"Devalue the concept of gay pride"? The only value of gay/LGBT pride is showing that you shouldn't fear coming out, and usually it is show by the most flamboyant, in-your-face, dildo-toting, strap-on-swinging, members of the LGBT community. Yeah, I have some issues with LGBT pride, it's way too in your face, at least if you're trying to show someone that they aren't different because they're LGBT. It's a show, it's all meant to say "we're here, deal with it" it is meant as a reminder that some people won't stand for the shit others fling at them. So why the hell is it that only LGBT people can be pissed off about someone disliking them? Yeah, straight people might not need it as much, or barely at all, but would it outright harm the LGBT community? Is it a slippery slope? Do you have to let everyone have a Pride if you let the straights have one?Dizchu said:If people make nasty generalisations about straight people you can bet your ass I'll criticise them for doing that (especially if they are straight and should know better). But people try to equate "straight pride" with "gay pride", and all that does is devalue the concept of gay pride. We celebrate heterosexuality all the time, most media caters disproportionately to straight people to the point that featuring gay people is considered controversial. The UK is considered quite progressive, but even they censored gay themes in Steven Universe... for some reason?! I wouldn't call it blatant homophobia, but I would call it an attitude that is exclusionary against gay people. Which is exactly what gay pride is all about, it's about acknowledging one's homosexuality and not feeling ashamed about it.
I wasn't calling that a special privilege, I see a lot of people behave like it is a privilege though. "How come you get a gay pride parade and we don't get a straight pride parade?" I doubt they'd want to live in the sort of parallel universe where straight pride actually is considered necessary. There was a short film about this actually, where straight people were mocked for being "breeders". But it was meant to show homophobia from a heterosexual perspective, not show a dystopian future where being straight is considered sinful.
Probably not.
EDIT: If I come off as a bit of a dick, sorry.