I don't know who the war will be between, but for the love of god I hope that Britain stays neutral in it. As far as I can see that will be the only way to stand a chance of surviving the war.
How do you think World War III will pan out?
- Thread starter Nouw
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I'm not American, but it usually is all the "brown" countries that do cause shit. Name a single shity little backwater country that lives peacefully with its neighbours and doesnt oppress its people. I'm glad that America has taken our position as the worlds policeman and dishes out soem form of justice. Yes I know it seems that they only go into the oil rich countries but they cant be everywhere. Where are the French and Germans? So long as mainland Europe continues to look after itself it will crumble from the inside.AxCx said:
America also gives out a hell of a lot of aid and other humanitarian stuff that all these crappy little countries are all too happy to grab with one hand and try and murder them with the other.
On topic I wouldnt mind the former British Empire getting back together for old times sake and kicking ass (with US, India, Canada, Australia and NZ etc all banding together).
I don't know if anyone knows but after WW1 there were some very serious discussions to form a world goverment led by USA and British Empire to literally rule the world.
the making of the first lightsaber.... boom.. World war III with lightsabers because they have to test it somehow..
there will never be another world war. Period. That's not to say there won't be large scale conventional conflicts, just nothing on the scales we've seen. There are far more effective ways of fighting, like guerilla warfare.
Ninja'd, damn.SimuLord said:
OT: Well if WW3 were to break out soon, I think it will be sparked off by North Korea and their nuclear weapons. It's already tense enough, once they start building more and more America might begin to worry more, more pressure may be pu on North Korea to cease production. This in itself would not be enough to start a war, in fact it might just become a 2nd Cold War.
If the same sort of events that occured in the Cold War repeat once again, some countries may take covert steps to destabilise the dictatorship by plotting other, smaller, countries or rebellious movements against them as America did with the Taliban (I'm assuming the basic ideas from Charlie Wilson's War did actually happen). I don't know all that much about North Korea, but they do seem to be more antagoniostic and quicker to react to insult and outside involvement. If any covert operations were discovered they may retaliate, probably with nuclear weapons therefore sparking off a short but incredibly brutal war, in which a large number of nuclear weapons will be used against each side, targeting critical operations and large population centers.
Countries without nuclear weapons will be largely untouched and most of those countries may even remain uninvolved. The war will not take more than a month, but will have the highest number of casualties, both civilian and miltary, than any past disaster or war. It could happen as early as 2015, and I think a nuclear war is inevitable and will likely occur before the turn of the century.
That's my two cents worth. And yes I do believe nuclear war is inevitable. Whether or not it is North Korea or anyone else who triggers it I can only guess, but it will happen.
All I can say is, if someone launches a nuke at us, then we shove every one of our nukes up their asses. Then we run out of nukes and another country shoves their nukes up our ass, rinse and repeat until all the no nuke countries are alive. Then they get mutated from the now permanemt fallout over the planet. The end
Oh, and cockroaches will take over and become overlords
Oh, and cockroaches will take over and become overlords
This!henritje said:
Only chances are I'll be sitting on a Deck-chair in the front of my house waiting for the bomb, but still singing the wonderful tunes of The Ink Spots.
personally i believe world war III is already happening and has been for the last 20 years, in between the civil fighting in various parts of africa, what's going on in the middle east and mediterrainian, every now and then there's a flare up between russia and a former soviet state, then add to that the fact that north and south korea are technically still at war, and south east asia is still picking up the pieces from the cold war and they occasionaly break out in civil war/violence. don't forget the war on drugs either
the only places not involved in fighting are europe (i think...) and the islands out in the pacific.
the only places not involved in fighting are europe (i think...) and the islands out in the pacific.
Danik93 said:
Agree, so whip out your horned helmet and battle axe! all will fall to the combined viking rage of scandinavia!
I was only playing devils advocate, but in continuing with that, North Korea, China, and by proxy the terrorist groups with a grudge against the USA.Dr. Whiggs said:
My reasoning being that China being communist would back NK in a war against South Korea. The US would help again, as they did last time, Chinese troops would be in conflict with American troops and this would lead to all the members of NATO being a war with China and NK, being at a disadvantage, China would do what the US did to the USSR when they were in the middle east, supply and fund the terrorists in power.
Again this is just playing devils advocate and in all likely hood China would sooner trade with the USA for profit than fight them in Korea. But the slight possibility (from an alliance stand point) is there.