History has shown otherwise.Avaholic03 said:That's probably the worst of your assumptions.Rhykker said:ASSUMPTION 3: OUR STORAGE NEEDS WILL CONTINUE TO INCREASE OVER TIME.
Sorry, but that's simply not the case. Game size was previously dictated by storage medium, with the move from floppy to cd to dvd to blu ray. PCs have already essentially ditched physical media altogether. Increased storage allows development companies to do things like higher quality audio, larger textures etc, that add nothing to the cost of development (since they are typically developed in high quality and then downscaled as appropriate).Avaholic03 said:FOR GAMES: Cost of game development is pretty directly related to install size of games. We're already reaching a plateau where AAA game development is prohibitively expensive. I doubt we'll be seeing double the install size because that would imply roughly double the development costs, and pretty much no game would be profitable then.
Don't believe me? Try installing Titanfall on a PC (50GB).
Or preorder Evolve (50GB) or worse GTAV (65GB).
Yes, but again, increased storage capacity will allow higher quality files.Avaholic03 said:All other file types just don't take up that much space. Even a massive library of music, pictures or other assorted files will fit on existing storage hardware.
And that's before we even consider new technology. As 3d printing and VR become more mainstream, the average user is more like to start wanting to edit 3d files. There are already scanners that can create 3d models of existing objects; consumer version of those are just a matter of demand.
Every time we have more storage space available, a technology appears to use it.
Well, the question is whether spinning platters can continue to fall in price at the same rate. It's all good to say that in 5 years you can get a 1TB SSD for $100, but if your storage needs are 10TB and you can get a 20TB platter for the same money, an SSD is still a hard sell.fix-the-spade said:No, speed will come down in price. SSDs are already cheap compared to five years ago and all but free compared to a decade ago, in another five years I bet they'll only somewhat more expensive than spinning platter drives.SnowWookie said:It will be interesting to see what happens here. Will speed win out over price?
Once SSDs are the default, price wars will start as the OEMs fight to get those manufacturing contracts. When I can have a couple of 1TB SSDs in my system I'll be happy chappy.
That said, I think you're probably right. We'll see platters run into diminishing returns in terms of how cheap they can get compared to SSDs, and ultimately, the price gap will probably narrow into insignificance.
Storage isn't the same as processing. If you want a faster chip, you need some serious engineering. Want more storage? Just add more storage. It doesn't have the same physical limitations, aside from the size of the device, and storage is much less of an issue in the mobile space these days anyway (cloud)MoltenSilver said:I also disagree with this quick assessment, but in the opposite direction as the above posters; we've already seen with processing power that eventually you hit the physical limitations of miniaturization and have to look to find whole new ways of processing.