The vast majority of the time, a mongrel will be healthier. If the two parent breeds share similar health problems, then the cross-breed won't get it twice as bad, and there will be benefits from the more diverse genetic background of the dog. Take a labrador/Rottweiler cross, it will be quitre likely to get hip/elbow dysplasia, but the dog is less likely to get hereditary myopathy (a problem for labradors) or entropion or ectropion (eye conditions Rottweilers are vulnerable to). So a worst case crossbreed ends up in a very similar condition to a pedigree.Longshot said:That's not true. While mongrels can be a better fit for you than a pedigree, the opposite is true as well. With a pedigree, you know the type of dog you get. A mongrel can be the best from both, and no negatives... or it can be the worst of both, and no positives. There's no certainty that they get less sick, etc.SuperCombustion said:I'd seriously consider the dog thing. Do you need one? can you support one?
But if you're adamant and can't be swayed: Get a mongrel, crossbreeds are always the best. They tend to be better behaved, well rounded, easier to train, get less illnesses and have none of the complications of pedigrees. But seriously, a pedigree is a result of generations of inbreeding, you're scraping the bottom of the genetic barrel. Get a dog with less mutations. My dog's a mongrel from a rescue centre, I suggest getting one from the same place.
@OP: BTW, you should really consider what this guy here says: Are you sure you can handle a dog? If you want to get it as a pup, then you need to set aside at least your entire summer to raising it. A dog requires a lot of things, and if you can't give it all it needs, you shouldn't get a dog. It's a living creature, and has needs that must be fullfulled.
On topic, getting a dog in OP's circumstance, not a brilliant idea to be honest.