Yeah, I like Bob and all, but I probably would have preferred him making this on another venue considering his own bias can get really grating sometime, this article seems like a pretty good example.bificommander said:*Starts the article*
Huh, is this new Gamergate-proofing, adding the "this is an opinion"-disclaimer in front of an article? Why is it mentioned so explicitly?
*Halfway through the first page*
Oh, that's why.
Pssh...but you have drugs decriminalized there, how could you possibly be better off than us in terms of drug related crimes and addiction? [/sarcasm]Not American here, so I have mostly second-hand accounts of Fox News and the Colbert Report. I think the only O Reilly clip I saw was when he and his guests were trying to paint my hometown, Amsterdam, as an anarchic distopia thanks to our lax soft-drugs laws, and locals made a clip of smiling families traveling through Amsterdam, while overlaying statistics showing that our rate of drug crimes and drug addiction is considerably lower than in American cities.
Indeed, and the mean-spirited pile-on that Suey Park received in the wake of it didn't help either. Just goes to show that the left also has its share of disrespectful jerks, contrary to what many lefties like to believe. On that note, I found Bob's attitude towards it tellingly callous.Pseudonym2 said:The cancel Colbert women got the joke. She just thought that alternating between white racists and whites making racist jokes ironically left out what actual Asians and minorities thought of the whole thing.
Colbert has a big tell during interviews. You know he actually agrees with someone when he lets them fully answer questions. There's the people that he invites onto the show for shared publicity stunts, and then there's the people he invites out of great respect. Those two types of interviews have a light-and-day difference.vid87 said:As much as I legitimately love and respect Colbert and believe him to be a tremendous actor, I often find his show a little frustrating, not just because he sometimes repeats a story already presented on Daily Show, but his interviews focus more on the routine of the Fox commentators being terrible to their guests and less on the actual info I want to know. Colbert knew how to mock, but Stewart knows when mocking isn't enough.
Conservative poster here and Bob is pretty much spot on. I had thought I might have to get up-in-arms but Bob did well to distance Faux-news from any actual link to conservative political philosophy/theory. Fox is just what Bob says it is, a mouthpiece for those who like to pander to the "conservative base" but who aren't actually conservative. This pandering is only effective because the base themselves aren't any more conservative than their favorite news shows. Actual conservative idealism in my country is all but dead. I consider myself a progressive conservative, which to many seems an impossible contradiction because they have been taught that conservatism is all about being a bigot. We really just have two kinds of liberals here now, progressive liberals and religious liberals.bificommander said:*Starts the article*
Huh, is this new Gamergate-proofing, adding the "this is an opinion"-disclaimer in front of an article? Why is it mentioned so explicitly?
*Halfway through the first page*
Oh, that's why.
Not American here, so I have mostly second-hand accounts of Fox News and the Colbert Report. I think the only O Reilly clip I saw was when he and his guests were trying to paint my hometown, Amsterdam, as an anarchic distopia thanks to our lax soft-drugs laws, and locals made a clip of smiling families traveling through Amsterdam, while overlaying statistics showing that our rate of drug crimes and drug addiction is considerably lower than in American cities.
But I'll leave the discussion to those that have seen either of these shows. Wonder if we'll get fireworks from the conservative posters
I really don't think Park got the joke, at first. It may have been explained to her later, but it seemed pretty obvious from her initial outrage and postings on the issue that she thought it was serious. Then she did what happens all the time when people don't get satire- they try to walk it back and still defend their original complaint under different parameters, and it hardly ever ends up well.Pseudonym2 said:2 The cancel Colbert women got the joke. She just thought that alternating between white racists and whites making racist jokes ironically left out what actual Asians and minorities thought of the whole thing. Not coincidently the senior black correspondent gets Colbert's show so we can have different perspectives handing out different points of view.
Morbidly curious now... what is your ideal of conservatism? I'm assuming we aren't talking 'tea party' philosophy here, since Fox was quite happy to hold them up as paragons...Gorrath said:We really just have two kinds of liberals here now, progressive liberals and religious liberals.
I'm with you on this one. The way her complaints morphed as she went along made it seem pretty obvious that she had jumped too soon without realizing what she was raging against. When it turned out she was jousting at windmills, rather than admit she made a mistake, she began trying to contextualize her complaint in a different way to make it somehow seem legitimate. Throughout the process, she just kept digging herself into a deeper hole. Unfortunate, really.hentropy said:I really don't think Park got the joke, at first. It may have been explained to her later, but it seemed pretty obvious from her initial outrage and postings on the issue that she thought it was serious. Then she did what happens all the time when people don't get satire- they try to walk it back and still defend their original complaint under different parameters, and it hardly ever ends up well.Pseudonym2 said:2 The cancel Colbert women got the joke. She just thought that alternating between white racists and whites making racist jokes ironically left out what actual Asians and minorities thought of the whole thing. Not coincidently the senior black correspondent gets Colbert's show so we can have different perspectives handing out different points of view.
Conservatism in the United States is strongly associated with the small-government movement. This is still endorsed by the politicians and the base but only in talking points. The tea-party started out as a reaction to this problem but became waylaid by the very same disease infecting the rest of the "right" in the U.S.JarinArenos said:Morbidly curious now... what is your ideal of conservatism? I'm assuming we aren't talking 'tea party' philosophy here, since Fox was quite happy to hold them up as paragons...Gorrath said:We really just have two kinds of liberals here now, progressive liberals and religious liberals.