How do you lose weight?

Recommended Videos

MeChaNiZ3D

New member
Aug 30, 2011
3,102
0
0
I'm very organised, I always know where my weight is. And as for pounds, here we have Australian dollars. So no problems so far.
 

StBishop

New member
Sep 22, 2009
3,249
0
0
Jarsh82 said:
StBishop said:
Just a quick note, you can feel free to use physiology terms, I'm pretty familiar with exercise physiology.

I think your science might be a little off, but that could be you simplifying things a great deal to make it easier to understand.

I'd like to clarify a couple of points if you don't mind.

1. Are you implying that our body will use fat stores before using glycogen stores?
2. When you say regularly, are you talking about HIIT or are you referring to simply exercising multiple times a week?
3. You're slightly off on the energy felt from exercising, that's almost entirely to do with your endocrine system, not your body being "Kick started" as many bro-scientists would suggest. A cold shower will have the same effect, just to a lesser degree.
4. Do you have any references for your blood triglyceride concentration increasing with regular physical activity. I am pretty sure that high blood triglyceride is an indicator of poor cardiovascular health/cardiovascular disease risk.
5. It's nit-picky, but you completely misused the word bolus.

Jarsh82 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3iUN1-2PHI
Excelent example of a high intensity workout.
We're going to have to disagree there.
1 I wasn't implying that we use our fat stores before glycogen stores. Both FFA and blood sugar is lowered during exercise increasing glycogen and triglyceride catabolism after exercise.
2 I haven't used that term but I suppose that is closer to what I'm talking about.
3 Well it's all endocrine system. I never used the term kick start. FFA levels in the blood increase approximately 40% for 13 to 16 hours after exercise according to astudy by Washington University School of Medicine Devision of Nutitional Science. The study was titled Free fatty acid kinetics in the late phase os post exercise recovery.
4The study of have mentioned is from 2009. There are others that are older so not worth mentioning. I was refering to post exercise not general and constant levels.
5 my use of the word bolus was correcect. Beyond a bolus of food or medication dossage it has a broader meaning of having a high concentration to achieve an immediate effect. This word is commonly used in radiation dossage which is my background so I added it in without much thought.
1. Thanks, just thought I'd check. I wasn't sure if you were implying immediate release of fat stores.
2. HIIT is pretty much high intensity work in short bouts with sufficient active rest to remove lactate and allow longer maximal (or close to maximal) bouts of exercise. You end up maintaining a VO[sub]2[/sub] around the Lactate Threshold. It's a very efficient way to deplete glycogen stores quickly and therefore turn to fat stores for energy.
3. Sorry, I wasn't trying to imply that you had. I was making assumptions based on what I've heard from other people who subscribe to crossfit. The efficacy of exercise for weightloss in the morning compared to the evening has been found to be insignificant. That's all I was trying to say. (Would you happen to have the Author(s) of that paper? I tend to have better luck with searching Authors than searching titles.)
4. Ok, I'm still pretty sure that after exercise the concentration of fat within the blood decreases. I might be mistaken.
5. Again, my bad. I've never heard it used that way, it appears there's different uses for the term bolus in multiple fields. I've only ever encountered it being used in digestion and I was under the assumption that it was to do with the physical appearance of the object, given the root of the word.

Capcha: "high five" indeed.
 

Jarsh82

New member
Sep 17, 2012
172
0
0
@ StBishop:

I can get you the authors if you give me time. Probably not tonight though. It seems like work and I just got done with work. FFA is decreased during exercise. Is that what you're thinking of or perhaps you're thinking of resting FFA? Relating to your post that started this. I didn't intend to argue that diet isn't the most important factor in weight loss just that the physiological value comes during recovery and shouldn't be judged soley on caloric expenditure during the exercise. I also can't imagine someone who is predisposed to obesity have long term success without finding a form of exercise they truly enjoy. That's why I do crossfit because its fun as hell and I love going.
 

uzo

New member
Jul 5, 2011
710
0
0
I'm 175cm; in the high 80kgs (close to 200lbs).

If a doc looks just at my BMI without actually seeing me, they gasp and imagine someone on death's door. They expect a waist well over 100cm, double/triple chins, and barely the energy to get up a flight of stairs.

Then they meet me - I'm not skinny, or even slim, by any stretch of the imagination, but I work in a paradoxical kind of job. I'm administration and IT support at a large freight depot. That means half the day I'm sitting (I have a 20kilo dumbbell under my desk for free moments); and the other half of the day I'm literally *running* around on the dock, manhandling freight, climbing up and down stairs and ladders in the warehouse.

It means that, in my daily work, I cover around 10-15km in an 8hr shift, alot of that either at brisk walk or slow jogging pace, and often carrying 10-20 kilos of extra weight whilst I do it. Hey presto, pretty big muscles on arms and core, strong legs, stocky body, and a resting heart rate of 60. But my waist is not and never will be less than around 85cm.


Hell, my father is 68 and still does triathlons - in one of his last competitions in Cronulla (near Sydney) he beat everyone in every age group down to the 40-45 age group. But, like father like son, he's not all washboard abs and 5% body fat. More like marshmallow abs and 20-25% body fat.

I like to think of myself as having a survivor's body - famine, disease? pah! - and considering I'm a closet nutjob survivalist that's a good thing.

So, although I'm jealous of washboard abs and <10% body fat, I know it's not something I could achieve without *TOTAL* dedication. And frankly, I enjoy beer and carbohydrates too much for that. And I'm not a body image fanatic.
 

Olas

Hello!
Dec 24, 2011
3,226
0
0
Easy, I make horrible decisions, go completely broke, and resort to eating catfood for several months until I can get back on my feet and make some money.
 

Saulkar

Regular Member
Legacy
Aug 25, 2010
3,140
2
13
Country
Canuckistan
I visit the gym 3-4 times a week for 1-3 hours. Nuff said.
 

Product Placement

New member
Jul 16, 2009
475
0
0
Eat responsibly but don't be afraid to indulge yourself from time to time. Find a sport related activity that interests you and stick with it. Finally, remember that there's no such thing as a "quick fix" and a "magic solution" so don't go and buy those diet books or weight loss pills or whatever else that you might be thinking about buying.

It's pretty much as simple as that.
 

Zenn3k

New member
Feb 2, 2009
1,322
0
0
Jarsh82 said:
Like a lot of people in their late twenties, I put on more than a little weight. Over the past year I lost fifty pounds by running and cross fit. What do you do to keep the pounds off?
I've always had a fairly fast metabolism, I went from 5th grade till 26 year old at 115 lbs, doing nothing but playing video games and eating junk food.

Lately I've started to get a bit of a gut. Cut my pepsi intake and started drinking more water...gut is fading.

So I guess, more water?
 

Tumedus

New member
Jul 13, 2010
215
0
0
While diet is important, especially things like avoiding soda and virtually everything you can with high fructose corn syrup, altering it is a poor way to lose wait. Your body is designed to alter its metabolism for changes in diet, thus any dietary changes that aren't part of a complete lifestyle change will not be effective long term, even if it has short term benefits. Also, virtually any diet "system" includes potential dangers to your system as the weight loss from less/different food enacts starvation mechanisms far more than straight fat burning.

Dietary habits, on the other hand, can make a huge difference. Breakfast, for example is huge. Having that meal soon after you wake gets your metabolism running and burning that much longer throughout your day. Eat smaller meals more frequently, even if the total calories stay the same. Having small meals throughout the day helps keep that metabolism running. And having a late snack is far better than having seconds at dinner (just avoid eating too close to bed time).

But, ultimately, its about being active. Even for people that don't like to exercise, or simply can't commit to it, just changing your everday activities to include a little more "work" can make a huge difference. Little things like walking up the stairs rather than taking the elevator. Walking/riding to work or just parking further towards the back. Go to a pub that has standing counters rather than seated tables. Rather than meandering slowly at the grocery store, try to keep a brisk pace. These may seem like small things but they can make a huge difference.


Edit: this isn't trying to say that eating carrots over potato chips isn't an improvement or that you won't get serious benefit from swimming for hours a day, only that most people aren't able to maintain things like that. Its far better long term, to succeed with small changes than to fail with the big ones.
 

MegaManOfNumbers

New member
Mar 3, 2010
1,325
0
0
I forget to eat.

No, seriously. I stopped martial arts a year ago to focus on University (which BTW is absolute BULLSHIT). I get my exercise from walking long distances all over the unnecessarily large campus and outright forgetting to eat. I still eat; just not as much as I used to.

I'm unhealthy, Asian, a hermit, anti-social and a gamer! Stereotypes AHOY!
 

StBishop

New member
Sep 22, 2009
3,249
0
0
uzo said:
I'm 175cm; in the high 80kgs (close to 200lbs).

If a doc looks just at my BMI without actually seeing me, they gasp and imagine someone on death's door. They expect a waist well over 100cm, double/triple chins, and barely the energy to get up a flight of stairs.

Then they meet me - I'm not skinny, or even slim, by any stretch of the imagination, but I work in a paradoxical kind of job. I'm administration and IT support at a large freight depot. That means half the day I'm sitting (I have a 20kilo dumbbell under my desk for free moments); and the other half of the day I'm literally *running* around on the dock, manhandling freight, climbing up and down stairs and ladders in the warehouse.

It means that, in my daily work, I cover around 10-15km in an 8hr shift, alot of that either at brisk walk or slow jogging pace, and often carrying 10-20 kilos of extra weight whilst I do it. Hey presto, pretty big muscles on arms and core, strong legs, stocky body, and a resting heart rate of 60. But my waist is not and never will be less than around 85cm.


Hell, my father is 68 and still does triathlons - in one of his last competitions in Cronulla (near Sydney) he beat everyone in every age group down to the 40-45 age group. But, like father like son, he's not all washboard abs and 5% body fat. More like marshmallow abs and 20-25% body fat.

I like to think of myself as having a survivor's body - famine, disease? pah! - and considering I'm a closet nutjob survivalist that's a good thing.

So, although I'm jealous of washboard abs and <10% body fat, I know it's not something I could achieve without *TOTAL* dedication. And frankly, I enjoy beer and carbohydrates too much for that. And I'm not a body image fanatic.
Bearmode achieved.

Jarsh82 said:
@ StBishop:

I can get you the authors if you give me time. Probably not tonight though. It seems like work and I just got done with work. FFA is decreased during exercise. Is that what you're thinking of or perhaps you're thinking of resting FFA? Relating to your post that started this. I didn't intend to argue that diet isn't the most important factor in weight loss just that the physiological value comes during recovery and shouldn't be judged soley on caloric expenditure during the exercise. I also can't imagine someone who is predisposed to obesity have long term success without finding a form of exercise they truly enjoy. That's why I do crossfit because its fun as hell and I love going.
Thanks I appreciate it.
 

5ilver

New member
Aug 25, 2010
340
0
0
I wish it was as simple as just running or doing any physical activity for me. I went through 7 months at the gym, 2 months of boxing, a bit of yoga, countless months of dieting and jogging (approx 3.5 years total) and still haven't really achieved anything.

Guess someone up there really hates me for whatever reason :/
 

Clive Howlitzer

New member
Jan 27, 2011
2,781
0
0
I've never had a problem keeping weight off, even as I am in my late 20s now. The problem is not gaining weight but keeping weight on. I am naturally thin and I eat healthy, so if I don't stay on top of exercising, weight training, and/or playing some kind of sport with friends. I will lose a lot of weight(mostly muscle) very fast.
In fact, I haven't been hitting my regular gym schedule lately and I lost about 20lbs in the past 6 months because of it. I really have to get back on it.
 

White_Lama

New member
Feb 23, 2011
547
0
0
Boudica said:
White_Lama said:
Nothing at all :)

Been the same weight now for about 6-7 years, good metabolism, I eat mostly junkfood aswell :)
If you eat "mostly junk food," odds are you're very unhealthy.

*snippy bit*
Never said I was healthy, I'll be the first to admit I'm unhealthy.
But, I won't live forever, might aswell enjoy it while I'm still here :)
 

Alcoholidayer

New member
Sep 16, 2012
31
0
0
MegaManOfNumbers said:
I forget to eat.

No, seriously. I stopped martial arts a year ago to focus on University (which BTW is absolute BULLSHIT). I get my exercise from walking long distances all over the unnecessarily large campus and outright forgetting to eat. I still eat; just not as much as I used to.

I'm unhealthy, Asian, a hermit, anti-social and a gamer! Stereotypes AHOY!
Wow. Replace martial arts with sports and Asian with Indian(who are technically Asian I guess) and you have me.

OT : Not doing anything about it works for me just fine. It's gaining weight that's the problem. I'm skinnier than many of my lady friends, it's embarrassing.
 

White_Lama

New member
Feb 23, 2011
547
0
0
Boudica said:
White_Lama said:
Boudica said:
White_Lama said:
Nothing at all :)

Been the same weight now for about 6-7 years, good metabolism, I eat mostly junkfood aswell :)
If you eat "mostly junk food," odds are you're very unhealthy.

*snippy bit*
Never said I was healthy, I'll be the first to admit I'm unhealthy.
But, I won't live forever, might aswell enjoy it while I'm still here :)
Whatever works best for you, right? I'm the same. I'm vegan and quite unhealthy lol. I eat tons of vegetables and fruits, but I also eat snacks. Constantly >_> Quite thin, too.
Pretty much. I'm a fruitoholic, I can eat like 10 apples a day without even thinking about it, making my grocery shopping a bit painful when I have to carry pretty much a garbage bag full of apple to last me a week.
Granted I do alot of biking, but hardly enough to counter my snack-/junkfood eating.



Captcha (or whatever it is): Meat and drink, quite fitting. Except the drink part.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
Tumedus said:
While diet is important, especially things like avoiding soda and virtually everything you can with high fructose corn syrup, altering it is a poor way to lose wait.
No, dietary changes are pretty much the most effective way to lose weight. Fat storage and loss isn't a simple matter of calories in minus calories out and different foods affect the body in different ways. Avoiding sugars and grains is the most effective way because spikes in blood sugar drive fat storage. Stop spiking it and you stop storing fat like it's going out of style and can start burning it. But the main thing to remember is that if you don't make at the very least these changes to avoid most of the foods which spike blood sugar and you're someone who gains weight very easily and has a hard time losing it, you could exercise until you pass out everyday and you probably won't lose much weight, if any.

Your body is designed to alter its metabolism for changes in diet, thus any dietary changes that aren't part of a complete lifestyle change will not be effective long term, even if it has short term benefits.
True your metabolism changes in response to different foods, but even simple changes like reducing sugar intake are not only effective, but effective long term. Your body isn't going to magically slow it's metabolism if you are eating sufficient amounts of the right foods.

Also, virtually any diet "system" includes potential dangers to your system as the weight loss from less/different food enacts starvation mechanisms far more than straight fat burning.
Nobody should be eating with the aim to reduce calories. They should be eating better types of food until they're full, not eating less. That way they see weight loss, and don't send their body into starvation mode. Simply eating less is the worst way to try and lose weight.

Eat smaller meals more frequently, even if the total calories stay the same. Having small meals throughout the day helps keep that metabolism running.
This is completely unnecessary. If you improve the composition of what you eat then you will far more sated after each meal. There are days where I have a reasonably sized breakfast at around 6:30am, then don't eat lunch until 1:30-2:00 because that's when my body starts telling me that I'm hungry. People need to listen to their bodies, eat until they're sated, and eat again when they're hungry. But if you haven't tackled the composition of your diet first, then the blood sugar spikes are going to send you a lot of mixed messages and result in you being hungry sooner than you should be (like 2-3 hours after you eat, almost regardless of quantity). If you've already tackled the composition of your diet and still find you're hungry 3 hours after your last meal, then you probably just don't eat a lot with each meal and you can feel free to roll with it. Most people who are eating the right foods though just won't get hungry that soon and eating many smaller meals is just useless advice for them.

And no, your metabolism isn't going to slow down just by not eating for a few extra hours.

But, ultimately, its about being active. Even for people that don't like to exercise, or simply can't commit to it, just changing your everday activities to include a little more "work" can make a huge difference. Little things like walking up the stairs rather than taking the elevator. Walking/riding to work or just parking further towards the back. Go to a pub that has standing counters rather than seated tables. Rather than meandering slowly at the grocery store, try to keep a brisk pace. These may seem like small things but they can make a huge difference.
Actually, for most people who feel the need to try and lose weight, it's not just about being active. Like I said before, diet plays the biggest role and if you don't get that together, exercise isn't going to do much for most people because your body spends most of the day in fat storage mode.

And changing little things like you mentioned in combination with diet may help some people a bit, but higher intensity exercise is vastly more effective at dealing with years of built up insulin resistance.


Edit: this isn't trying to say that eating carrots over potato chips isn't an improvement or that you won't get serious benefit from swimming for hours a day, only that most people aren't able to maintain things like that.
I fully agree with you on this. How committed someone is definitely plays a role, but I'd rather see people do the thing that will work to keep that motivation going, rather than do little things that don't really do much and have them feel like it isn't happening fast enough or that they're failing so they can keep that motivation going. Even if they have to gradually ease into it, like cutting out drinking pop, or giving up chips, or starting to swim 3 days a week, and continue to ramp up to other changes gradually as the weight comes off then that's fine. But if someone expects to just give up pop and take the stairs at work and lose a hundred pounds, they might get a little discouraged when it doesn't happen. Small changes should always be steps on the path leading to a larger lifestyle change.

And of course, the reality is some people just aren't as serious and committed as they think they are, or want to be and will fail because of that. It's unfortunate, but there's not much you can do about that.
 

Korolev

No Time Like the Present
Jul 4, 2008
1,852
0
0
Whatever you do to lose weight - you now have to do that (or something equivalent) forever.

People often "go on a diet" to lose weight. You don't "go on" a diet - everyone is on a diet all the time. It's just that there are bad diets and good diets. Bad diets make you fat, good diets make you less fat. If you want to lose weight forever, you have to change your diet. Permanently. There is no way around this, unless you want gastric-bypass surgery or lap-band surgery - which is expensive and has risks and side-effects.

The key to losing weight is to watch what you eat. A lot of overweight people protest that they do not overeat, claiming that they just eat what everyone around them eats. Studies show that they are either lying or are grossly misinformed about what "everyone around them eats". You can search this up on PubMed, but studies show that overweight people chronically under-report or underestimate how much they eat - by a LOT. If you are overweight, sorry, but chances are you got that way by either overeating, eating the wrong food, or just being immobile for long periods of time. That's just medical fact.

Of course there are a few people who suffer from very unusual and RARE conditions that make the body overweight - microscopic tumors that can secrete appetite-stimulators and so forth - but again, these problems ARE RARE. VERY RARE. The amount of overweight people who claim to suffer from these conditions far, far, far, far, far exceeds the prevalence rate.

Cut Junk Food, get a lot of sugar out of your diet, cut down on fats, watch what the labels say on the packages and exercise more. That's all you need to do to lose weight.

It is also one of THE HARDEST THINGS TO DO, EVER. I'm not going to lie - it is INCREDIBLY difficult to lose weight and keep it off through dietary changes alone. Once you are obese, your brain thinks that's the weight you should be at - any attempt to lose weight will trigger your brain to think you are literally starving. And it's not just the amount of food - it's what you eat as well - if you've been taking a lot of sugar for decades, the moment you stop your brain is going to act like something seriously wrong has happened and will THROW A FIT. It will use every trick in the book to make you eat sugar again. When you are losing weight, your brain will literally make you think you're dying. You're not, of course, but your brain wants you to think you are. Unfortunately, we evolved on the Savannah plains, in an environment of scarcity. Food supplies were never secure. Our brains evolved to make us retain weight as much as possible, because we didn't evolve in an environment were food was common. To our primitive areas of our brain, losing weight is the equivalent of suicide.

All this means that once you're fat, you are very, very, very unlikely to go back. Do you know what the success rate is for losing weight through life-style medication and keeping it off is? It's about 3~4% or even less than that. The vast, vast, vast majority of people who try to lose weight through dieting alone don't make it. Those that do are unusually strong willed people, probably far more strong-willed than I or you.

Many doctors are despairing at the failure to address the obesity epidemic through diet and exercise. Unfortunately, this generation of obese people are done for. The vast majority of them will never, ever lose their weight, unless they get surgery, and it's just not feasible to provide millions upon millions of people with this surgery. Our efforts are focused on preventing the obesity problem from growing and saving the next generation.

But yes - more exercise, less fat and sugary foods. The sugar is the problem, because sugar turns into fat very easily. Carbohydrates also get turned into fat quite easily. Watch what you eat, how much you eat and if you have a VERY strong will (stronger than mine, even though I'm not overweight and never have been, I admit that if you can lose weight permanently you probably have a stronger will than I do), then you can lose weight forever.

Or get surgery. Which I don't recommend unless you are very obese.
 

SquirePB

New member
Apr 5, 2011
76
0
0
I personally don't count calories but rather I count my macro nutrients (protein, carbs, fat) to maintain a low body fat percentage (currently on 9% but looking to get down to 6%). I mostly just do weightlifting. My current program says that I have to do cardio 3 days a week but I'm pretty slack with that to be honest.