No, no that's not what's going to happen. What's going to happen is the amount of pedantic people who treat grammar as the yardstick of civilization will continue to increase until it reaches an apex; then they will annoy everyone to death. ;DJarek Mace said:When mankind refuses to use more than one comma or full stop ('period' for Americans). The stress of reading such abominations will kill us all.
Oh shit.Grey Day for Elcia said:Oh you think so, huh?Fieldy409 said:Women will still need us for the jars.Grey Day for Elcia said:Wouldn't Snu Snu just get rid of the men? I've been reading about scientists now using DNA from lesbian partners as quasi-sperm to impregnate the other's egg. Seeing as sperm is just a carrying device for DNA, the process of replacing it with another carrier for the stuff is relatively easy (on the scale of human ability). It's not here yet, but given another, say, ten years, this form of reproduction could well leave men without a job, lol.[Esoteric Reference said:]Death by Snu Snu is the most logical end I can think of. All humans begin with it, they'll all die by it.
GLORY TO THE FAIRER SEX!
*cough*
*flexes*
I think not!
I will consider it. It depends how well you can grovel, really.Fieldy409 said:Oh shit.Grey Day for Elcia said:Oh you think so, huh?Fieldy409 said:Women will still need us for the jars.Grey Day for Elcia said:Wouldn't Snu Snu just get rid of the men? I've been reading about scientists now using DNA from lesbian partners as quasi-sperm to impregnate the other's egg. Seeing as sperm is just a carrying device for DNA, the process of replacing it with another carrier for the stuff is relatively easy (on the scale of human ability). It's not here yet, but given another, say, ten years, this form of reproduction could well leave men without a job, lol.[Esoteric Reference said:]Death by Snu Snu is the most logical end I can think of. All humans begin with it, they'll all die by it.
GLORY TO THE FAIRER SEX!
*cough*
*flexes*
I think not!
Can I please continue to live my pointless life in your glorious future?
Pleeeease?![]()
Evolution, my friend. Evolution. There's a creature (I just forgot it's name) that lives completely without the sun. We used to think, in one way or another, every living organism used the sun's effects or benefited from them via a chain. But this little guy is so deep in the ocean that not only does no sunlight or energy get to him, almost nothing at all does. It lives off underwater volcanoes or something. My point is: life finds a way.Yopaz said:50 years ago we calculated phosphor shortage in 200 years (that's 200 years from 1950) now we estimate it to happen in 50-100 years. Nitrogen shortage is also expected to hit us in about 100 years.
Loss of these will mean we wont have proteins, energy carriers, enzymes or DNA. Really, the end is going to be pretty boring with most like getting deficiencies.
Evolution takes more than 50-100 years. Our essential building block, DNA is composed of these things. Even virus, something defined as nonliving can't function without that. If a phosphor shortage does hit that is the end of everything we know as life. There might come organisms in a few million years after that aren't based on this, but right now nothing can live without DNA/RNA.Grey Day for Elcia said:I will consider it. It depends how well you can grovel, really.Fieldy409 said:Oh shit.Grey Day for Elcia said:Oh you think so, huh?Fieldy409 said:Women will still need us for the jars.Grey Day for Elcia said:Wouldn't Snu Snu just get rid of the men? I've been reading about scientists now using DNA from lesbian partners as quasi-sperm to impregnate the other's egg. Seeing as sperm is just a carrying device for DNA, the process of replacing it with another carrier for the stuff is relatively easy (on the scale of human ability). It's not here yet, but given another, say, ten years, this form of reproduction could well leave men without a job, lol.[Esoteric Reference said:]Death by Snu Snu is the most logical end I can think of. All humans begin with it, they'll all die by it.
GLORY TO THE FAIRER SEX!
*cough*
*flexes*
I think not!
Can I please continue to live my pointless life in your glorious future?
Pleeeease?![]()
Evolution, my friend. Evolution. There's a creature (I just forgot it's name) that lives completely without the sun. We used to think, in one way or another, every living organism used the sun's effects or benefited from them via a chain. But this little guy is so deep in the ocean that not only does no sunlight or energy get to him, almost nothing at all does. It lives off underwater volcanoes or something. My point is: life finds a way.Yopaz said:50 years ago we calculated phosphor shortage in 200 years (that's 200 years from 1950) now we estimate it to happen in 50-100 years. Nitrogen shortage is also expected to hit us in about 100 years.
Loss of these will mean we wont have proteins, energy carriers, enzymes or DNA. Really, the end is going to be pretty boring with most like getting deficiencies.
Captcha: "science class" 0.0
These things don't simply disappear overnight; I'm fairly certain we won't wake up one day and find an essential component for life has simply vanished.Yopaz said:Evolution takes more than 50-100 years. Our essential building block, DNA is composed of these things. Even virus, something defined as nonliving can't function without that. If a phosphor shortage does hit that is the end of everything we know as life. There might come organisms in a few million years after that aren't based on this, but right now nothing can live without DNA/RNA.Grey Day for Elcia said:I will consider it. It depends how well you can grovel, really.Fieldy409 said:Oh shit.Grey Day for Elcia said:Oh you think so, huh?Fieldy409 said:Women will still need us for the jars.Grey Day for Elcia said:Wouldn't Snu Snu just get rid of the men? I've been reading about scientists now using DNA from lesbian partners as quasi-sperm to impregnate the other's egg. Seeing as sperm is just a carrying device for DNA, the process of replacing it with another carrier for the stuff is relatively easy (on the scale of human ability). It's not here yet, but given another, say, ten years, this form of reproduction could well leave men without a job, lol.[Esoteric Reference said:]Death by Snu Snu is the most logical end I can think of. All humans begin with it, they'll all die by it.
GLORY TO THE FAIRER SEX!
*cough*
*flexes*
I think not!
Can I please continue to live my pointless life in your glorious future?
Pleeeease?![]()
Evolution, my friend. Evolution. There's a creature (I just forgot it's name) that lives completely without the sun. We used to think, in one way or another, every living organism used the sun's effects or benefited from them via a chain. But this little guy is so deep in the ocean that not only does no sunlight or energy get to him, almost nothing at all does. It lives off underwater volcanoes or something. My point is: life finds a way.Yopaz said:50 years ago we calculated phosphor shortage in 200 years (that's 200 years from 1950) now we estimate it to happen in 50-100 years. Nitrogen shortage is also expected to hit us in about 100 years.
Loss of these will mean we wont have proteins, energy carriers, enzymes or DNA. Really, the end is going to be pretty boring with most like getting deficiencies.
Captcha: "science class" 0.0
Yeah, but you might see that never said we would wake up one day to find out that it's gone. I said that we have calculated depletion to occur between 50 and 100 years from now. I also said that's too short span for evolution to save us. It took millions of years for DNA to be created, do you honestly think 50 years of evolution will be enough for us to get genes composed from something other than DNA? Do you think we'll be able to stop using proteins? Do you think we'll ever be able to stop using ATP, NADH and NADPH? Do you honestly think that in 100 years we wont need to digest glucose?Grey Day for Elcia said:These things don't simply disappear overnight; I'm fairly certain we won't wake up one day and find an essential component for life has simply vanished.Yopaz said:Evolution takes more than 50-100 years. Our essential building block, DNA is composed of these things. Even virus, something defined as nonliving can't function without that. If a phosphor shortage does hit that is the end of everything we know as life. There might come organisms in a few million years after that aren't based on this, but right now nothing can live without DNA/RNA.Grey Day for Elcia said:I will consider it. It depends how well you can grovel, really.Fieldy409 said:Oh shit.Grey Day for Elcia said:Oh you think so, huh?Fieldy409 said:Women will still need us for the jars.Grey Day for Elcia said:Wouldn't Snu Snu just get rid of the men? I've been reading about scientists now using DNA from lesbian partners as quasi-sperm to impregnate the other's egg. Seeing as sperm is just a carrying device for DNA, the process of replacing it with another carrier for the stuff is relatively easy (on the scale of human ability). It's not here yet, but given another, say, ten years, this form of reproduction could well leave men without a job, lol.[Esoteric Reference said:]Death by Snu Snu is the most logical end I can think of. All humans begin with it, they'll all die by it.
GLORY TO THE FAIRER SEX!
*cough*
*flexes*
I think not!
Can I please continue to live my pointless life in your glorious future?
Pleeeease?![]()
Evolution, my friend. Evolution. There's a creature (I just forgot it's name) that lives completely without the sun. We used to think, in one way or another, every living organism used the sun's effects or benefited from them via a chain. But this little guy is so deep in the ocean that not only does no sunlight or energy get to him, almost nothing at all does. It lives off underwater volcanoes or something. My point is: life finds a way.Yopaz said:50 years ago we calculated phosphor shortage in 200 years (that's 200 years from 1950) now we estimate it to happen in 50-100 years. Nitrogen shortage is also expected to hit us in about 100 years.
Loss of these will mean we wont have proteins, energy carriers, enzymes or DNA. Really, the end is going to be pretty boring with most like getting deficiencies.
Captcha: "science class" 0.0
You know, you haven't actually offered anything at all to support your arguments yet. All we have so far is conjecture and repeated insistence. If you can show me proof of your claims (read: peer-reviewed and accredited studies) and only then, can you have a debate. I'm hardly going to believe some random commentator in a forum that assures me the world is going to end in fifty to a hundred years, lol.Yopaz said:Yeah, but you might see that never said we would wake up one day to find out that it's gone. I said that we have calculated depletion to occur between 50 and 100 years from now. I also said that's too short span for evolution to save us. It took millions of years for DNA to be created, do you honestly think 50 years of evolution will be enough for us to get genes composed from something other than DNA? Do you think we'll be able to stop using proteins? Do you think we'll ever be able to stop using ATP, NADH and NADPH? Do you honestly think that in 100 years we wont need to digest glucose?Grey Day for Elcia said:These things don't simply disappear overnight; I'm fairly certain we won't wake up one day and find an essential component for life has simply vanished.Yopaz said:Evolution takes more than 50-100 years. Our essential building block, DNA is composed of these things. Even virus, something defined as nonliving can't function without that. If a phosphor shortage does hit that is the end of everything we know as life. There might come organisms in a few million years after that aren't based on this, but right now nothing can live without DNA/RNA.Grey Day for Elcia said:I will consider it. It depends how well you can grovel, really.Fieldy409 said:Oh shit.Grey Day for Elcia said:Oh you think so, huh?Fieldy409 said:Women will still need us for the jars.Grey Day for Elcia said:Wouldn't Snu Snu just get rid of the men? I've been reading about scientists now using DNA from lesbian partners as quasi-sperm to impregnate the other's egg. Seeing as sperm is just a carrying device for DNA, the process of replacing it with another carrier for the stuff is relatively easy (on the scale of human ability). It's not here yet, but given another, say, ten years, this form of reproduction could well leave men without a job, lol.[Esoteric Reference said:]Death by Snu Snu is the most logical end I can think of. All humans begin with it, they'll all die by it.
GLORY TO THE FAIRER SEX!
*cough*
*flexes*
I think not!
Can I please continue to live my pointless life in your glorious future?
Pleeeease?![]()
Evolution, my friend. Evolution. There's a creature (I just forgot it's name) that lives completely without the sun. We used to think, in one way or another, every living organism used the sun's effects or benefited from them via a chain. But this little guy is so deep in the ocean that not only does no sunlight or energy get to him, almost nothing at all does. It lives off underwater volcanoes or something. My point is: life finds a way.Yopaz said:50 years ago we calculated phosphor shortage in 200 years (that's 200 years from 1950) now we estimate it to happen in 50-100 years. Nitrogen shortage is also expected to hit us in about 100 years.
Loss of these will mean we wont have proteins, energy carriers, enzymes or DNA. Really, the end is going to be pretty boring with most like getting deficiencies.
Captcha: "science class" 0.0
Look at the pyrolysis. Look at the citric acid cycle. Look at oxidative phosphorolysis. Look at DNA replication. Look at DNA transcription. Look at the protein synthesis. Look the photosynthesis. When you're done with that, tell me that we don't need phosphor.
To be fair, evolution happens so gradually, whatever dominant species existing in the future may well refer to themselves as "human" even when they no longer resemble us in the slightest. Unless we're wiped out by some huge disaster.theonlyblaze2 said:In the vast future, when the sun explodes. Yeah, at that point, humanity will be LONG gone. But there is still other species on this big 'ol rock we call Earth and they'll probably outlast us by a long shot.
http://phosphorus.global-connections.nl/Grey Day for Elcia said:You know, you haven't actually offered anything at all to support your arguments yet. All we have so far is conjecture and repeated insistence. If you can show me proof of your claims (read: peer-reviewed and accredited studies) and only then, can you have a debate. I'm hardly going to believe some random commentator in a forum that assures me the world is going to end in fifty to a hundred years, lol.Yopaz said:Yeah, but you might see that never said we would wake up one day to find out that it's gone. I said that we have calculated depletion to occur between 50 and 100 years from now. I also said that's too short span for evolution to save us. It took millions of years for DNA to be created, do you honestly think 50 years of evolution will be enough for us to get genes composed from something other than DNA? Do you think we'll be able to stop using proteins? Do you think we'll ever be able to stop using ATP, NADH and NADPH? Do you honestly think that in 100 years we wont need to digest glucose?Grey Day for Elcia said:These things don't simply disappear overnight; I'm fairly certain we won't wake up one day and find an essential component for life has simply vanished.Yopaz said:Evolution takes more than 50-100 years. Our essential building block, DNA is composed of these things. Even virus, something defined as nonliving can't function without that. If a phosphor shortage does hit that is the end of everything we know as life. There might come organisms in a few million years after that aren't based on this, but right now nothing can live without DNA/RNA.Grey Day for Elcia said:I will consider it. It depends how well you can grovel, really.Fieldy409 said:Oh shit.Grey Day for Elcia said:Oh you think so, huh?Fieldy409 said:Women will still need us for the jars.Grey Day for Elcia said:Wouldn't Snu Snu just get rid of the men? I've been reading about scientists now using DNA from lesbian partners as quasi-sperm to impregnate the other's egg. Seeing as sperm is just a carrying device for DNA, the process of replacing it with another carrier for the stuff is relatively easy (on the scale of human ability). It's not here yet, but given another, say, ten years, this form of reproduction could well leave men without a job, lol.[Esoteric Reference said:]Death by Snu Snu is the most logical end I can think of. All humans begin with it, they'll all die by it.
GLORY TO THE FAIRER SEX!
*cough*
*flexes*
I think not!
Can I please continue to live my pointless life in your glorious future?
Pleeeease?![]()
Evolution, my friend. Evolution. There's a creature (I just forgot it's name) that lives completely without the sun. We used to think, in one way or another, every living organism used the sun's effects or benefited from them via a chain. But this little guy is so deep in the ocean that not only does no sunlight or energy get to him, almost nothing at all does. It lives off underwater volcanoes or something. My point is: life finds a way.Yopaz said:50 years ago we calculated phosphor shortage in 200 years (that's 200 years from 1950) now we estimate it to happen in 50-100 years. Nitrogen shortage is also expected to hit us in about 100 years.
Loss of these will mean we wont have proteins, energy carriers, enzymes or DNA. Really, the end is going to be pretty boring with most like getting deficiencies.
Captcha: "science class" 0.0
Look at the pyrolysis. Look at the citric acid cycle. Look at oxidative phosphorolysis. Look at DNA replication. Look at DNA transcription. Look at the protein synthesis. Look the photosynthesis. When you're done with that, tell me that we don't need phosphor.