My main critique would be that the content of the article doesn't appear to match up with, or support, the premise/title. This is more a discussion of why the author liked Alien (and that type of movie) more than Aliens (and that type of movie). There is no actual discussion of the Alien franchise as a whole - no mention of the last two Alien movies, the AvPs, or the really terrible Prometheus (to say nothing of videogames or anything else that could be considered a part of the Franchise) and the influence that the second movie may have had on them (e.g. just about all of the subsequent properties except for Alien 3 and Prometheus were more like Aliens than Alien, for better or for worse).
If the article was titled "Alien Was A Better Movie Than Aliens" or something along those lines, it wouldn't have tripped my cognitive dissonance and prompted me to comment. As it is, from my reading it states that it's going one place and then runs off in a different direction. Not an inherently bad direction, but I wind up feeling like I was victim of a bait-and-switch.
If the article was titled "Alien Was A Better Movie Than Aliens" or something along those lines, it wouldn't have tripped my cognitive dissonance and prompted me to comment. As it is, from my reading it states that it's going one place and then runs off in a different direction. Not an inherently bad direction, but I wind up feeling like I was victim of a bait-and-switch.