Athinira said:
feycreature said:
I as a person would like someone else to take on the task of initiating contact more often. Hell, I'd like it if more girls did the same, though I think they mostly assume I'm straight so I get the extra hesitation. If I can do it, why can't someone else? You know what's even better for confidence and self-esteem than never being rejected? Realizing that rejection doesn't make you a worse prospect, or less attractive, or less worthy of love. I've gotten a lot of no's...nos? Bah, no good plural. Way more than yeses. I've been turned down a lot of times, because of bad circumstances or simple lack of attraction, or who knows what, but if anything all I've learned is that not everyone is to everyone else's taste. And that's totally okay.
The problem is that you are one out of many, and most people will simply never realize that fact.
If most people followed your advice, the fact that they won't make the same realization is going to hurt their self-esteem incredibly. Or to put it another way: What works for you is NOT going to work for most other people.
feycreature said:
Sure, if you've both got the time you can start a conversation and go from there. That's always nice too (and also almost never happens to me but anyway) Sometimes you don't have time. Sometimes she doesn't have time. And the the title said "on the go". Well, if you're trying to get a stranger's number while going from point A to point B, then a polite compliment and request will either A. fail, probably with a polite but firm no, possibly with histrionics because you have unfortunately found a crazy paranoid girl who you probably wouldn't want anyway, or B. succeed and you get to go on a date with her and get to know her better.
Then you wait for another time. That simple. And if chances are that you aren't going to see that person again (coupled with the fact that you hardly know each other, IF you even know each other at all), then it's better for you to leave it, because at best your imagination is trying to work out an attachment based on superficial attraction. Not only is that a bad thing, but even if you managed to get a relationship going with the person in question in some manner, it's not good for the relationship either.
Superficial attachments like this simply aren't worth paying any ROMANTIC attention, because it just ends up doing more harm than good in 99% of all cases (even in situations where the people in question do end up making out in one way or another). Once the attachment is actually based on something more profound, even if it's just a short meeting, then chances are that the outcome is going to be a lot better.
Sure, if your goal is just to get a number or a date, your method is a shortcut, but then you aren't setting up the situation for a 'happy outcome' for neither parts involved, because neither a date nor a number is the equivalent of success. If i were to put your method into an analogy, i would say it's the equivalent of thinking that money is equal to happiness and then doing a bank-heist thinking it will allow you to live happily ever after (while in reality, it's going to put you behind bars instead, and even if you managed to spend some of the money on hookers and chocolate it's not going to be worth it). And lets be honest here:
People who asks for a date or a number ARE looking for something more. Therefore, using an approach which is unlikely to get you something more isn't very sound at all. At best you'll just be stuck with a number and a date which was more or less useless to you. At worst.... well, there is plenty of scenarios that springs to mind here.
It's a totally valid point that what works for me isn't going to work for everyone. However, getting overly invested in a potential partner before you really get started is almost guaranteed to mess things up whether they're a longtime friend or a stranger. Of course people who ask for a date are looking for something more, but think about it: the odds of meeting someone, hitting it off, dating seriously right away and living happily ever after are very slim. If certainty that things will be successful is absolutely necessary for you to consider asking someone out, then you're never going to get anywhere because you never know except by trying. If you're absolutely certain it will all go perfectly, then you're just setting yourself up for one hell of a fall. Lacklustre dates, casual dating that never goes anywhere, or even someone that you end up violently disagreeing with once you get to know them, can happen whoever initiates contact, and if you're going to be permanently damaged by this stuff happening you probably shouldn't be dating cause you're going to get mangled no matter what you do. Even someone you've known for years who you think is a perfect match might be a horrible mismatch, not into you, not looking for the same things you are, probably tons of potential problems I can't think of.
So I partly agree with you. Someone who get smashed by rejection, or whose ego can't take a few hits, should not do this. Someone who takes every potentially romantic interaction super seriously should not do this. I have to admit, I see both of those as kinda problematic issues unto themselves, things that are going to make a person miserable one way or another. And I place a lot of emphasis on having fun, not taking oneself too seriously, and being open to change. I have a hard time dealing with people who have very fragile egos or super srs outlooks on life, and if a guy approaches me to ask me out I'll assume he hasn't bought the ring yet, ya know? Under those circumstances it's a huge mistake to start trying to work out your emotional connection in your head. Results are unpredictable, all I've said is that being pleasant and confident improves your chances. There is no guarantee, ever, and there's even less of one with a stranger. You've gotta roll pretty high. But if you're going to put yourself in that situation (bearing in mind specifically what the OP was asking) then you might as well make your chances as good as you can.
Neither your safety first style nor my flinging oneself into the unknown style will work for everyone and they're not mutually exclusive within the world, there's room for both. Again, I do feel that the things which make the safety first style necessary are problematic. You can only minimize the damage by sticking to more known quantities. There is no true safety, that's why relationships are scary. Still, much as I might want to (I'm bossy by nature, a nature I do try to fight not always with success), it's not my place to decide how other people should live and I don't know every person on the planet so maybe it works for tons of people I haven't met. I do not have a statistical analysis on this ^^
I'm not saying every guy should do this. I wish
more guys (and girls) would do it though, and also that more guys and girls were able to without getting seriously damaged. I wish that second part for a lot of reasons. I never said "do this and you will get laid/married." I just said it impresses the hell outta me (and I'd be willing to bet I'm not the only one) and in most cases should improve a guy's chances, which makes it a good strategy IF you can handle rejection well enough to ask out a stranger, get turned down, and move on. Otherwise hitting on anyone on the go, hitting on girls in general, or even thinking about dating someone who isn't already slavishly devoted to you is probably a bad idea but I have no useful advice for people in that situation.
Oh gods, the run on sentences...ugh...Sorry.
So....yeah. Friends?
EDIT: actually I do need to fix something. As I've said, I don't have hard data on who can and can't take rejection, neither of us does. I've met more people who can than can't, maybe the ratio is reversed for you, but it would be difficult for either of us to prove what the answer is for MOST people.