Same here (Canada) I think it is mostly a states and thirds world thingPinkamena said:I have no idea. I can't remember the last time sexuality was even mentioned in a regular conversation. It's just not a big deal here (Norway).
Same here (Canada) I think it is mostly a states and thirds world thingPinkamena said:I have no idea. I can't remember the last time sexuality was even mentioned in a regular conversation. It's just not a big deal here (Norway).
This.manic_depressive13 said:Loads of people are still homophobic. How many people support gay marriage, but think it's 'murky territory' when it comes to homosexuals adopting children?
I'll tell you: Lots.
How it has changed in centuries past is not my concern. Its definition within my life time is my only concern. And that definition is a union of a man and a woman which has legal benefits/responsibilities and strong religious overtones.Friv said:I'm curious here, and I want to sound neutral because I really do want to know. Given how many times and in how many ways the definition of marriage has changed over the years, what is it about this particular change that concerns you?
Nope. The word tranny may be offensive to some people but is is most certainly not a pejorative in itself. It is simply a contraction of Transsexual/Trangender/Tran-whatever-fucking-title-they-want-to-be-known-as-this-week as I am not learning a whole assload of terms for a bunch of people who can not even decide themselves what is the correct word this week. And they always get so goddamn pissy if you use the wrong one.I'm going to say this delicately, because I don't want you to think that I'm attacking you, but do you know that the actual word "tranny" is itself a pejorative word? It's not a word that you should be using in a discussion on how you aren't bigoted, because by god are people going to jump on you.
Missouri for one, Kansas for another. Basically anywhere there that is called the bible belt as far as the US goes. I am a homosexual who hides it, because I'd lose my job, my family, my friends if they found out. Its extremely un-friendly towards homosexuals here.IamQ said:Maybe this is just the case for me, but now-a-days whenever I see someone saying that they are a "proud homosexual/bisexual whatevs'" I always think "so? Is that still the rage these days?". I have rarely, if ever, seen any homophobic activity where I live, so I'm always confused as to why there still are so many that feel so proud in announcing their sexuality. I'm 17, and I think that about 50% of all the girls I've met are bisexual.
But once again, this may just be me. How is it where you people live?
The first thing you say is obviously hyperbole, so I'll ignore that. As for your gay marriage thing, why do you think it's a problem for two people who love each other to show the public that they commit to each other, and have it be recognized by the government? And why should it be called something else just because the participants are slightly different?Monkeyman O said:The real problem, online at least, is that unless you pretty much are willing to personally suck off at least 100 gay men then you are considered a homophobe.
Look at all the half wits to resort to calling people a homophobe if they disagree with gay marriage. I personally am against gay marriage. Does not mean I hate or fear gay people. I am not religious either. I simply disagree with them wanting to change the definition of marriage.
Why are you apprehensive, if I may ask? As far as I can tell, most people in the not-straight community are pretty much the same as those in the straight community, just that they like to have sex with different things.Evil Smurf said:I am apprehensive when it comes to gay people, I just don't know what to do. However, I don't hate them, nor do I hate anyone
Hear hear!Easton Dark said:Enough to make a difference.
Lets work on changing their minds, ey?
youre allowed to speak out your belifs..Trunipbob said:Isnip.
I think your solution of "turn marriage into a religious thing, make 'gay marriage' legal but have the governmentally acknowledged term for marriages -straight or gay- be 'civil union'" is a good and decent one. However, I'm confused as to why you only concern yourself with the definition of marriage that it is now. As has been said, what marriage is has changed a whole lot over the years, especially within living memory. To restrict oneself to the strict interpretation of what you see in front of you seems to be looking at it the wrong way.Monkeyman O said:How it has changed in centuries past is not my concern. Its definition within my life time is my only concern. And that definition is a union of a man and a woman which has legal benefits/responsibilities and strong religious overtones.Friv said:I'm curious here, and I want to sound neutral because I really do want to know. Given how many times and in how many ways the definition of marriage has changed over the years, what is it about this particular change that concerns you?
Also, I looked the word up on google and the first page was Wikipedia.[footnote]The next... many were porn sites, so yeah.Monkeyman O said:The word tranny may be offensive to some people but is is most certainly not a pejorative in itself.
I understand that there is a lot of confusing lingo and so forth, but transgender is an umbrella term that isn't an insult. It's not about having to be PC (that would be needing to be absolutely correct on specifically what minor variation you're talking about), it's about being not insulting or rude. If you aren't meaning to be insulting, it takes the same effort to type "transgender" as opposed to "tranny". If you are meaning to be insulting, then trying to hide behind "but I'm just trying to be all edgy and not PC" insults the intelligence of both of us.Wikipedia said:Tranny (or Trannies) may refer to:
Transformer, an electrical device
Transgender person (considered pejorative)
Transistor radio, a small portable radio receiver using transistor-based circuitry
Transmission (mechanics), a component of a motor vehicle
Transvestite, a person who cross-dresses (considered pejorative)
Ford Transit (slang), a range of Ford panel vans, minibuses, and pickup trucks
Middlesbrough Transporter Bridge, bridge across the River Tees, England
Photographic transparency, made using reversal film
"Transylvania" short form for McFly song "Transylvania"
Just wondering here, do you hate the thought of homosexuality or the hipster elements that have unfortunately became a part of LGBT communities?Jimmybobjr said:In Perth, Australia, i find people around my age - 17 - say they are homosexual (Or more commonly, Bisexual) as it is fashionable. Its like that Kony thing; People say that they are "X" to be with the "in" crowd.
I have met two homos in my life so far; Both gay, both in a relationship.
In the hundreds of people ive met, only two were gay. Most were people saying "IM BI COZ ITS FINE" or something.
It is from this that stems my Homo"Phobia"
On a related note, i hate that word. "Homophobia"..
I was under the impression that "Phobia" meant "Morbid Fear" Or "Irrational Fear".
I dont fear homosexuality. I just hate it.
Or am i reading that wrong?
Ok, being from the NW US I just want to come out in defense of the 'middle' states and the South which seem to be getting a lot of hate here. There are a lot of homophobes in Washington, Oregon, California as well as New York and Maine. The populations might be a little more quite, a little less aggressive but they're here. And there are a lot of good, decent people in the South and Midwest US.thisbymaster said:Most of the world, majority of China, India, Africa, South America, The Southern states of the USA, etc etc. The people who support gays are in the minority.
A lot of teenagers aren't yet sure what they are. It's just now that they know bisexuality (or asexuality)is a thing, that they suppose they should call themselves that because they kinda like both sexes and haven't figured out yet what they are, and what sexual feelings are like.hulksmashley said:Somehow I doubt that 50% of the girls you know are bisexual. Maybe 50% of the girls you know are saying they're bisexual because it's considered hot or whatever but I doubt 50% really are. Just saying.
Let me you in a little secret a bi girl is nothing new. (and they could very well be faking just to look cool) Two girls making out has been accepted for decades. Lesbians are "hot". Its 2 guys making out that piss people off.IamQ said:Maybe this is just the case for me, but now-a-days whenever I see someone saying that they are a "proud homosexual/bisexual whatevs'" I always think "so? Is that still the rage these days?". I have rarely, if ever, seen any homophobic activity where I live, so I'm always confused as to why there still are so many that feel so proud in announcing their sexuality. I'm 17, and I think that about 50% of all the girls I've met are bisexual.
But once again, this may just be me. How is it where you people live?
A while ago I was discussion these issues with a transexual and used the word 'tranny' to refer to them. She politely informed me it's considered offensive, and I told her I didn't know and it was not my intention to be offensive. No-one getting pissy.Monkeyman O said:Nope. The word tranny may be offensive to some people but is is most certainly not a pejorative in itself. It is simply a contraction of Transsexual/Trangender/Tran-whatever-fucking-title-they-want-to-be-known-as-this-week as I am not learning a whole assload of terms for a bunch of people who can not even decide themselves what is the correct word this week. And they always get so goddamn pissy if you use the wrong one.
True.'******' in itself is just a word. But it's generally considered to be offensive, and so people who want to be offensive use it, while other use some other word. If you are aware that the people you are talking to will view the word as offensive, it is your attempt to be offensive.Monkeyman O said:Fortunately for me the escapist head mod agrees with me as I got a warning over turned because he agreed with my definition.
Some people may view the word Jap as offensive but to most it is simply a contraction of Japanese. Same with Yank, auzzie, brit, etc. All these words by themselves are fine. They would only be offensive if used offensively.
You seem to be mistaken about the nature of the debate.Monkeyman O said:How it has changed in centuries past is not my concern. Its definition within my life time is my only concern. And that definition is a union of a man and a woman which has legal benefits/responsibilities and strong religious overtones.
I have no problem at all with homosexual/lesbian couples getting all the legal rights and responsibilities to it under a different heading. Of course, my ultimate solution[footnote]Which will never happen because it would require both sides to get their heads outta their asses and compromise. Which lets be honest, both sides are too fucking stupid to do.[/footnote] would be for a countries president/prime minister/ruling warlord to go the whole separation of church and state way, thus declaring that they, as a representative of the government, have no right to judge on religious matters. So the title of Marriage becomes a issue of the church. So therefore, under the law, all marriage type unions carry the same name regardless of the sex of both parties. So legally speaking its civil unions all round. Leave the "marriage" issue to the church.
And I would be happy with that compromise simply because it would stop all the whining and wasting of tax payer money on something that is totally unimportant.
To be fair, i view them as one and the same; Hipsters are gay, and gay are hipsters. I view them like this because they are one and the same (Synonymous?) at least, in my area. What i really mean is i hate it when they all get up and go around screaming "GEY LOVE IS K, ARIGHT?!" In... everywhere. Im sick of people standing up and yelling about human rights whenever someone is accused of being gay, or whenever someone posts a link to a new article of someone being bullied in America or whatever. I have three on my wall right now. And i have 17 friends. These are not nice things; But i dont need to keep seeing it..JochemHippie said:Just wondering here, do you hate the thought of homosexuality or the hipster elements that have unfortunately became a part of LGBT communities?Jimmybobjr said:In Perth, Australia, i find people around my age - 17 - say they are homosexual (Or more commonly, Bisexual) as it is fashionable. Its like that Kony thing; People say that they are "X" to be with the "in" crowd.
I have met two homos in my life so far; Both gay, both in a relationship.
In the hundreds of people ive met, only two were gay. Most were people saying "IM BI COZ ITS FINE" or something.
It is from this that stems my Homo"Phobia"
On a related note, i hate that word. "Homophobia"..
I was under the impression that "Phobia" meant "Morbid Fear" Or "Irrational Fear".
I dont fear homosexuality. I just hate it.
Or am i reading that wrong?