HoloLens Headsets Destroyed in SpaceX Rocket Explosion

Lizzy Finnegan

New member
Mar 11, 2015
1,650
0
0
HoloLens Headsets Destroyed in SpaceX Rocket Explosion


The unmanned SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, which carried more than 2 tons of supplies including two HoloLens headsets, was airborne for mere minutes before exploding Sunday morning.

The rocket, named Dragon, exploded 139 seconds after its launch from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida on Sunday morning. Dragon was carrying supplies to the International Space Station, where three astronauts currently have enough supplies left to last them four months. This marks the third failed resupply attempt in the last nine months.

Elon Musk, SpaceX's founder, tweeted [https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/615185076813459456] Sunday morning that there had been "an overpressure event in the upper stage liquid oxygen tank. Data suggests counterintuitive cause."

"That's all we can say with confidence right now," Musk continued [https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/615185689999765504]. "Will have more to say following a thorough fault tree analysis."

In a news conference, NASA Associate Administrator William Gerstenmaier said "This was a blow to us. We lost a lot of important research equipment on this flight." The rocket, which debuted in 2010 and had 18 successful flights prior to its demise, carried more than 2 tons of food and equipment, including a replacement water filtration system, a spacesuit, and docking adapter. However, he stressed "from a macro level standpoint, the crew is in no danger."

Also on board the rocket were two HoloLens headsets, intended to help develop a new program named Sidekick [http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-microsoft-collaborate-to-bring-science-fiction-to-science-fact].

"Sidekick has two modes of operation. The first is "Remote Expert Mode," which uses Skype, part of Microsoft, to allow a ground operator to see what a crew member sees, provide real-time guidance, and draw annotations into the crew member's environment to coach him or her through a task," the NASA press release [http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-microsoft-collaborate-to-bring-science-fiction-to-science-fact] reads. "Until now, crew members have relied on written and voice instructions when performing complex repair tasks or experiments."

"The second mode is "Procedure Mode," which augments standalone procedures with animated holographic illustrations displayed on top of the objects with which the crew is interacting. This capability could lessen the amount of training that future crews will require and could be an invaluable resource for missions deep into our solar system, where communication delays complicate difficult operations."

Two Russian cosmonauts and an American astronaut are currently aboard ISS. More cargo missions are planned this summer, including Russian flights on July 3 and July 22, and a Japanese launch on August 16.

An investigation into the explosion will ground the Falcon 9 rockets for "a number of months or so" according to SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell.

"This is a reminder that spaceflight is an incredible challenge, but we learn from each success and each setback," NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in a statement. "Today's launch attempt will not deter us from our ambitious human spaceflight program."

Scott Kelly, the American astronaut on the ISS, stated "Day 93 Today was a reminder spaceflight is hard. Tomorrow is a new day. Good night from @space_station #YearInSpace" via tweet [https://twitter.com/StationCDRKelly/status/615285756571971584] Sunday.

You can watch the full post-launch briefing below.



Permalink
 

Scars Unseen

^ ^ v v < > < > B A
May 7, 2009
3,028
0
0
That's a shame. But good that it was an unmanned rocket. Equipment can be replaced. Rocket designs can be revised.
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
17,382
10,145
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
I've commented before that one of the hardest parts of science is learning as much from the failures as from the successes. Well... if nothing else, this is one hell of a learning opportunity.
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
All rocket talk aside, those both sound like very practical applications for augmented reality tech, and I'm happy to learn such things are already in the works.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Silk_Sk said:
Anyone else think the Russians did it?
No. That would be silly conspiracy theory nonsense. The Russians don't stand to gain anything from this failing.

OT: Argh. I hope they nail this whole "actually going to space" thing soon.
 

EndlessSporadic

New member
May 20, 2009
276
0
0
"This marks the third failed resupply attempt in the last nine months."

Anyone else smell incompetency? I know this is rocket science, but this shouldn't be happening.
 

VanQ

Casual Plebeian
Oct 23, 2009
2,729
0
0
Silk_Sk said:
Anyone else think the Russians did it?
Let me point you to this point in the article.
Two Russian cosmonauts and an American astronaut are currently aboard ISS.
Cosmonauts are an extremely valuable national asset. There is no way Russia would profit from endangering two of them with only 4 months of supplies remaining.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Silk_Sk said:
Anyone else think the Russians did it?
It would be a little hard to do that. Dr. No hasn't exactly been around, lately. I doubt there's a secret cadre of Russian agents in Florida, messing it all up.

OT: It's rough, but they'll have to make it soon. Either that, or somebody's gotta come down...
 

gridsleep

New member
Sep 27, 2008
299
0
0
Overpressure event, meaning the pressure release valve failed to release pressure in the LOX tank as the rocket went higher into the atmosphere. Counterintuitive cause is BS for "unexpected." Well, as they say, "NSS." No one expects a catastrophic failure unless one is planning to clean up in the insurance racket. One would think in a world of, minimally, triple checks, that any mistake, however minute, would only be expected to happen at most once. One would also expect that after fifty years of experience sending a chemical rocket into orbit would be so mundane as to be as fault free as a bus ride to the park. One must always be prepared for disappointment, it appears, especially public disappointment in the mental acuity of rocket scientists.
 

gridsleep

New member
Sep 27, 2008
299
0
0
Wiggum Esquilax said:
I'm 99% sure that at least some of that rocket reached orbit.
No, not at that altitude, even with the extra thrust of an explosion. All fall down, go boom.
 

gridsleep

New member
Sep 27, 2008
299
0
0
FalloutJack said:
Silk_Sk said:
Anyone else think the Russians did it?
It would be a little hard to do that. Dr. No hasn't exactly been around, lately. I doubt there's a secret cadre of Russian agents in Florida, messing it all up.

OT: It's rough, but they'll have to make it soon. Either that, or somebody's gotta come down...
Dr. No was Asian, most likely Chinese but possibly Korean.
 

RicoADF

Welcome back Commander
Jun 2, 2009
3,147
0
0
Looks like a re-enactment of one of my launches in KSP (pick one of many). Glad no-one was hurt, the parts and supplies can be replaced a person can not. Also interesting news about the holo lens, although alittle concerned about the "less training" part.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
gridsleep said:
FalloutJack said:
Silk_Sk said:
Anyone else think the Russians did it?
It would be a little hard to do that. Dr. No hasn't exactly been around, lately. I doubt there's a secret cadre of Russian agents in Florida, messing it all up.

OT: It's rough, but they'll have to make it soon. Either that, or somebody's gotta come down...
Dr. No was Asian, most likely Chinese but possibly Korean.
Yes, I know that, but I needed to reference the villain using a facility to disrupt space launches. Beggers can't be choosers.
 

Silk_Sk

New member
Mar 25, 2009
502
0
0
VanQ said:
Silk_Sk said:
Anyone else think the Russians did it?
Let me point you to this point in the article.
Two Russian cosmonauts and an American astronaut are currently aboard ISS.
Cosmonauts are an extremely valuable national asset. There is no way Russia would profit from endangering two of them with only 4 months of supplies remaining.
I don't really think they did it. But wouldn't the Russians have a lot to gain by keeping America dependent on their space program?
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,988
118
Yeah, I'm not too worried about this. The space program is risky business, and NASA blew up tons of things along the way as they perfected their system.
 

Gatlank

New member
Aug 26, 2014
190
0
0
Dynast Brass said:
The Soviets taught us all those lessons the hard way, with hundreds of their own people burned to ash.
[citation needed]

I would put it on a handful or maybe dozens (if including animals).
"Hundreds" unlikely.
 

ForumSafari

New member
Sep 25, 2012
572
0
0
EndlessSporadic said:
Anyone else smell incompetency? I know this is rocket science, but this shouldn't be happening.
Oh? How good are your rockets?

Sniping aside part of the SpaceX programme is designing cheaper, private sector usable items in a field which is right at the edge of our engineering ability as it is.