How Big is Too Big?
- Thread starter Paragon Fury
- Start date
If they can't buy clothing without shopping specialty stores on the internet...probably too big.
If they aren't obese and I can't get my arms around them...probably too big.
If they start knocking over my furniture (like a coat rack)...probably too big.
There's also a rift here between too big as an inconvenience and too big to be attractive. The examples I gave up above are those of inconvenience (and it appears that the first two pics are in that category).
However, I feel that they stop being attractive when they start looking comical (when compared to their body size). To me, it's when they start to get "boob folds" like you see in the OP's third examples (always appears next to the armpit). It's sort of like folds in fat...not attractive.
If they aren't obese and I can't get my arms around them...probably too big.
If they start knocking over my furniture (like a coat rack)...probably too big.
There's also a rift here between too big as an inconvenience and too big to be attractive. The examples I gave up above are those of inconvenience (and it appears that the first two pics are in that category).
However, I feel that they stop being attractive when they start looking comical (when compared to their body size). To me, it's when they start to get "boob folds" like you see in the OP's third examples (always appears next to the armpit). It's sort of like folds in fat...not attractive.
Your wish is my command.Aaron Sylvester said:For me being natural is the first priority, and coming in at a close second is proportion. A woman can look sexy as hell with both small or large breasts, in the end "physical beauty" to me is a sum of all it's parts.
I have a question about those saying super-huge boobs can cause back pain - shouldn't the back naturally strengthen itself to support assuming the breats are natural? I mean they don't just go *poof* and suddenly become huge one day, getting to that size can take several years during teens (or even early 20's) so shouldn't the back automatically become strong enough to support it?
Now lets start an equivalent thread about male penis size and how big is "too big". I think it would be a vastly more interesting topic
Also, on topic:
There can never be too big a cake.
Breast size depends on proportions I would say.
So it's better to judge o a case by case basis.
B and C are mostly great looking
A and D have exceptions when they also look good
AA are just too non-existent (seriously my own chest muscles are bigger than that)
DD looks too impractical
DDD and anything bigger just creeps me out
P.S. On a side note- does women with AA and A size breasts really need bras? Because you don't see guys with well developed chest muscles to be wearing bras.
Simply because when you see a woman on a street you can with certain degree say what size her breasts are
When you see a man you can't see the size of his penis (unless his naked)
Other than that I would like to read what woman on escapist think about penis size.
A and D have exceptions when they also look good
AA are just too non-existent (seriously my own chest muscles are bigger than that)
DD looks too impractical
DDD and anything bigger just creeps me out
P.S. On a side note- does women with AA and A size breasts really need bras? Because you don't see guys with well developed chest muscles to be wearing bras.
I think that that discussion would be slightly more complicated than this oneAaron Sylvester said:Now lets start an equivalent thread about male penis size and how big is "too big". I think it would be a vastly more interesting topic
Simply because when you see a woman on a street you can with certain degree say what size her breasts are
When you see a man you can't see the size of his penis (unless his naked)
Other than that I would like to read what woman on escapist think about penis size.
I say it's about proportion. Human sized boobs on a giant would just be silly. No but seriously the limit is when they are perfectly round and/or cause severe back problems, other than that it's all preference. Personally the first two are too big, the third is probably the most I'd allow. But it depends on the person too. Generally speaking, B and C are pretty much the comfort zone.
My boyfriend insists that "more than a handful is a waste". However, I have quite small breasts (between an A and B cup, depending on the bra), so he may just be being nice.
I also have a handy "two-sizes-bigger" bra that I wear with outfits that require more bust (or just when my self-esteem needs a lift). With that bra on, I have more padding than actual breast! The first time I wore it, my boyfriend gave me a hug, then held me at arm's length looking puzzled and said "You feel... spongy."
Still, it's cheaper (and lighter!) than implants.
OK, too much girth to fit comfortably (even when fully relaxed) is probably too big. That said, women's bodies are very elastic (given enough foreplay), so there's a lot of room for maneuver there. Personally, if a guy is too long to allow good full-body contact during missionary, then that's suboptimal. But that can be offset by him being tall...
It's an interesting question. All of the guys I've been with have been about the same size when "active" (they've also all been white, before someone asks) so I can only really speculate.
Women with smaller breasts often wear padded bras to give themselves a little more shape (rather than needing them specifically for support). If I didn't wear padded bras, my bust would only be visible in tight tops.blackrave said:
I also have a handy "two-sizes-bigger" bra that I wear with outfits that require more bust (or just when my self-esteem needs a lift). With that bra on, I have more padding than actual breast! The first time I wore it, my boyfriend gave me a hug, then held me at arm's length looking puzzled and said "You feel... spongy."
Still, it's cheaper (and lighter!) than implants.
There's only so much back muscles can compensate for, especially if the woman has a very slight frame. And big breasts can develop faster than you think. A friend of mine went from flat-chested to DDs in two years. She is very small and slender, with almost no muscle mass.Aaron Sylvester said:
It's not the size that counts - it's how you use it.Aaron Sylvester said:Now lets start an equivalent thread about male penis size and how big is "too big". I think it would be a vastly more interesting topic
OK, too much girth to fit comfortably (even when fully relaxed) is probably too big. That said, women's bodies are very elastic (given enough foreplay), so there's a lot of room for maneuver there. Personally, if a guy is too long to allow good full-body contact during missionary, then that's suboptimal. But that can be offset by him being tall...
It's an interesting question. All of the guys I've been with have been about the same size when "active" (they've also all been white, before someone asks) so I can only really speculate.
Cantaloupe size is good, watermelon size is usually too big. I say usually because Nadine Jansen proves otherwise.
If I had to rank my top 10 (or 20) they would be
Hannah Minx
Gianna Michaels
Tanya Song
Katerina Hartlova
Angela White
Dors Feline
Karina Hart
Christy Marks
Kat Dennings
Christina Hendricks
Honestly as long as they aren't implants they can be the size of balled up socks and people will still kill each other to see them.
I hate implants. They look terrible, they are gross, and they are dangerous. How is it any different than that idiot that had a "doctor" inject fix-a-flat into her already huge ass so that it looked like the lower portion of a cottage cheese snowman?
Because the implants were made in a sterile factory? You keep telling yourself that.
Also maybe about 1 in 800 guys actually like implants, because they have a particular fetish for them, or they feel like they can probably easily manipulate a girl that has such obviously low self esteem as to slice her tits open and put garbage inside them for other's approval.
The overwhelming majority prefer natural, regardless of the size. Ideally you would want someone to be attracted to YOU, or at least the parts you were made with. If you really needed to put crap in your Ts to get fellas to want your A, then good luck with that, I'm sure Mr. Right was just waiting for you to go under that knife.
Also enjoy how much sensitivity you will almost certainly lose, how disgusting they will look in a few decades regardless due to age and the added weight dragging them down faster, and forget breast feeding as its complicated if not impossible in most cases.
And anyone staring at you because of your giant rack, is still going to do a double take as soon as someone with naturally huge boobs come bouncing by. You know that on a subconscious level because they are the ones you are trying and failing at imitating. No matter how huge you make them, the real ones are going to get more attention, so save your money and develop a personality?
If I had to rank my top 10 (or 20) they would be
Hannah Minx
Gianna Michaels
Tanya Song
Katerina Hartlova
Angela White
Dors Feline
Karina Hart
Christy Marks
Kat Dennings
Christina Hendricks
Honestly as long as they aren't implants they can be the size of balled up socks and people will still kill each other to see them.
I hate implants. They look terrible, they are gross, and they are dangerous. How is it any different than that idiot that had a "doctor" inject fix-a-flat into her already huge ass so that it looked like the lower portion of a cottage cheese snowman?
Because the implants were made in a sterile factory? You keep telling yourself that.
Also maybe about 1 in 800 guys actually like implants, because they have a particular fetish for them, or they feel like they can probably easily manipulate a girl that has such obviously low self esteem as to slice her tits open and put garbage inside them for other's approval.
The overwhelming majority prefer natural, regardless of the size. Ideally you would want someone to be attracted to YOU, or at least the parts you were made with. If you really needed to put crap in your Ts to get fellas to want your A, then good luck with that, I'm sure Mr. Right was just waiting for you to go under that knife.
Also enjoy how much sensitivity you will almost certainly lose, how disgusting they will look in a few decades regardless due to age and the added weight dragging them down faster, and forget breast feeding as its complicated if not impossible in most cases.
And anyone staring at you because of your giant rack, is still going to do a double take as soon as someone with naturally huge boobs come bouncing by. You know that on a subconscious level because they are the ones you are trying and failing at imitating. No matter how huge you make them, the real ones are going to get more attention, so save your money and develop a personality?
Well, besides the obvious, I meant for comfort.MetalMagpie said:Women with smaller breasts often wear padded bras to give themselves a little more shape (rather than needing them specifically for support). If I didn't wear padded bras, my bust would only be visible in tight tops.
I also have a handy "two-sizes-bigger" bra that I wear with outfits that require more bust (or just when my self-esteem needs a lift). With that bra on, I have more padding than actual breast! There is more padding in that bra than I actually have breast tissue! The first time I wore it, my boyfriend gave me a hug, then held me at arm's length looking puzzled and said "You feel... spongy."
Still, it's cheaper (and lighter!) than implants.
Like AA and A size sport bras, because they seems a bit useless.
I think that it can be fixed by regular training routine that involves exercises for back.
Don't dismiss such interesting discussion so fast.It's not the size that counts - it's how you use it.
OK, too much girth to fit comfortably (even when fully relaxed) is probably too big. That said, women's bodies are very elastic (given enough foreplay), so there's a lot of room for maneuver there. Personally, if a guy is too long to allow good full-body contact during missionary, then that's suboptimal. But that can be offset by him being tall...
It's an interesting question. All of the guys I've been with have been about the same size when "active" (they've also all been white, before someone asks) so I can only really speculate.
There are plenty of potential discussions there
Just a few examples
Circumcised vs. uncircumcised
Meat penis vs. blood penis
What is too big and what is too small
This has been done enough for one year so no, no, no, no, no, no, no, noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.blackrave said:
See this [http://users.elite.net/runner/jennifers/no.htm]
I hope I made myself perfectly clear on the subject.
That one topic should stay in the basement where it belongs and not spoken of again.
OT: As long as they are natural I don't care.
All the images you posted are way too big. Sure, bigger is nice but they have to look real or you've just gone too far.
Proportion, perkiness, shape...all make a difference, but if they look good on her is the real question. Christina Hendricks, for example, has a great bosom, but her breasts would look ridiculous on say...Emma Watson. It all comes down to the individual.
Tho for the record, anything fake usually looks terrible, and asses are more important anyway.
Tho for the record, anything fake usually looks terrible, and asses are more important anyway.
I have DDs and I could stand to go a bit bigger, but not by much as I already have terrible back pain.
As for other women? I don't mind if they get implants, but getting them to go beyond an E is ridiculous. If they're naturally gigantic then that's fine, but why would you subject yourself to the pain and hassle of implants just to get ridiculously massive boobs that look silly rather than sexy?
As for other women? I don't mind if they get implants, but getting them to go beyond an E is ridiculous. If they're naturally gigantic then that's fine, but why would you subject yourself to the pain and hassle of implants just to get ridiculously massive boobs that look silly rather than sexy?
To the three examples in the OP (respectively): too big, too big, and borderline but acceptable.
This is, of course, mostly subjective... but I imagine the woman pictured second up there has some serious mobility and pain issues (also possibly muscle strain) resultant from her oversized mammaries, the poor thing.
-
As for the other subject...
Grower vs shower tends to lean toward grower among women I've known, because apparently limp and large just feels icky to 'em.
As for size... I've been called far too big and turned down on that account several times, I've been called too small but accepted anyway once, but most often size doesn't warrant comment in my personal experience. And I know that by any technical definition, I fall pretty close to the middle of "average". This is one of those things that seems to have as many answers as there are people giving said answer. Rather like the breast question.
This is, of course, mostly subjective... but I imagine the woman pictured second up there has some serious mobility and pain issues (also possibly muscle strain) resultant from her oversized mammaries, the poor thing.
-
As for the other subject...
With circumcision, I've never heard one way or the other on that front. It seems like a taboo subject to most I've been with... like being harsh with a rape victim over resultant phobias (though obviously not to that degree).blackrave said:
Grower vs shower tends to lean toward grower among women I've known, because apparently limp and large just feels icky to 'em.
As for size... I've been called far too big and turned down on that account several times, I've been called too small but accepted anyway once, but most often size doesn't warrant comment in my personal experience. And I know that by any technical definition, I fall pretty close to the middle of "average". This is one of those things that seems to have as many answers as there are people giving said answer. Rather like the breast question.
From what others have said, I'm led to believe my ideal size is smaller than most. If a woman's breasts exceed the size of her head, that is gonna start getting unattractive. Anywhere from a handful to about the size of a baby's head is good for me (I swear I was sat for about 5 minutes just trying to think of an object of the correct size). For me, it's much more about the ass.
