Recently, Hitman (2016) came to GOG.com. For those of you uninitiated, GOG.com is an online game store owned by CD Projekt Red, and is known for having games that are DRM-free. However, while technically you can play offline, Hitman severely takes away many features, such as unlocking weapons, items, outfits, starting locations and more are locked behind an online requirement.
While it can be argued that it's IO Interactive's fault for making the game this way, people are mad that GOG store page does not explain in detail what DRM-free means for this game. What initially started as a strong-reviewd game quickly turned into the average score of 1.3/5, many users criticizing the problem with not-so-DRM-free nature of the game.
The forum page, of course, was filled with angry responses. One of the staff members then threntened to remove bad reviews that incites review bombing. He/she did acknowledge the issue, and let the people know that those who purchased it have the option to refund.
It's been a few days since the post, and it looks like GOG didn't remove a ton of reviews; Because the game is still at a low score. While I'm sure they'll do their best to leave constructive criticisms alone, I can only imagine having power to do so can alter how the game is perceieved
While it can be argued that it's IO Interactive's fault for making the game this way, people are mad that GOG store page does not explain in detail what DRM-free means for this game. What initially started as a strong-reviewd game quickly turned into the average score of 1.3/5, many users criticizing the problem with not-so-DRM-free nature of the game.
The forum page, of course, was filled with angry responses. One of the staff members then threntened to remove bad reviews that incites review bombing. He/she did acknowledge the issue, and let the people know that those who purchased it have the option to refund.
It's been a few days since the post, and it looks like GOG didn't remove a ton of reviews; Because the game is still at a low score. While I'm sure they'll do their best to leave constructive criticisms alone, I can only imagine having power to do so can alter how the game is perceieved