Horoscopes

Recommended Videos

51gunner

New member
Jun 12, 2008
583
0
0
I'm a Taurus, and that couldn't be farther from the truth. I'm not a romantic, and certainly no artist.

There might be some grounding from the time of the year that you were born in, just based on the fact that your first memories might be snow, or heat, or whatever. Also possible that kids who would be the oldest in their class/youngest/middle or such, but there's no real proof. I don't hold much faith in starsigns and such.
 

Lvl 64 Klutz

Crowsplosion!
Apr 8, 2008
2,338
0
0
I'm a pure Aquarius, through and through. My girlfriend is within Pisces, but leans more towards Aries (which is odd, since she was born closer to Pisces than I was to Aquarius). And in case you couldn't tell, yes I do believe there's something to astrology.
 

Bulletinmybrain

New member
Jun 22, 2008
3,277
0
0
scumofsociety said:
I have to try very hard not to laugh when people start talking about starsigns, horoscopes and the like.
No, you havn't seen it until they start talking about the gods lol.
 

jim_doki

New member
Mar 29, 2008
1,942
0
0
i'm a scorpio (nov 13) and apparently i'm amazingly typical of the scorpios. im artistic, loud, opinionated, uncomprimising, honest, passionate and easily irritated
 

TMAN10112

New member
Jul 4, 2008
1,492
0
0
I'm a vergo, I always belived in horoscopes a little, but when I read that I just thought: "holy crap, that's just like me!".
 

Ken Korda

New member
Nov 21, 2008
306
0
0
How are star signs supposed to work? Are we meant to believe that planets are affecting our personalities? What is the justification for this beleif system?
 

pieeater911

New member
Jun 27, 2008
577
0
0
My life and how my day is going to turn out is not controlled by the movements of giant burning balls of plasma billions of light years away from me.

Every now and again I'll read the horoscopes in the newspaper, just to see what they think my day will be like. About ninety-nine percent of the time the horoscope is very, very off.
 

CIA

New member
Sep 11, 2008
1,013
0
0
Is it okay if none of the good points describe me but all of the bad? From the site I mean.
 

Khedive Rex

New member
Jun 1, 2008
1,253
0
0
Yes, I believe in astrology. No, I don't believe in horoscopes.

When threads like this roll around I always feel like I should try to defend astrology.
Aardvark post=18.79481.1014420 said:
I love people who believe in astrology. One of the first things they ask when talking to you for the first time is, "What's your star sign?"

My response: "Guess"

So far, I've had none who have managed to guess my starsign with one guess and several who have had to go through the whole horrorscope before hitting the right one.
That's because 90% of people who practise "astrology" actually practise "horoscope memorization". They internalize that Scorpio's are deep and thoughtful and that Leo's are proud and flamboyant ect, without bothering to study any actual astrological processes.

Horoscopes deal solely with sun signs. You have nine other planets (potentially more if you want to include important asteroids and sub planets like Eris) which can be in twelve other houses with a different ruling sign per house that will affect not only the meaning of the planet but the meaning of it's interactions with other planets. The planets have affects on each other determined by relative position, and they can be overlapping and extremely numrous and all of them have to be accounted for and planets can be in retrograde which will give the planet an entirely different meaning and -

Well, I guess I'm trying to say it's complicated.

I've studied astrology for a couple years now and my current record for guessing star signs is six people guessed correctly in a row. Perhaps we balance each other out?

AuntyEthel post=18.79481.1014430 said:
I don't follow it, as I cannot believe that everyone born within a month's range will have similar personalities. Horoscopes were invented years ago by people who didn't have science to explain explainable occurences.
They won't. The affect of the star sign is mitigated by the almost infinite other factors in a legitimate astrological reading. What they will typically have is something in common. It's ussually less about personality and more about additude and multiple kinds of additudes can be attributed to a single sign.

Horoscopes really over simplify the entire process and give the impression that everyone born on the same month will be a little clone of each other. This is of course completely ridiculous. However, certain qualities will be more prevalent in people born at one time than other times.

Xaryn Mar post=18.79481.1014710 said:
Well, since the star signs (or constellations as they are known as) are products of the human imagination and desire to see shapes in things (called pareidolia) they have no influence on us. Besides all the constellations have moved a sign in the approximately 4000 years since the constellations as we known them now where created (I can't remember which way though) add to this the fact that there is actually 13 constellations that the planets and sun passes through, and which the astrologers doesn't use.

And this is just a few of the problems with astrology. For a more thorough explanation I will direct you to Dr. Phil Plaits badastronomy blog (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/), just search around a bit and you'll find information from a great skeptic.
You are aware that there isn't just one kind of astrology right? Sidereal astrology for example moves it's signs and houses to align with the current positions of constellations in the sky. Derivations of sidereal astrology also use Ophiuchus, the thirteenth sign. Almost all western astrologers use the tropical zodiac with equal angle houses (the kind of astrology you're most likely use to) but astrological systems exist that incorporate almost anything you could want. Different systems are better for divining different things; they all have their various uses.

As far as I can tell, your complaint is less with astrology and more that astrology has not presented a united front.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Before dismissing astrology out of hand because a couple bored incompetent staff writers decided it'd be fun to pretend the entirety of humanity could fit into 12 boxes, I'd encourage all of you to give astrology a legitamate researching. My first foray into astrology was purely for the purpose of figuring out why people thought it worked so I could show exactly why it didn't. Today, I still haven't figured out why it works but I'm pretty resolute that it does.
 

Aardvark

New member
Sep 9, 2008
1,721
0
0
The correct response would have been to guess.

The only possible use I could have for studying astrology is to pick up. So many hot girls I know believe in it and I'm sure if I could harness it for evil, instead of silly, I'd be totally in.
 

Khedive Rex

New member
Jun 1, 2008
1,253
0
0
Aardvark said:
The correct response would have been to guess.

The only possible use I could have for studying astrology is to pick up. So many hot girls I know believe in it and I'm sure if I could harness it for evil, instead of silly, I'd be totally in.
I'd have to meet you in person. A cartoon and a couple lines of text aren't exactly evidence hotspots. Alternately you could tell me a Whole Lot about yourself and I could try guessing but... this is the internet after all.

And as for picking up women, yes. Astrology is one of the best ways I know to break the ice.
 

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,075
0
0
The way I see it, belief in horoscopes serves as a very useful flag for someone's sense of intellectual integrity. The women I've known who think astrology is science are pretty much universally in "human pie crust" levels of flake territory.

Besides, the only horoscope you'll ever need has already been done. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mI7zewjyJiI]
 

Xaryn Mar

New member
Sep 17, 2008
697
0
0
Khedive Rex said:
Xaryn Mar post=18.79481.1014710 said:
You are aware that there isn't just one kind of astrology right? Sidereal astrology for example moves it's signs and houses to align with the current positions of constellations in the sky. Derivations of sidereal astrology also use Ophiuchus, the thirteenth sign. Almost all western astrologers use the tropical zodiac with equal angle houses (the kind of astrology you're most likely use to) but astrological systems exist that incorporate almost anything you could want. Different systems are better for divining different things; they all have their various uses.

As far as I can tell, your complaint is less with astrology and more that astrology has not presented a united front.
No my complaint aout astrology is that it is not based on science. It always falls to the ground when tested via scientific methods, otherwise a lot of astrologers would have claimed James Randi's one million Dollar reward.
Besides this, if the planets of the solar system should have an effect, why didn't the astrologers prove e.g. Pluto, Eris or Quoar before they were discovered? They should have been able to tell that they were there due to the influence they would have. And what about the 100+ exoplanets discovered within the last 10 years? They should have an effect as well.

The only way I see that astrology can have any effect is through placebo, i.e. you are so convinced that it will be true that you unconsciously make it happen (or close enough to it that you can point at the horoscope and say: "See it was right").

Until astrology can stand up to scientific testing, I call humbug.
 

AuntyEthel

New member
Sep 19, 2008
664
0
0
Khedive Rex said:
AuntyEthel post=18.79481.1014430 said:
I don't follow it, as I cannot believe that everyone born within a month's range will have similar personalities. Horoscopes were invented years ago by people who didn't have science to explain explainable occurences.
They won't. The affect of the star sign is mitigated by the almost infinite other factors in a legitimate astrological reading. What they will typically have is something in common. It's ussually less about personality and more about additude and multiple kinds of additudes can be attributed to a single sign.

Horoscopes really over simplify the entire process and give the impression that everyone born on the same month will be a little clone of each other. This is of course completely ridiculous. However, certain qualities will be more prevalent in people born at one time than other times.
Yeah, I do understand that (the topic is horoscopes, not astrology, but niggling is pointless and won't prove anything). I know a lot of people put faith into astrology, but the skeptic in me will always dismiss it. I do share many traits with a typical Scorpio, but then again, I share many traits with every other star sign.
 

MSORPG pl4y3r

New member
Aug 7, 2008
244
0
0
I'm a Libra, and this described me perfectly, I'v always said "my starsign describes me very well." and this is the closet I'v ever seen. I am very intrested in the whole Zodiac sign thing.
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
Wow mine could be no further from my personality. People actually read this crap daily? It's all so generic and common sense.

"You will have a good day though struggles will arise, someone you speak to might have an interest in you. Also now is a good time to be assertive when a situation arises. Do something for yourself and you will feel good about it."

I think I covered all my bases... now if I could get someone to pay for my horoscope of their life...