#HetrosexualPrideDay

Recommended Videos

dreng3

Elite Member
Aug 23, 2011
818
465
68
Country
Denmark
Dizchu said:
If people make nasty generalisations about straight people you can bet your ass I'll criticise them for doing that (especially if they are straight and should know better). But people try to equate "straight pride" with "gay pride", and all that does is devalue the concept of gay pride. We celebrate heterosexuality all the time, most media caters disproportionately to straight people to the point that featuring gay people is considered controversial. The UK is considered quite progressive, but even they censored gay themes in Steven Universe... for some reason?! I wouldn't call it blatant homophobia, but I would call it an attitude that is exclusionary against gay people. Which is exactly what gay pride is all about, it's about acknowledging one's homosexuality and not feeling ashamed about it.

I wasn't calling that a special privilege, I see a lot of people behave like it is a privilege though. "How come you get a gay pride parade and we don't get a straight pride parade?" I doubt they'd want to live in the sort of parallel universe where straight pride actually is considered necessary. There was a short film about this actually, where straight people were mocked for being "breeders". But it was meant to show homophobia from a heterosexual perspective, not show a dystopian future where being straight is considered sinful.
"Devalue the concept of gay pride"? The only value of gay/LGBT pride is showing that you shouldn't fear coming out, and usually it is show by the most flamboyant, in-your-face, dildo-toting, strap-on-swinging, members of the LGBT community. Yeah, I have some issues with LGBT pride, it's way too in your face, at least if you're trying to show someone that they aren't different because they're LGBT. It's a show, it's all meant to say "we're here, deal with it" it is meant as a reminder that some people won't stand for the shit others fling at them. So why the hell is it that only LGBT people can be pissed off about someone disliking them? Yeah, straight people might not need it as much, or barely at all, but would it outright harm the LGBT community? Is it a slippery slope? Do you have to let everyone have a Pride if you let the straights have one?

Probably not.

EDIT: If I come off as a bit of a dick, sorry.
 

bauke67

New member
Apr 8, 2011
300
0
0
You mentioned the toiled lid war as a thing making life hard for heterosexuals everywhere(and all other sexual orietations probably).

Well, I would like to propose a solution to that:

Men should always put it up when they use it(unless they're sitting). This avoids getting the seat dirty, for any men or women looking to use it, but it does require men to touch the icky thing, which seems a fair enough trade off.

Men should not put it down however, women should do this themselves. This means women will have to touch the toilet seat, but it is in their own self interest, as it means having a place to sit.

This division of labour ensures each sex does only 50% percent of the toilet touching, while ensuring minimal spillage and maximum seating comfort. Moreover, it only requires that men sometimes touch it in situations where it is not necissarilly in their self-interest(when they don't intend to sit on it later).

Problem solved.
 

chocolate pickles

New member
Apr 14, 2011
432
0
0
JimB said:
chocolate pickles said:
Makes perfect sense. If we have gay pride, we definitely deserve straight pride. This is equality in action.
Are you being facetious? Because it kind of comes off like, "If a white guy dies in a fire, then we should set a black guy on fire too so the same thing happened to both races. That's equality;" ignoring the context of those two situations (one being an accident and one a deliberate homicide) to declare them equal.
No. I'm saying that if we take pride in one type of sexuality, we should take pride in all types.

Equal representation and pride does not equate to burning people. That's ludicrous.
 

Dizchu

...brutal
Sep 23, 2014
1,277
0
0
shinyelf said:
"Devalue the concept of gay pride"? The only value of gay/LGBT pride is showing that you shouldn't fear coming out, and usually it is show by the most flamboyant, in-your-face, dildo-toting, strap-on-swinging, members of the LGBT community. Yeah, I have some issues with LGBT pride, it's way too in your face, at least if you're trying to show someone that they aren't different because they're LGBT. It's a show, it's all meant to say "we're here, deal with it" it is meant as a reminder that some people won't stand for the shit others fling at them. So why the hell is it that only LGBT people can be pissed off about someone disliking them? Yeah, straight people might not need it as much, or barely at all, but would it outright harm the LGBT community? Is it a slippery slope? Do you have to let everyone have a Pride if you let the straights have one?

Probably not.
I wouldn't say that a "straight pride" parade would necessarily harm LGBT people (though I'm willing to bet that any straight pride parade is gonna attract homophobia), but I'm not gonna ignore how redundant a concept it is.
 

StatusNil

New member
Oct 5, 2014
534
0
0
Good to see so many people earnestly getting into the spirit of Get Trolled On Twitter Day.

Anyway, straights are a part of the LGBTSC community. Have a good 'un, folks!
 

dreng3

Elite Member
Aug 23, 2011
818
465
68
Country
Denmark
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
First off, I was gonna respond to your other post, but wifi shenanigans and a reboot caused the post to be eaten. Dizchu though made my point better, but not perfectly. LGBT pride events are earned by the discrimination, they're an expression of the necessity of visibility and dispelling ignorance. Your response to what I said to THM, well it was putting words in my mouth, or at least making leaps of logic based on what I said in response to another person's post... I was challenging THM on the point that they jumped into political affiliation, as if being gay is a political stance, or that basic civil rights are negotiable because people on one side of the political spectrum think another group's existence is immoral.

Anyways most people who hate GSM[footnote]Gender and Sexuality Minorities[/footnote] folk aren't idiots, most of them are ignorant, in the absence of any real experience, or education, they default to fear. Then the real scum bags exploit that fear, because those people decided to hate a group for arbitrary reasons. Those people aren't idiots either, they're very savvy manipulators, who use people's lack of understanding to breed hate.

Still pride isn't so much about celebrating being Gay, Lesbian, Transgender, Bisexual, Asexual, Intersex, or whatever else... It's about being visible, about standing up proudly against a culture that tells us to be ashamed of ourselves, it's about making a stand against ignorance and hatred. That's what pride events are about, they're about being proud to be ourselves despite the hatred, shaming, and prejudice. That's also what makes the concept of "straight pride" and "cis pride" absurd and insulting, because cisgender straight folk are accepted by society and permeate every level of culture. Cisgender heterosexual people simply don't need a visibility event, because they're already visible and accepted.
First (this one can be ignored): Good thing I love hearing my own voice, albeit the internal one, because this thread requires a whole lot of responses.

Second (this is where i address your points): Something being earned by discrimination is bullshit, unless you yourself have suffered it is a ridiculous notion that you have some special place in society. I do, however, acknowledge that quite a lot of people from the GSM (so that's the hip new slang, I really should keep up with my acronyms. Easier than Writing LGBT-alphabetsoup though), have suffered actual discrimination, what I've experienced is mainly internet bullshit. Oh, and what is the expiration date on discrimination by the way? To what generation should we pay for the sins of the father, or the mother if we're doing the equality thing?

I think hate is a funny word, and I'm pretty sure that it isn't what we're dealing with. To me it have always seemed like the entire issue was more one of fear, like a form of xenophobia. And like every form of xenophobia this one is abused by those who want power.

The entire pride thing still seems strange to me, why do we need to parade our differences? I wouldn't be able to tell if you were GSM or straight at a glance (unless I spot you in the middle of a pride parade wearing a rainbow unitard), so why is it important to scream it from the rooftops? The most common reason is that it encourages others to acknowledge that they're part of the GMS community, but if that was the case then why isn't it as important to acknowledge that some people might need to affirm that they're straight? Because the GSM is, as the acronym denotes, a minority? Seems like a straight idea, doesn't it? Sure, the world needs to loosen up and allow more content depicting GSM characters/people, but that would be another issue.

As I probably mentioned somewhere else, I, as a white, straight, male, don't get a lot of opportunities to celebrate myself, and to be honest I'm feeling pretty shat on this week. A nod of encouragement, however it might come, would be very appreciated. So yeah, I'd take most chances I got to get out on the street and have people give a cheer, or just sit in my chair and imagine that someone on the internet is giving a thumbs-up.

In all honesty, straight pride is a completely demented idea, but I think the same holds true for any event that encourages people to make on their gender or sexuality the core of their identity, so I figure that if we're going to keep doing one pride we might as well do the other.
 

dreng3

Elite Member
Aug 23, 2011
818
465
68
Country
Denmark
Dizchu said:
I wouldn't say that a "straight pride" parade would necessarily harm LGBT people (though I'm willing to bet that any straight pride parade is gonna attract homophobia), but I'm not gonna ignore how redundant a concept it is.
I'd refer to my latest response to KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime, but making the point clear seems a good idea.
Straight pride is, to use the words of the beloved Ben Croshaw, pants-on-head-retarded, flashing you sexuality like that is moronic beyond comprehension, but if it makes some people feel good about themselves then we should go for it. While pride is in fact my favourite sin (I like them all except for envy, never could get that one down), I feel that we're showing of disproportionately, GSM, black, women, go have your parades. Straight, white, latino, asian, fuck off. Yeah, seems reasonable. If someone can pull off a pride without riots (looking at you black pride(and football fans)), I really don't think we need to get in the way of it.
 

Stewie Plisken

New member
Jan 3, 2009
355
0
0
How on God's green Earth did this topic become serious? It's a topic about a troll hashtag. It's not a real thing. It's like Meninism. Let it go.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,994
118
Stewie Plisken said:
How on God's green Earth did this topic become serious? It's a topic about a troll hashtag. It's not a real thing. It's like Meninism. Let it go.
You clearly haven't been paying much attention to this website for a while if you genuinely asked that question.
 

dreng3

Elite Member
Aug 23, 2011
818
465
68
Country
Denmark
undeadsuitor said:
Yes, but they're the type of idiots in power.

If a gay person makes a slight against a straight person on tumblr, nothing is going to happen.

If homophobic and transphobic individuals make up a large portion of this country's governing body, something is going to happen.

Nobodies shooting up a bar because they hate straight people.
True, but then again, nobody shoots up a bar because they hate GSM people either, they shoot up bars because they're bugfuck crazy. Yeah, I'm not talking mentally ill, I'm talking fucked up because of nurture, not nature. Or because they don't know any better, I guess. Same reason people do horrible things in general, pratcically nobody does something horrible because they hate somebody, they do it because they're messed up wastes of space.
 

NiPah

New member
May 8, 2009
1,084
0
0
undeadsuitor said:
shinyelf said:
Isn't the hate of gay people mainly amongst idiots?
Yes, but they're the type of idiots in power.

If a gay person makes a slight against a straight person on tumblr, nothing is going to happen.

If homophobic and transphobic individuals make up a large portion of this country's governing body, something is going to happen.

Nobodies shooting up a bar because they hate straight people.
Not yet at least, just wait until we elect a gay person into office, then we'll see straight bars getting shot up too!
 

dreng3

Elite Member
Aug 23, 2011
818
465
68
Country
Denmark
NiPah said:
Not yet at least, just wait until we elect a gay person into office, then we'll see straight bars getting shot up too!
Slippery slope, right. Let GSM people practice politics like straight people and suddenly they will want to spree-kill like straight people. Slippery slopes.

I should probably add that I'm being sarcastic.
 

FPLOON

Your #1 Source for the Dino Porn
Jul 10, 2013
12,530
0
0
Eh... I'm too queer to celebrate that particular day and I'm definitely too asexual to celebrate the attraction of the rule 63 equivalent to my so-called gender... Sorry, Twitter... Maybe when Snickers Pride comes around...

Other than that, since all my irl straight friends don't have Twitter, they're clearly missing out... :p
 

FirstNameLastName

Premium Fraud
Nov 6, 2014
1,080
0
0
I'm having trouble deciding which is more pointless; the fact that this hashtag exists, or the fact that people are getting this upset about it. Then again, it's a hashtag that exists, so of course it's a cesspit of hostility.
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,804
0
0
Ah yes, this. For the people who are serious about it it can also be called #WayToMissThePointGuysDay.
 

Stewie Plisken

New member
Jan 3, 2009
355
0
0
undeadsuitor said:
No.

No no.

The Orlando Shooter was homophobic. His coworker confirmed he was homophobic. His family confirmed he was homophobic.

He scouted out several other gay bars in the area for that exact purpose. He went in when it was at it's most crowded. He. wanted. to. kill. gay. people. because. he. hated. them.

at least do 30 seconds of research before trying to claim that bad people do bad things for no reason.

this utterly ugly dismissal of the truth is exactly why 'gay pride' is needed.
I know I said to move on, but isn't this a bit disingenuous? He was homophobic, but there was a source for that homophobia, right?
 

shrekfan246

Not actually a Japanese pop star
May 26, 2011
6,367
0
0
shinyelf said:
undeadsuitor said:
Yes, but they're the type of idiots in power.

If a gay person makes a slight against a straight person on tumblr, nothing is going to happen.

If homophobic and transphobic individuals make up a large portion of this country's governing body, something is going to happen.

Nobodies shooting up a bar because they hate straight people.
True, but then again, nobody shoots up a bar because they hate GSM people either, they shoot up bars because they're bugfuck crazy. Yeah, I'm not talking mentally ill, I'm talking fucked up because of nurture, not nature. Or because they don't know any better, I guess. Same reason people do horrible things in general, pratcically nobody does something horrible because they hate somebody, they do it because they're messed up wastes of space.
People do horrible things based off of hatred and fear all the time. As undeadsuitor already pointed out, most of the people who spoke up and knew the Orlando shooter believed him to be homophobic due to events they witnessed in person. Eliot Rodger didn't write 140 or however many pages of his wildly misogynistic "manifesto" before going on a shooting spree because he was "crazy"; he did it because he hated women, and he hated men that he perceived to be more successful with women than he was. If he was "crazy", none of that incredibly strange text would've ever existed, because he wouldn't have had any reason to write or post it. Anders Breivik didn't blow up a van and shoot down a load of people at a summer camp because he's "crazy"; he did it because he's a militant nationalist who has an extreme hatred for Muslims.

Trans people are still routinely beaten and even killed for the crime of being transgender. A disturbing number of men have made careers for themselves on the internet whinging about how evil women are to other men, and winding conspiracy theories about how the Jews have control over everything. Sexual violence against women still largely goes unreported, because the police forces tend to treat it like a joke, and even if they don't blame the woman for being assaulted, you can be damn sure that people in the general public will if the story actually gets reported for whatever reason.

You can try to say that you're not claiming they're "mentally ill", but by associating them with "crazy" people that's exactly what you're doing. There are very real, very measurable reasons for why somebody might grow up to hate gay people, or trans people, or women, or black people, or Muslims, or anything else you care to mention, which you even allude to by saying that it's nurture rather than nature. But saying that they're "crazy" not only throws everyone with mental illness under the bus so that you can feel comfortable under the belief that "normal" people can't do something like that, it also completely erases the fact that "normal" people do stuff like this constantly. There's a reason that "he was always so quiet"/"he always seemed so nice" is a trope when it comes to describing sudden murderers.
 

anthony87

New member
Aug 13, 2009
3,727
0
0
Stewie Plisken said:
How on God's green Earth did this topic become serious?
Because people need something to decry and feel self-rightous and smug about decrying.

C'mon man, it's par for the course around here.
 

JimB

New member
Apr 1, 2012
2,180
0
0
Zontar said:
But this isn't people murdering someone to make things equal with the death of another, it's taking pride in something you did nothing to achieve
chocolate pickles said:
I'm saying that if we take pride in one type of sexuality
God damn it, guys, seriously, at least four people in this thread (and I think I saw one more while I was scrolling between these posts to quote these two) have already said Gay Pride is not about being proud of one's orientation, but of being proud enough not to hide that orientation in the closet in the face of a world where being gay is stigmatized. At least four people have said that, maybe five. I'm honestly asking, is there even a point to me continuing to talk to people about this? Because it feels very much like people intend to ignore the entire context of gay marginalization in society to assert some ridiculous narrative with no basis in anything other than one's own preconceptions, and if that's the way it's gonna fucking be, I need to know so I can bow out now. I legitimately do not have the emotional stamina today to deal with people who think gay pride is about nothing more than liking how one's genitals interact with another's.
 

Stewie Plisken

New member
Jan 3, 2009
355
0
0
shrekfan246 said:
What.

'Crazy' doesn't mean one thing. 'Crazy' doesn't mean incoherent, unable to write a manifesto or a note or frame a motive. A severely maladjusted person is mentally ill. You cannot promote social injustice by minimizing and dismantling mental health in the name of social justice. This is insane. It's actually dangerous. What are you doing?! You're doing the thing you're claiming to not be doing! There are degrees of mental illness! By referring to those who commit hate crimes as 'normal', you essentially move the issue away from mental health and into empty buzzwords! The Orlando shooter may have been gay. This would point to self-hatred. THIS WOULD MAKE IT A MENTAL HEALTH ISSUE.