Humanity's limits are irrelevant.
Soon as the technological singularity happens, humans will be obsolete.
Soon as the technological singularity happens, humans will be obsolete.
CpT_x_Killsteal said:Oh please, we'd have a decent sized colony on Mars in 10.Shock and Awe said:If humanity suddenly said "fuck fighting each other lets do cool shit" I cannot fathom what we'd do. We'd be on Mars in less then 30 years and have FTL in a century.
In 30 years we;d probably have ships off searching other solar systems and a couple planets might even be colonized even if only for mining. Cancer we'd have cured in a month, and have it distributed internationally in two.Fisher321 said:snip
What would it take to do this though? I think we need a dictator, not one of those "all hail me" dictators, I mean someone who puts a stop to violence and corruption. Basically what we need is a king from the fairy tales. most leaders today are corrupt, we need someone who will sacrifice their life for the people and carry the world on their back.
Then again religion would have to take a pretty big hit. Seeing as the deeply religious are all afraid of anything outside the mentionings of their shitty texts, so they'd fight tooth and nail and have a cry about it, but we could get rid of them eventually.
madster11 said:Within 50 years: Fully powered exosuits, probes in alpha centauri, permanent bases on the moon and mars, asteroid mining, probe either at or on the way to Sirius A/B, nuclear power, electric cars, next-gen passanger jets run scramjets, etc.Fisher321 said:Alright, if Humanity as a whole got rid of all its political, social, and economic boundaries and actually worked together in peace, how far could we reach?
That sounds a lot like what the Emperor did in Warhammer 40k and look how that turned out.madster11 said:Within 50 years: Fully powered exosuits, probes in alpha centauri, permanent bases on the moon and mars, asteroid mining, probe either at or on the way to Sirius A/B, nuclear power, electric cars, next-gen passanger jets run scramjets, etc.Fisher321 said:Alright, if Humanity as a whole got rid of all its political, social, and economic boundaries and actually worked together in peace, how far could we reach?
In 30 years we;d probably have ships off searching other solar systems and a couple planets might even be colonized even if only for mining. Cancer we'd have cured in a month, and have it distributed internationally in two.Fisher321 said:snip
Because you explode in a ridiculously oversized explosion of plasma, broken atoms and fire if you even approach the speed of light.Syzygy23 said:What is with you people and this incredibly bleak, defeatist attitude towards FTL? The laws of physics are exactly that: laws. And what do we do with laws? Obey, bend or break them.
Actually, we already have concept designs for a (in theory) functional FTL warp drive similar in concept to the ones in Star Trek. The problem is power drain rather than FTL being truly impossible, we just cannot produce enough energy to get the sucker moving with current sources.OlasDAlmighty said:Or not, because in all likelyhood FTL travel is impossible. Still though, we could at least fully inhabit the vast, unimaginable reaches of this solar system.Shock and Awe said:If humanity suddenly said "fuck fighting each other lets do cool shit" I cannot fathom what we'd do. We'd be on Mars in less then 30 years and have FTL in a century.
Also, lots of people would die. As fundamentally hazardous as space is there's no way we could start venturing out into it regularly without expecting enormous death tolls. It's just one of the many, many, many huge sacrifices we'd have to make as a species to make OP's vision a reality.
Yeah, but does it travel through physical space, or does it actually warp through the time-space continuum? If it's the first, then the first launch would be like a Tsar going off.Heronblade said:Actually, we already have concept designs for a (in theory) functional FTL warp drive similar in concept to the ones in Star Trek. The problem is power drain rather than FTL being truly impossible, we just cannot produce enough energy to get the sucker moving with current sources.OlasDAlmighty said:Or not, because in all likelyhood FTL travel is impossible. Still though, we could at least fully inhabit the vast, unimaginable reaches of this solar system.Shock and Awe said:If humanity suddenly said "fuck fighting each other lets do cool shit" I cannot fathom what we'd do. We'd be on Mars in less then 30 years and have FTL in a century.
Also, lots of people would die. As fundamentally hazardous as space is there's no way we could start venturing out into it regularly without expecting enormous death tolls. It's just one of the many, many, many huge sacrifices we'd have to make as a species to make OP's vision a reality.
Technically both, and neither. The relative velocity and acceleration of the ship remains constant, its space itself that is moving.lacktheknack said:Yeah, but does it travel through physical space, or does it actually warp through the time-space continuum? If it's the first, then the first launch would be like a Tsar going off.Heronblade said:Actually, we already have concept designs for a (in theory) functional FTL warp drive similar in concept to the ones in Star Trek. The problem is power drain rather than FTL being truly impossible, we just cannot produce enough energy to get the sucker moving with current sources.OlasDAlmighty said:Or not, because in all likelyhood FTL travel is impossible. Still though, we could at least fully inhabit the vast, unimaginable reaches of this solar system.Shock and Awe said:If humanity suddenly said "fuck fighting each other lets do cool shit" I cannot fathom what we'd do. We'd be on Mars in less then 30 years and have FTL in a century.
Also, lots of people would die. As fundamentally hazardous as space is there's no way we could start venturing out into it regularly without expecting enormous death tolls. It's just one of the many, many, many huge sacrifices we'd have to make as a species to make OP's vision a reality.
Sounds like a glorified planet cracker. But yeah, that sounds waaaaay beyond our current capacity to power up, let alone test and make usable. Excuse me while I have my doubts.Heronblade said:Technically both, and neither. The relative velocity and acceleration of the ship remains constant, its space itself that is moving.lacktheknack said:Yeah, but does it travel through physical space, or does it actually warp through the time-space continuum? If it's the first, then the first launch would be like a Tsar going off.Heronblade said:Actually, we already have concept designs for a (in theory) functional FTL warp drive similar in concept to the ones in Star Trek. The problem is power drain rather than FTL being truly impossible, we just cannot produce enough energy to get the sucker moving with current sources.OlasDAlmighty said:Or not, because in all likelyhood FTL travel is impossible. Still though, we could at least fully inhabit the vast, unimaginable reaches of this solar system.Shock and Awe said:If humanity suddenly said "fuck fighting each other lets do cool shit" I cannot fathom what we'd do. We'd be on Mars in less then 30 years and have FTL in a century.
Also, lots of people would die. As fundamentally hazardous as space is there's no way we could start venturing out into it regularly without expecting enormous death tolls. It's just one of the many, many, many huge sacrifices we'd have to make as a species to make OP's vision a reality.
The potential downside is that when the thing actually stops moving, according to calculations, a massive burst of energy is released in outward directions, particularly in front of the vehicle's path. It shouldn't harm the ship itself, but if we cannot find a way to offset this, a careless pilot could blow his destination to smithereens.
Er, doesn't quite work that way, you still have length from your PoV, you just look like you don't from someone else's. Mass increase is going to be an issue, though.Reece Borgars said:Just a point to anyone who thinks we may have achieved FTL travel by now - we wouldnt, for the simple fact that anything with a mass cannot achieve it.
We can come very close (in theory) but it is impossible - as you approach the speed of light you begin to contract. The closer you get the light speed, the more you contract, to the point where, when you reached light speed, you would have exactly 0 length. This essentially means you would not be made of matter if you reached light speed, and that, if we reverse it, nothing with a mass (ie, all matter in the universe) can reach light speed.
sorry to burst your bubbles.
on a slightly more positive note though, instantaneous travel (like tardis materialisation) is theoratically possible, as it requires no velocity at all. the problems lie around the issue of working out how the hell it might work
*Darkhands you* >:3 (nice fallout ref btwLiquidcool said:Humanity's limit is 99 OH HO HO. Little Dark Souls reference there.
On topic though if we can't achieve FTL speed then our space exploration-options are pretty limited I think. But I bet it's possible. Although Earth has served us well so far so I just hope that there aren't any nuclear winters in our future. I'd rather patrol the Mojave than endure one of those.
The other downsides are that the bubble produces Hawking radiation that would obliterate anything inside the bubble, and the inside of the bubble is causally disconnected from the edge, meaning you can't turn off or steer such a drive. Also, the drive requires the existence of exotic matter with negative energy, which does not necessarily exist. You also can't form the bubble without moving the exotic matter faster than light speed - in other words, you need an FTL drive to make an FTL drive.Heronblade said:Technically both, and neither. The relative velocity and acceleration of the ship remains constant, its space itself that is moving.lacktheknack said:Yeah, but does it travel through physical space, or does it actually warp through the time-space continuum? If it's the first, then the first launch would be like a Tsar going off.Heronblade said:Actually, we already have concept designs for a (in theory) functional FTL warp drive similar in concept to the ones in Star Trek. The problem is power drain rather than FTL being truly impossible, we just cannot produce enough energy to get the sucker moving with current sources.OlasDAlmighty said:Or not, because in all likelyhood FTL travel is impossible. Still though, we could at least fully inhabit the vast, unimaginable reaches of this solar system.Shock and Awe said:If humanity suddenly said "fuck fighting each other lets do cool shit" I cannot fathom what we'd do. We'd be on Mars in less then 30 years and have FTL in a century.
Also, lots of people would die. As fundamentally hazardous as space is there's no way we could start venturing out into it regularly without expecting enormous death tolls. It's just one of the many, many, many huge sacrifices we'd have to make as a species to make OP's vision a reality.
The potential downside is that when the thing actually stops moving, according to calculations, a massive burst of energy is released in outward directions, particularly in front of the vehicle's path. It shouldn't harm the ship itself, but if we cannot find a way to offset this, a careless pilot could blow his destination to smithereens.
Removal of political boundaries as in humanity uniting under one banner, not eliminate government completely.serious biscuit said:Sorry to disappoint, but there's no way that humanity will ever come together, its our nature to fight mainly because of opinion and because on a whole we are very self centered anyone who has a different view to you is wrong, and therefore you wouldn't want to associate with them. Furthermore getting rid of the boundaries mentioned would just cause more problems, for instance no politics means no government and no government means no laws which means total anarchy, people need to be told what to do/think and they need to be governed otherwise primal intrinsic will kick in and with no consequences you'll start doing whatever you feel like because it isn't right or wrong; this would also create a bigger wedge in society where people will group off and start their own 'utopias' with their own ideal laws.Fisher321 said:snip
And with no economy how do you expect for people to work for the common goal? Because no matter how good it is for all of us, no one will do it for free because everyone wants some short term return on their work.
That was in theory true back when the drive was originally introduced, when it was still slated to take approximately the entire mass energy of Jupiter to power. The design specs have changed a wee bit since then.Redingold said:The other downsides are that the bubble produces Hawking radiation that would obliterate anything inside the bubble, and the inside of the bubble is causally disconnected from the edge, meaning you can't turn off or steer such a drive. Also, the drive requires the existence of exotic matter with negative energy, which does not necessarily exist. You also can't form the bubble without moving the exotic matter faster than light speed - in other words, you need an FTL drive to make an FTL drive.Heronblade said:Technically both, and neither. The relative velocity and acceleration of the ship remains constant, its space itself that is moving.lacktheknack said:Yeah, but does it travel through physical space, or does it actually warp through the time-space continuum? If it's the first, then the first launch would be like a Tsar going off.Heronblade said:Actually, we already have concept designs for a (in theory) functional FTL warp drive similar in concept to the ones in Star Trek. The problem is power drain rather than FTL being truly impossible, we just cannot produce enough energy to get the sucker moving with current sources.OlasDAlmighty said:Or not, because in all likelyhood FTL travel is impossible. Still though, we could at least fully inhabit the vast, unimaginable reaches of this solar system.Shock and Awe said:If humanity suddenly said "fuck fighting each other lets do cool shit" I cannot fathom what we'd do. We'd be on Mars in less then 30 years and have FTL in a century.
Also, lots of people would die. As fundamentally hazardous as space is there's no way we could start venturing out into it regularly without expecting enormous death tolls. It's just one of the many, many, many huge sacrifices we'd have to make as a species to make OP's vision a reality.
The potential downside is that when the thing actually stops moving, according to calculations, a massive burst of energy is released in outward directions, particularly in front of the vehicle's path. It shouldn't harm the ship itself, but if we cannot find a way to offset this, a careless pilot could blow his destination to smithereens.
The Alcubierre drive is a cute piece of mathematics as a solution to Einstein's field equations, but there's nothing to suggest that it's practical in the slightest.