> Leigh's corruption stems from the fact that her article and a bunch more all attacking gamers happened at the same time.
...mainly in response to the Zoe Quinn bullshit, which was toxic. And still, it's all just opinion. I see no corruption. Who bought who? What's the theory here? A bunch of journalists got together and worked out how to piss off their readership? Why?
And what about the *real* corruption going on? Why is gamergate always going on about Zoe and Anita and Leigh?
...mainly in response to the Zoe Quinn bullshit, which was toxic. And still, it's all just opinion. I see no corruption. Who bought who? What's the theory here? A bunch of journalists got together and worked out how to piss off their readership? Why?
And what about the *real* corruption going on? Why is gamergate always going on about Zoe and Anita and Leigh?