I often find the biggest problem with most conspiracies is the level of imagination of the theorist is often far in excess of the alleged conspirator. Government conspiracies are the worst. Take the US Government, who can't even hide petty scandals, can't come up with creative ways (which the private sector repeatedly does) to solve it's biggest looming issues, and with politicians so buried under their own personal agendas to worry about mom and pop's telephone conversation, to believe these same people are capable of masterminding this James Bond villain level of master surveillance is just ludicrous.
The other issue is simply one of people not understanding the logistics of their theories. Surveillance conspiracies are always bad about this, people assuming that we are fully capable of doing Enemy of the State level of monitoring don't understand the logistical issues of that task. Yes we have all this amazing technology, tiny surveillance cameras, bugs, satellites, phone tapping, impressive software with amazing sorting algorithms but technology on the scale of what people theorize their conspiracies about is far more than a sum of it's parts. You would need an unprecedented amount of actual manpower just to filter through this alleged data just to find anything of relevance, it's more than a simple word search for "hotlisted terms". You cannot financially justify the amount of funding it would require to have such a massive surveillance operation, the manpower needed is too great, the amount of sheer processing power on behalf of the technology is too great (without an unrestricted budget), it's just ridiculous to assume our government would resort to such a silly act for a few extra pings on their GitMo Occupancy List.
Of course there's everything from cryptozoological conspiracies, alien conspiracies, government conspiracies, disaster conspiracies, even geek culture theories on intent behind movies, games, and tv show creators.
They are fun to look at it, but I implore everyone to actually try and better understand the conspiracies they read before believing them out of turn because one person seems to make an arguable case, get your own facts.
The other issue is simply one of people not understanding the logistics of their theories. Surveillance conspiracies are always bad about this, people assuming that we are fully capable of doing Enemy of the State level of monitoring don't understand the logistical issues of that task. Yes we have all this amazing technology, tiny surveillance cameras, bugs, satellites, phone tapping, impressive software with amazing sorting algorithms but technology on the scale of what people theorize their conspiracies about is far more than a sum of it's parts. You would need an unprecedented amount of actual manpower just to filter through this alleged data just to find anything of relevance, it's more than a simple word search for "hotlisted terms". You cannot financially justify the amount of funding it would require to have such a massive surveillance operation, the manpower needed is too great, the amount of sheer processing power on behalf of the technology is too great (without an unrestricted budget), it's just ridiculous to assume our government would resort to such a silly act for a few extra pings on their GitMo Occupancy List.
Of course there's everything from cryptozoological conspiracies, alien conspiracies, government conspiracies, disaster conspiracies, even geek culture theories on intent behind movies, games, and tv show creators.
They are fun to look at it, but I implore everyone to actually try and better understand the conspiracies they read before believing them out of turn because one person seems to make an arguable case, get your own facts.