*Raises hand to bring up BFF's Europa Universalis and Hearts of Iron.*
Iwata said:
Please bear in mind, leave out hardcore simulators or grand strategy games. I'm talking about more accessible games in a variety of genres. That means no Total War, Hearts of Iron, etc.
http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/142/465/okay+gif+i+got+bored+and+i+needed+a+okay_2d3314_2295970.gif
Well, I never had a problem with all the WW2-shooters back when they still... Y'know, existed. I rather liked the formula, and I've got many good memories from Call of Duty 2. Hell, plonk me back down in Battlefield 1942 and I'd probably get right back in the groove. The problem, as I saw (and see) it was that they were all too generic, all with the same controls and mechanics.
There were always an Omaha-level, a few Soviet levels, maybe a few in Africa, but the majority of the WW2-games just felt like a long stretch of French villages and cackling nazis. It just got too formulaic at the end of it all. They could have livened it up a bit more. Hell, EA was on to something good with Battlefield Heroes, but they let that opportunity slip by completly.
Now, we've got loads of identical present day shooters, instead! Progress!
