Can I join?TheDarkEricDraven said:And he did it all without MJOLNIR!
What, he didn't even teabag the guy?
Good thing the bad guy didn't run, they would have chased him down in a Mongoose!
...
I got millions of these.
Damn straight. If anyone noticed, he could legally carry a concealed weapon. I wouldn't try to carry my gun without a card in my wallet and the training I've received.teebeeohh said:before people start saying how awesome it is to carry guns to do stuff like this: he is a trained professional, i do support people like him carrying guns.
...unless of course you're the guy getting robbed or about to get murdered when some guy carrying a concealed handgun, legally, notices your situation.Kargathia said:You beat me to it, so you're indeed the first one. I guess that it's pretty much the good ol' debate as to how strict you want gun licencing to be.Andy Chalk said:I guess I'll be the first one to take the position that anybody who drives around in his spare time carrying a concealed gun and handcuffs is probably kind of an asshole.
But whatever the rules are: carrying a concealed gun is not going to get you any bonus points with me.
The story doesn't say what the situation was between the first two men. Perhaps the guy who was shot was actually being robbed? It being a parking lot of a bank and all. Without that information you can't really pass judgement on the guy who was SHOT simply because he pulled a gun. Why does it even matter? The man the Bungie employee stopped SHOT A MAN. Would you like the guy who shot you to wonder off a never be caught?orangeban said:Eh, I'm not actually that wowed by this dudes heroics. This reminds me of that thing where a burger king was robbed by an armed gunman and a customer with a gun shot the criminal, stopping the crime and it was hailed as proof of the greatness of America's loose gun control.
But in reality a man died, the customer himself was shot and the lives of everyone in the resteraunt were endangered to save a few hundred bucks.
Anyway, back to this case, I think it's a similar thing, lives were endangered to save a bank some money. Though it is slightly different since the robber had already shot someone, though that situation was different to just shooting everyone in the bank, since the someone who died had already pulled a gun.
Yeah, I'm gonna call it, this went well but it could of gone horribly, this guy got lucky, it was a bad risk.
THIS! IS! SEATTLE!TheDarkEricDraven said:He is guilty for sure, but maybe he will be penitent. If not, they don't wear halos where he is going.orangeban said:Can I join?TheDarkEricDraven said:And he did it all without MJOLNIR!
What, he didn't even teabag the guy?
Good thing the bad guy didn't run, they would have chased him down in a Mongoose!
...
I got millions of these.
Looks like that crooks going to court-ana
Let's just bypass the minor detail that I'm living in a country where you can't get a licence to carry - concealed or otherwise - and hop straight away to the principle part.MajorDolphin said:...unless of course you're the guy getting robbed or about to get murdered when some guy carrying a concealed handgun, legally, notices your situation.
Better yet, get your own permit and training and protect yourself. Much better plan than counting on someone else. Shooting at a range is also a fantastic stress reliever.
Having been someone who has been in a situation where a concealed carry weapon likely saved my life I can't imagine why people feel safe 'since you can't get a gun' well I got news you can't get a gone legally, and you know who doesn't care about laws? Criminals. So at the end of the day the criminals have the guns and you don't.Kargathia said:Let's just bypass the minor detail that I'm living in a country where you can't get a licence to carry - concealed or otherwise - and hop straight away to the principle part.
No. If I ever sufficiently feel threatened on a daily basis I'll start training judo again (and probably throw in jiu-jitsu this time), but carrying a gun definitely crosses the boundary between "able to defend yourself" and "able to inflict disproportionate amounts of physical harm".
People here don't feel safe because "you can't get a gun", they feel safer because it's relatively hard to get one, and there aren't a multitude of people legally carrying high-powered lethal weapons around.synobal said:Having been someone who has been in a situation where a concealed carry weapon likely saved my life I can't imagine why people feel safe 'since you can't get a gun' well I got news you can't get a gone legally, and you know who doesn't care about laws? Criminals. So at the end of the day the criminals have the guns and you don't.Kargathia said:Let's just bypass the minor detail that I'm living in a country where you can't get a licence to carry - concealed or otherwise - and hop straight away to the principle part.
No. If I ever sufficiently feel threatened on a daily basis I'll start training judo again (and probably throw in jiu-jitsu this time), but carrying a gun definitely crosses the boundary between "able to defend yourself" and "able to inflict disproportionate amounts of physical harm".
And before you ask it was when I was six and it was an attempted car jacking I was in the back seat and the guy decided he didn't want to steal our car once he saw the pistol my father drew.
I sorta agree with you, but for different reasons. Not to take away from the bravery of his actions, or claim he was wrong to do so, but he was a trained seurity guard, and he was armed.orangeban said:Eh, I'm not actually that wowed by this dudes heroics. This reminds me of that thing where a burger king was robbed by an armed gunman and a customer with a gun shot the criminal, stopping the crime and it was hailed as proof of the greatness of America's loose gun control.
So you think it's less of a gamble that a criminal won't blow your brains out or give you a columbian necktie, than to carry a weapon and if needed use it? Also you'll find that most gun crime doesn't happen with people who can legally carry.Kargathia said:And while you might consider yourself in lethal danger if your car is getting stolen: I don't, and I'm certainly not ready to kill somebody, merely because he's mugging me.
Exactly, like I said, the fact that the gunman already shot someone makes this a courageous and heroic gesture, whereas it would just be reckless endangerment if the gunman was merely waving the thing around and making demands.LorienvArden said:Since it is legal for him to carry a concealed firearm, I wouldn't delve further into this issue. The handcuffs ? Well, kinda odd that he had some around, but they wheren't really integral to the story. Once the gunmen dropped his weapon and got on the ground, he surrendered anyway. Without cuffs Fletcher would have had a harder time controling him, but if you have a good friend with you to keep an eye out and call the police, it's an easy procedure.danpascooch said:Given the circumstances I just described I'd be saluting him even if he got his head blown off.
This certainly was no act of vigilantism - it's civic courage. He only stopped somebody obviously commiting a crime until authorities arrived. Unless the life of somebody is in direct danger, don't even think about resisting in a robbery or engange somebody who might have a weapon on him.
Anyone without training should propably just look after the guy beeing shot AFTER the gunmen has left.
90% correct on the first part: I'd rather take a gamble on that than permanently carry a gun.synobal said:So you think it's less of a gamble that a criminal won't blow your brains out or give you a columbian necktie, than to carry a weapon and if needed use it? Also you'll find that most gun crime doesn't happen with people who can legally carry.