However, I think we can all agree that it was probably just a small mistake and it's not worth making a fuss over.OANST said:I assumed that he was making a comparison of a year that that they had full data on to an upcoming year's scheduled releases. However, I think you're right.Tzekelkan said:Actually, he probably meant 2010, otherwise the comparison to 2009 makes no sense.OANST said:I take it you meant to say 2011, right?Logan Westbrook said:The LA Times [http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/movies/la-fi-ct-moviegames-20100615,0,2639964.story] reports that 15 tie-in games were released in 2009, versus the eleven scheduled for 2001.
At what point do I start getting paid for editing everyone in this site's articles?
I now demand you send me any money you may receive.
I think that we can all agree that this site's editor either can't read or just doesn't bother to.