'll very likely try out Hearthstone somewhere down the line, but it seems to fit the WOW TCG model, which...is not my cup of tea.
I fucked someone very hard with 'Eye for an Eye'. They literally pulled deathwing (we were both pretty much down to our last cards)out. I had nothing left, the idiot had only 2 cards to attack me with, the other would have saved him/her. But I think they wanted to keep it as it was a taunt card... but still attacking first with deathwing, and it still not having enough attack to drain my remaining health.Smilomaniac said:Secrets are the poor mans reaction spells, but require a bit of strategic thinking, knowledge of the cards and what tactic your opponent is employing.
I do mean actual namedrops. To wit, just from this article: Mirror Entity [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=141818] (as above), Polymorph [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=191380]Ferisar said:You have to understand, these spell names and card names are incredibly common. Just because Blizzard called a spell "Frostbolt" doesn't mean it's doing anything other than telling you that it is a spell that does frost shit. It's not likely that most minion cards between the two games will be the same, for instance, because the franchise and universe isn't anywhere near similar. You can blame the whole of gaming for having names that are common among fantasy spells. "Counterspell" is hardly revolutionary.
OT:
Yay Hearthstone stuff!
Mirror Entity and Polymorph are hardly ubiquitous to MTG.Mark D. Stroyer said:I do mean actual namedrops. To wit, just from this article: Mirror Entity [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=141818] (as above), Polymorph [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=191380]Ferisar said:You have to understand, these spell names and card names are incredibly common. Just because Blizzard called a spell "Frostbolt" doesn't mean it's doing anything other than telling you that it is a spell that does frost shit. It's not likely that most minion cards between the two games will be the same, for instance, because the franchise and universe isn't anywhere near similar. You can blame the whole of gaming for having names that are common among fantasy spells. "Counterspell" is hardly revolutionary.
OT:
Yay Hearthstone stuff!
There's a difference from a generic, like Frostbolt, and a reference, like Glacial Ray [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=370552]. As someone who's familiar, it's...unnerving, that's all.
Pretty much this. Polymorph is a very common Warcraft-universe spell of mages ever since the days of WC3 (nor is the concept of "polymorph" that recent.) and Mirror Entity is... exactly what it sounds like. So I really don't see what you're concerned with. If something like "Super Undertrauhen Growth if the Treestras" or some bullshit name floated up across both games, I'd start rustling. Until then, it's just a hilariously generic fantasy spell name.Loop Stricken said:Mirror Entity and Polymorph are hardly ubiquitous to MTG.Mark D. Stroyer said:I do mean actual namedrops. To wit, just from this article: Mirror Entity [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=141818] (as above), Polymorph [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=191380]Ferisar said:You have to understand, these spell names and card names are incredibly common. Just because Blizzard called a spell "Frostbolt" doesn't mean it's doing anything other than telling you that it is a spell that does frost shit. It's not likely that most minion cards between the two games will be the same, for instance, because the franchise and universe isn't anywhere near similar. You can blame the whole of gaming for having names that are common among fantasy spells. "Counterspell" is hardly revolutionary.
OT:
Yay Hearthstone stuff!
There's a difference from a generic, like Frostbolt, and a reference, like Glacial Ray [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=370552]. As someone who's familiar, it's...unnerving, that's all.
Not a big point, but Polymorph has been a mage spell since Warcraft 2, actually.Ferisar said:Pretty much this. Polymorph is a very common Warcraft-universe spell of mages ever since the days of WC3 (nor is the concept of "polymorph" that recent.) and Mirror Entity is... exactly what it sounds like. So I really don't see what you're concerned with. If something like "Super Undertrauhen Growth if the Treestras" or some bullshit name floated up across both games, I'd start rustling. Until then, it's just a hilariously generic fantasy spell name.Loop Stricken said:Mirror Entity and Polymorph are hardly ubiquitous to MTG.Mark D. Stroyer said:I do mean actual namedrops. To wit, just from this article: Mirror Entity [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=141818] (as above), Polymorph [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=191380]Ferisar said:You have to understand, these spell names and card names are incredibly common. Just because Blizzard called a spell "Frostbolt" doesn't mean it's doing anything other than telling you that it is a spell that does frost shit. It's not likely that most minion cards between the two games will be the same, for instance, because the franchise and universe isn't anywhere near similar. You can blame the whole of gaming for having names that are common among fantasy spells. "Counterspell" is hardly revolutionary.
OT:
Yay Hearthstone stuff!
There's a difference from a generic, like Frostbolt, and a reference, like Glacial Ray [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=370552]. As someone who's familiar, it's...unnerving, that's all.
EDIT:
You also have to understand the people who make these games are also nerds, so it's very likely that they've been exposed to other games and common lingo among those games. Some bleed-over should be expected.
Considering that Magic hardly has a monopoly on spell names, I don't see your point. Mirror Entity as you put out may be semi-unique, but Polymorph dates back to D&D which predates both Warcraft (which introduced it in WCII) and Magic. Plus the fact that there are literally 10's of 1000's of cards in Magic, any other fantasy-style card game will probably have some overlap. Blizz is also known for subtle homage's to other geek-related culture (NPC named Linken who resembles a certain green tunic tight wearing silent protagonist, a quest chain dedicated to Plants vs. Zombies love and another quest chain that takes the old school Joust arcade game into a 3d realm). Its no wonder there'd be a few minor allusions to M:TG.Mark D. Stroyer said:I do mean actual namedrops. To wit, just from this article: Mirror Entity [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=141818] (as above), Polymorph [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=191380]Ferisar said:You have to understand, these spell names and card names are incredibly common. Just because Blizzard called a spell "Frostbolt" doesn't mean it's doing anything other than telling you that it is a spell that does frost shit. It's not likely that most minion cards between the two games will be the same, for instance, because the franchise and universe isn't anywhere near similar. You can blame the whole of gaming for having names that are common among fantasy spells. "Counterspell" is hardly revolutionary.
OT:
Yay Hearthstone stuff!
There's a difference from a generic, like Frostbolt, and a reference, like Glacial Ray [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=370552]. As someone who's familiar, it's...unnerving, that's all.
That sort of stuff will come with time. MtG is 20 years old now and Hearthstone is still in Beta. Blizzard will keep adding more cards because after all they like Wizards of the Coast really want you buying expansion packs.Mersadeon said:I will love to play Hearthstone, but I worry about longevity - there aren't a lot of cards. I'm a Magic: The Gathering player. I'm used to thousands to build fun casual decks.
I like the strategic thinking that comes from the relatively simple and smooth rules in Hearthstone, but I think I will always yearn for those crazy, rule-heavy MTG late-game hijinks. Seriously, once everyone is in some way immortal, or can't be attacked, or has some incredible big meanie on the field or gains 50 lifepoints per turn and you have to really think about combining your cards to get through - that's what I love. Hearthstone has that, but isn't quite as crazy.
The cards seem a bit too... vanilla. Pretty much the only really weird cards are legendaries, and most of the really weird legendaries are abysmal in comparison to vanilla drops.
Polymorph probably isn't a reference, I seem to recall mages having that spell in the previous Warcraft games, turned troops into sheep I think. Also polymorph is a word that means what the card says it does (at least in Magic), it's not just a name like Emrakul or Progenitus.Mark D. Stroyer said:I do mean actual namedrops. To wit, just from this article: Mirror Entity [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=141818] (as above), Polymorph [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=191380]