I abhor the Olympics.

Recommended Videos

Dwarfman

New member
Oct 11, 2009
918
0
0
In Search of Username said:
Dwarfman said:
In Search of Username said:
And specifically rooting for one team against the other - why?
Because it's YOUR TEAM & COLOURS & CITY & STATE. You take pride in it the same way someone takes pride in their uniform or flag or customized gaming computer. That pride turns to passion and single-minded patriotism. It makes the blood boil and endorphins surge through your body. It makes you giddy and exhillerated, angry and lust-filled for more.

You mightn't understand these things because you have only watched these thing on TV and in a small way I was like you once. I never liked or understood football (soccer). To me it was dull and boring and served no purpose. Then I was invited to a game by my Exec. Chef who is Scottish - enough said! I had my doubts and even turned him down at first. But then I went. It was only a small crowd. Maybe a few thousand. But the roars, the cheers, the expectations and let downs and then at long last GOOOOAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!

The team we were watching actually lost that night. But no matter I was hooked. Nowadays when ever I get the chance to see a game I'm there with the rest of the orange army to see my TWO TIME! TWO TIME! A-League champions Brisbane Roar in action.
I don't take pride in my uniform or flag or customised gaming computer either, so I guess there's the problem. :p Anyway what's the explanation for people supporting teams that have nothing to do with them personally then? I know plenty of people who support football teams that aren't from places they have any personal attachment to. It just seems like an arbitrary choice. Oh, and if it's all about the excitement of being there watching the game itself, why do people even follow specific teams closely enough to care who won if they weren't there watching? Pah, none of it makes sense to me.
You don't HAVE to be there to enjoy the game. It just helps you understand where all these fanatic types come from. I've never been at a State of Origin match but my family and I will watch all three games and yell and scream for all we're worth even if it is at a TV. I think what I was trying to put forward to you is that its a purely emotive concept. It's something you can't explain through the wonders of science beyond the usual brain, electrons, endorphins etc. And that really does make things sound boring! No at the end of the day it's an expression of emotion.

As for people supporting other teams from other places. I'll partly agree with you there. As far as I'm concerned if you can't support your own team don't even bother. That being said there are many different leagues from many different sports. Going back to football the English premier league is considered by many to be the best football league in the world. If that's the case and you have an interest in football then why wouldn't you get into it. That being said I'll watch EPL but I'll happily 'oohh' and 'aaahhh' for both teams playing. They aren't my team but that doesn't mean I can't enjoy a good match.

As for pride. I take pride in my chef's uniform as it is a symbol of three and a half years of blood, sweat and burns to get to where I am today. I take pride in the achievements of my family and friends. All of these things listed here and in my previous statement were simple examples of the same emotion. Pride. So what do you have pride in? Your achievements. Your job. Don't tell me nothing cause that would be telling porkys. Everyone has pride in something. Something that ... I dunno helps them get up in the mornings, makes them keep ticking on, makes them themself.
 

Odbarc

Elite Member
Jun 30, 2010
1,154
0
41
You watched the worst, least entertaining form of reality TV in existence.
Right there. People are stupid and will watch anything.

I've never watched any of the Olympic events. None of it is interesting. A lot of it is just REALLY stupid pointless human talents (diving? what?!).
What I really hate is when everything looks so completely identical that judges have to tell me why it was special and different from each other.
At least with sports (which I also do not watch because it is boring) you can at least tell who scored and why they're winning.
 

AngloDoom

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,461
0
0
Jailbird408 said:
I see no point in the Olympics, or any sport for that matter, whatsoever. Take hockey, for example. You watch twenty or so burly blokes whack a puck around and MAYBE get it into the net for about an hour. What could you have done in that hour?
Play videogames? No, wait...

I've made this argument a dozen times, and every time I get the same answer: a sense of pride, that someone from YOUR hometown, home state or home country is the best of the best. The lesser scales do make sense to me, but I'm sorry: why should I care about some pumped-up athlete I've never met who probably has nothing in common with me?
I personally like watching a sport to see how well it is played - if someone for my country wins then horray for us, but I'm just in it to see people play a sport well.

Then I realise that the Olympics is just WAY more popular than it should be.
That doesn't make sense, unless it's brainwashing people.

The event itself is many times more popular and loved than any scientist, doctor or non-corrupt politician could ever hope to be.
So is Coke-Cola. Why is this a bad thing?

All that money they spent on sports could have gone somewhere useful. Like the medical industry.
And it saddens me.
So could anything, but as human-beings we need some release from productivity and watching other people exercise is perfect for that.

This opinion will almost certainly get me struck down. But I'm going to go down knowing I'm the only sane person on this whole goddamn planet.
...
By the way, if you spot an error in this post... do you really think I care?
I wouldn't at all of 'struck you down' until you posted how your opinions are, by default, sane and the confrontational attitude you take at the end.

I'm going to have to agree with your mother on this one: take a chill-pill and just learn to accept other people's views. The Olympics wouldn't be so popular if there wasn't some appeal in it but if it's not for you then simply don't watch it and move on.

Now, football- there's something to hate =D
 

Robert632

New member
May 11, 2009
3,870
0
0
In Search of Username said:
Robert632 said:
Anyway, question time; In any fictional piece of work, why should you care about any of the characters? Sure, we get to see them develop, but all the character development in the world doesn't change one simple fact.

They are not real.

What's the point? Why care about someone that doesn't exist? Why waste your time learning about someone who you can never meet?
I think that's the key thing - you get to see them develop, understand what they represent, and ultimately decide whether you like them as people. People participating in sports will always just be some numbers on a field to me, they don't represent anything, which of them wins has absolutely no meaning. When the good guys win in fiction, it's to be celebrated as a triumph of good over evil - when the one you were supporting wins in a sport, it's nothing, it's a triumph of neutral over neutral. That's the only way I've ever been able to see it anyway. Which is why I can understand participating in sports - you naturally want to win, that's your motivation - but watching professional sports is a completely weird thing to me.
Most people who watch sports have a team/person they favour because they represent something to them. Be it a team/person that represents their hometown, region, or country or whatever, they mean something to them.

You don't have that pride in seeing the team that means something to you win because you personally have no team that means anything to you. You have no stake, emotionally or physically in sports, much like a person who doesn't like a particular series doesn't have an emotional stake in that series. It doesn't make them wrong, just that they personally don't like it, thus they don't really care about it.
 

rosac

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,204
0
0
In Search of Username said:
I think that's the key thing - you get to see them develop, understand what they represent, and ultimately decide whether you like them as people. People participating in sports will always just be some numbers on a field to me, they don't represent anything, which of them wins has absolutely no meaning. When the good guys win in fiction, it's to be celebrated as a triumph of good over evil - when the one you were supporting wins in a sport, it's nothing, it's a triumph of neutral over neutral. That's the only way I've ever been able to see it anyway. Which is why I can understand participating in sports - you naturally want to win, that's your motivation - but watching professional sports is a completely weird thing to me.
If you look at the road that the athletes have to take to the olympics... that is development of the highest kind in my own opinion. These guys don't just win because they have always been good, they have taken knocks and gotten back up, to try again and again until they are the best they can be.

For example, Usain Bolt had scoliosis, but went on to become the worlds fastest man, despite all the naysayers telling him his attitude and physical attributes mean he shouldn't be a sprinter.

The paralympian Nathan Stephens, the world record holder for the Javelin throw in a paralympic games, was run over by a train aged 9, losing both his legs, and yet he managed to achieve so much. I can't understand how people don't find this and other stories inspirational.

And as for neutral vs. neutral argument, I can see where you are coming from, but seeing evenly matched athletes competing at near superhuman levels in an event they have been preparing for all their lives is something special. Just because it isn't good vs. evil doesn't make it worthless.
 

dubious_wolf

Obfuscated Information
Jun 4, 2009
584
0
0
You know what else is a waste of time? Writing overly long rants about things you hate, on the internet. Man if we stopped writing useless posts about useless personal opinions we could cure aidscancer.
 

Gxas

New member
Sep 4, 2008
3,187
0
0
Dwarfman said:
As for people supporting other teams from other places. I'll partly agree with you there. As far as I'm concerned if you can't support your own team don't even bother. That being said there are many different leagues from many different sports. Going back to football the English premier league is considered by many to be the best football league in the world. If that's the case and you have an interest in football then why wouldn't you get into it. That being said I'll watch EPL but I'll happily 'oohh' and 'aaahhh' for both teams playing. They aren't my team but that doesn't mean I can't enjoy a good match.
I know many people who were born during the few years that Cleveland did not have the Browns, our pro-football (American football) team. In order to thoroughly enjoy the sport, because they did love to watch it, they were forced to find another team to root for. Once the Browns were brought back to Cleveland, they didn't just throw the team they had rooted for before out the window though. That team will always be their first.

My uncle moved from Cleveland to Boston after college. He is still a Cleveland Indians fan at heart, despite living in Boston where the Red Sox are the hometeam for baseball.

I, at age seven, began loving hockey. Ohio did not have a team in the NHL, so I was given free-reign to choose a team to cheer for. I chose the Pittsburgh Penguins. Years later, the Columbus Blue Jackets were born, giving Ohio their very own NHL team. My team is still the Penguins. I hold no love for the BJs because they were not around when I needed them to be.

Just a few examples of why someone might cheer for a team that is "not theirs".

(Also, during the World Cup I cheer for Brazil because I, as a kid, noticed them before anyone else in the tourney. And in the Winter Olympics, you bet your ass that Canada is taking home the gold in hockey over the US.)
 

lord.jeff

New member
Oct 27, 2010
1,468
0
0
First people would probably listen more if you weren't a right out ass.

Now time for my points, you compare it to reality TV like it's instantly a bad thing, it isn't it's just something you and myself don't like, big difference between don't like and bad. Even further there is a major difference between sports and most reality TV, sports focuses on achievement, reality TV is mostly about making fools of contestants, it's cheering versus ridiculing. Lastly the Olympics are a big deal, I don't care for sports myself I only tend to watch the opening ceremonies because an event that has that many people from all over the world, some of the very important, gathering is a big deal.
 

BodomBeachChild

New member
Nov 12, 2009
338
0
0
You don't want to sit and watch womens beach volleyball? dafuq?
On a serious note your rant was pretty self-absorbed and no, not everyone or most people (even those who dislike sports) can agree. For once this thing is almost 120 years old. The international, not original. So for 120 years almost every country in the world puts their differences aside (publicily) for the spirit of atheletic competition. Sure we may go back to wanting the worst for eachother, but for now it's just a big awesome competition.

Would a month long WoW torney get your rocks off or something? Dude, you play video games. The biggest waste of time I know of. I've wasted years playing them. These people, atheletes, spend years trying to achieve and stay in peak physical shape. You spend days trying to beat a boss and Oxicleaning Cheeto dust outta your shirt. The money you throw at this industry is just as useful for other things as all the money thrown into the Olympics. If that all that wasted money and potential make you that mad do this for me: Stop buying games, stop paying for internet, stop paying for cable, don't buy gas to get to Gamestop and give your money to some medical charity or something.
 
Aug 25, 2009
4,609
0
0
Yeah I hate the Olympics as well.

You know what my solution was? I don't watch it.

I don't visit bars that have Olympic coverage, they have live music. I don't turn my television on to channels that cover the Olympics. I don't pay a single jot of attention any news headline with the word 'Olympic' in it, unless it's talking about something going horribly wrong, because I want the Conservatives to be remembered for one of the worst Olympic games in memory. I'm talking 'Jesse Owens winning the Berlin Olympics' level of blow to their regime.

Although I did watch some of the opening ceremony. When I heard the rumour that Mary Poppins would fight Lord Voldemort I had to know if it was true. Then it was and I turned my tv off and hung my head, for the first time ever truly ashamed to be British, because it meant I was counted as a part of that farce.
 

Ljs1121

New member
Mar 17, 2011
1,112
0
0
I'm not a big fan of sports, but it's pretty cool that tons of nations can just come together and play some games like that.

Also, the Winter Olympics are way better because of FREAKING CURLING.

 

Blade_125

New member
Sep 1, 2011
224
0
0
I'm sorry but this is a rather silly rant. You might as well be yelling at someone for liking specific music, or food, or tv show, or movie. Sports is entertainment. I love watching hockey and football, and don't mind watching soccer or baseball. I find basketball very boring, and aside from a few winter olympic sports I generally avoid paying attention to any of it.

Many people will have different opinions than I, and that is ok. It's all about entertainment. You don't like sports and that is fine, but questioning why someone else does isn't going to get you anywhere. You might as well argue for why your favorite colour is the best colour out there.

To go with your analogy, instead of typing up your rant you could have done something more productive with your time.
 

xXGeckoXx

New member
Jan 29, 2009
1,778
0
0
Jailbird408 said:
The Olympics are one of the few places for athletes to compete at the top of their game. Olympic athletes are not like commercial footballers, hockey players so on, those take skill but olympic athletes are a different league. They train extremely hard to push themselves to the absolute limits of human ability in their respective sports, often for little reward and a short career due to aging. The Olympics give them a place to use these skills to compete against others who are that good.

Also it is just like any part of the entertainment industry, from the perspective of viewers, it is the mother of all sporting events for those who enjoy watching a particular sport and want to see the creme de la crop of that sport.

For example I happen to enjoy watching judo, swimming and gymnastics and also participate casually two of these sports. As a person who understands in these sports I therefore gain an enjoyment of watching people preform extremely well. I mean have you ever watched the gymnastics, what those people do is so fucking insane, they push their bodies to the limit and often they have 90 seconds to decide their fate. If they lose focus for a couple milliseconds they could make a tiny mistake which will put them below the others, these people train their entire lives for those moments and I think it's fair we give them a shot.

As for the productivity of the Olympics. I think it's good for morale, and it also brings taxes and publicity to the hosting country.

Dwarfman said:
In terms of sport I take pride in very little, my home team this Olympics is Great Britain but I take no pride in the fact that the athlete is from my country representing us. I take pride in the skill of the athlete representing his sport. So yeah I support teams that are not my own, depending on the sport and context I either support the winner or both sides. I mean in Olympic games everyone is giving it their all, there rarely is such thing as a bad game and even the loser made such a huge effort it deserves support.

So that's an example of someone who does not support the home team, sometimes I even go against them when I see an interesting match, perhaps one where on side is losing but really deserves to win.

Occasionally I found that supporting a team can be a little unfair. I mean I was at the judo finals yesterday and when the British guy lost the crowd boo-ed the victor. Dude won fair and square.
 

CentralScrtnzr

New member
May 2, 2011
104
0
0
I actually also abhor the Olympics, but for completely different reasons.

I suppose as an amateur classicist, I take umbrage with the manner in which the games were modernized. The Olympics were a sacred series of games to honor Zeus in one of his aspects; they were serious business; priests performed rituals; sacrifices were conducted. Certainly the games did honor athletic virtue, and that was part of their point, but it doesn't seem the same with the way athletics are typically conducted nowadays.

I suppose I merely take offense that an ancient title is being applied to a set of athletic competitions that have really nothing to do with the original. The title is merely used to give it an ancient mystique.

I fear I may seem to be angry that the neighborhood kids are on my lawn.
 

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,186
0
0
Considering your first point is about all of the things you could be doing instead of watching sport. One could quite easily ask what you could have been doing instead of writing out this rant, hmmm?

Although to be honest it's obvious that you realise that threads like these are sure to get attention, so you made it with the hope of getting it. Most likely with the intention of getting a badge for lot's of replies.
 

CentralScrtnzr

New member
May 2, 2011
104
0
0
xXGeckoXx said:
Jailbird408 said:
The Olympics are one of the few places for athletes to compete at the top of their game. Olympic athletes are not like commercial footballers, hockey players so on, those take skill but olympic athletes are a different league. They train extremely hard to push themselves to the absolute limits of human ability in their respective sports, often for little reward and a short career due to aging. The Olympics give them a place to use these skills to compete against others who are that good.

Also it is just like any part of the entertainment industry, from the perspective of viewers, it is the mother of all sporting events for those who enjoy watching a particular sport and want to see the creme de la crop of that sport.

For example I happen to enjoy watching judo, swimming and gymnastics and also participate casually two of these sports. As a person who understands in these sports I therefore gain an enjoyment of watching people preform extremely well. I mean have you ever watched the gymnastics, what those people do is so fucking insane, they push their bodies to the limit and often they have 90 seconds to decide their fate. If they lose focus for a couple milliseconds they could make a tiny mistake which will put them below the others, these people train their entire lives for those moments and I think it's fair we give them a shot.

As for the productivity of the Olympics. I think it's good for morale, and it also brings taxes and publicity to the hosting country.

Dwarfman said:
In terms of sport I take pride in very little, my home team this Olympics is Great Britain but I take no pride in the fact that the athlete is from my country representing us. I take pride in the skill of the athlete representing his sport. So yeah I support teams that are not my own, depending on the sport and context I either support the winner or both sides. I mean in Olympic games everyone is giving it their all, there rarely is such thing as a bad game and even the loser made such a huge effort it deserves support.

So that's an example of someone who does not support the home team, sometimes I even go against them when I see an interesting match, perhaps one where on side is losing but really deserves to win.

Occasionally I found that supporting a team can be a little unfair. I mean I was at the judo finals yesterday and when the British guy lost the crowd boo-ed the victor. Dude won fair and square.
Actually, Olympic athletes tend to be relative amateurs in many of the competitions described. You should look up the "Dream Team" sometime. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_United_States_men%27s_Olympic_basketball_team

When they actually placed active NBA players into the Olympics, the competition never had a chance. It was professionals playing against relative amateurs.

The Olympians are not in a class all their own. Olympians tend to be very young, often younger than 18; as a consequence, they're fairly inexperienced.
 
Jun 11, 2008
5,329
0
0
My eyes, they burn at the lack of real paragraphs! Seriously though kinda an eyesore but I read it all and I don't agree. I am however, going to agree with another user that said you are coming across kinda Jack Thompson like with your attitude towards Sports though.