I despise the very concept of superheroes

Recommended Videos

IamLEAM1983

Neloth's got swag.
Aug 22, 2011
2,578
0
0
Brawndo said:
"Superheroes don't represent me!"
Well, the fact is - they do. Look at it from a literary perspective. Bradford Wright and several other scholars have observed that the archetypal comic book hero resembles the heroes of Greek myth and tragedy: Oedipus was marked by the Fates and Peter Parker got stuck in a pretty damn well fateful situation that changes from incarnation to incarnation, but the end result is the same. Greek heroes and Karmic pincushions are exactly like superheroes in that, to quote the delicious cornball that is Loki, they're "burdened with glorious purpose".

We generally tend to have a hard time exploring the finer aspects of human nature through art by sticking to purely mundane settings. Even Goncharov's "Oblomov" deals with a fabulously idle Russian nobleman who has more than enough dosh to while his days away in his favourite couch. In an effort to explore the theme of laziness or procrastination, the author puts together a character who has the unusual means to be just that epically lazy. So lazy, in fact, that it kills him in the end.

When's the last time you had to run around extinguishing metaphorical forest fires left and right? I sure haven't, with the most serious stuff I've had to handle in thirty years of existence being job interviews and my own tendency to put things off to tomorrow. You sure couldn't use my life's story as a model of what the noblest of Humanity would do when put under duress. A few thousand years ago, duress was the Gods choosing to lay a Karmic whammy down on you for the lulz. Today, it's the Chitauri invading New York or Bane locking Gotham City down.

As this is what superheroes have been created for. It's in our nature to keep questioning what we'd do in extraordinary situations, or what we'd want to do if we could do more than what we can. We've all idly fantasized on what our life would be like if we had a couple million dollars burning a hole in our pockets, right? Considering, going from that to wanting to figure out what happens when you can design synthetic webbing that's resistant enough to hold your weight and when you have a spider's proportionate acrobatic skills doesn't seem so strange.

I'll admit, however, that there's some cases where a character veers away from honest experimentation and nosedives into Gary Stu-ism. Any fabulously wealthy type runs the risk of falling into that pit, as does anyone with regenerative abilities or general immortality. The thing is that thankfully, most comic book writers seem to focus on the human element - as opposed to what I've seen some other writers do.

You want an example of someone who handles this extremely poorly? Try Anne Rice's later Vampire Chronicles. Louis and Lestat start out being complex and engaging enough, but by the time we reach "Blood and Gold"; one's been reduced to tearful soliloquies and the other's been inflated to Insufferable Godmoded Fanfic Character. Anne Rice's blond baby can do absolutely no wrong, so he gets all the toys, all the abilities, all of the money, all of the attention. Christ, he's even been able to kiss the actual Shroud of Turin in the previous books, or to take a daytime stroll through the Gobi desert!

So much for being a vampire, right?

The thing is, Rice forgot her initial goals. Her vampires, like most superheroes, started out as a means to explore themes of loneliness or isolation amongst marginals. That's a fairly common trope for vampires. Then, just around the same time us geeky or nerdy types started to gain representation - Lestat shifted gears. His insolence wasn't the product of brazen confidence in the face of adversity anymore - it was basic verbal masturbation and blatant wish fulfillment.

Then, as we all know, Stan Rice kicked the bucket, she got massively depressed, found Jeebus and rejected her previous works. Yawn.

So comic book characters are prone to the same excesses, depending on who writes them. Some people will put together wonderfully deep storylines for Batman et al., while others basically go "Oh hey, he's a billionaire! COOL TOYS AHOY, #SWAG." It's a pretty serious case of missing the point, but what can you do?

Superheroes are different things for different people.
 

gargantual

New member
Jul 15, 2013
416
0
0
Brawndo said:
When one looks at superhero franchises like Superman and X-Men, or fantasy works like Harry Potter, the common characteristic is the existence of a super-human class with genetic and innate traits that make them superior to regular humans. In all of these works of fiction, humans are at the complete mercy of these Ubermensch to save us because we are too weak to do it ourselves. And what's more, human attempts to level the playing field with technology are generally rendered ineffective because most superheroes and supervillains are conveniently immune to human weapons.

How can works of fiction that exist primarily to celebrate the innate superiority of one group of persons over the rest of humanity be so popular? What does this say about us? In the 19th century, some intellectuals subscribed to the flawed theory that the bulk of human progress could be attributed to the efforts a small number of "super men" through history. This worldview is related to eugenics, Social Darwinism, Randian thought, and all kinds of other superiority theories. I don't consider that crap to be much different than superhero worship.

There are no super men. Although there have been standout examples of great people through history, all of them were assisted in innumerable ways by other people. Human progress is the product of human collaboration, and not the product of a few.

The only superheroes I can abide are those who gain their powers through technology, such as Batman and Ironman. Screw Superman.

- A proud Muggle and Non-Mutant
I presume from this entry, that the creation of Superman was perhaps an unhealthy way for Jerry Siegel to artistically cope with the death of his father.

I'd simply reference graphic novel 'Kingdom Come' or the first Spiderman as an answer to whats wrong with Superherodom, and perhaps a serious look at the impact of how even popular history is told and news is reported. So much news is saturated in superficiality that miss the point of what viewers can learn. So much history has rewritten and influenced by imperialism to cover up closet skeletons, protect pedigree and to shame discourage the legacy of other societies deemed inferior.

We do need more team stories that highlight true human dependence and the importance of teamwork. Especially in conflict.

Some (now I won't go this far) even go so far as criticize the very practice of telling fiction as immoral and keeping the mind from being grounded with ones immediate reality, limitations and responsibilities, or hiding social truths that need to be revealed because of reliance on symbolism.

Now we've all seen fictitious works and comic books defy these problems of not being grounded in true human struggle and overlooking the legacy of non western societies and people and succeed in telling uplifting stories. Stories that sometime inspire people to find a little strength in themselves, when they don't have the same amount of faculty from the people around them.

The problem isn't the medium, its how it's delivered, WHO is wearing the cape and what should the reader or viewer take away from it?
 

gargantual

New member
Jul 15, 2013
416
0
0
CaptOfSerenity said:
There's a reason that there are meaningful differences between "superheroes" and "supervillains." The heroes aren't just wish-fulfillment, they are meant to be paragons that we can aspire to, morally. They have powers that could level cities, but instead use them to protect us because they were raised to believe that life is precious, or to believe in empathy. See Peter Parker and Clark Kent for examples.

Those reasons apply to Bruce Wayne, as well, who could be a selfish prick with all of his money but instead uses it to fight crime. There are selfish reasons endemic to all of these characters, but human beings are also selfish. They take after us, too.

The villains don't have empathy, and they exist to show what irresponsible or reprehensible people could do with similar abilities. Superheroes don't exist to perpetuate class warfare.
Yeah! and it's not like this is a hard concept to understand. If there was no Spiderman and ALL fictious superbeings just walked about oppressing people tossing subtle bigoted master race propaganda into all of their stories, THEN we would have an issue with power fantasies in fiction. but readers do understand there is a balance to be had with all inclusions of extraordinary agency in fiction, and 2nd it's "fiction" for cryin out loud! The disclaimer has already been established that the reader is engaging in a work of UN truth.

There's no epidemic of folks being mind warped into backwards perception of reality from indulging this stuff. On the contrary, people do often because they are Keenly aware of their own reality.
 

Tsukuyomi

New member
May 28, 2011
308
0
0
It's funny that the OP references Superman considering that, as Mark Waid once put it:

"Gods achieve their power by encouraging us to believe in them. Superman achieves his power by believing in us."

Despite his innate superior skills, Superman is often portrayed as very reluctant if not outright against simply super-fixing problems beyond the usual 'saving the day' bit. His powers and skills have always varied over the years but more than once it has been to the point that the man could do ANYTHING he felt like doing. Cure Cancer? probably. End Global Warming? He'd find a way. Broker World Peace? Oh come on who's not gonna sign up?

But he doesn't do those things. He doesn't simply take the world into his palm and make it perfect. In fact in almost all the stories in which he DOES do such, things to go shit rather quickly. And even when he does it, it's because he feels there is genuinely no other option, and it is done with the best of his intentions. Superman: Red Son is the most notable example of this, and a fun read besides.

Everyone deserves equality, yes. Everyone deserves a chance at greatness, yes. Everyone deserves the same civil rights, freedoms, etc. Everyone should have their shot to live their lives however they like no matter who they are. But we're not all born the same. That's just how nature works. I'm short and a little pudgy, been that way all my life since I was a baby. A friend of mine is tall and wouldn't be able to gain body-mass if his life depended on it, and that's how he's always been.

honestly OP, you're reading too far into things. Way too far. Funnily enough your rhetoric reminds me of a bit of dialogue from All-Star Superman:

Lex Luthor: "DON'T YOU SEE?! I COULD HAVE CURED CANCER! I COULD HAVE SAVED THE WORLD IF IT WASN'T FOR YOU!"

Superman: "You could have saved the world a long time ago if it really mattered to you, Luthor."
 

Tom_green_day

New member
Jan 5, 2013
1,383
0
0
I'll agree with OP, I'm not a fan of superheroes nor their films. My favourite films are Wayne's World, Mad Max 2 and Pirates of the Caribbean. Protagonists are all human, and flawed at that.
One exception though is Kick-Ass, I really really loved that film. It was because, while the protagonist was a 'super-hero', he was just a normal guy at heart and from the film's perspective you know that he's just some regular Joe trying to be something better. The thing missing from superhero film is that little human element.
 

DanDeFool

Elite Member
Aug 19, 2009
1,891
0
41
Norithics said:
Julius Terrell said:
I kind of agree with you, but that's probably because I'm more of a fan of how japan does things.
... Y'mean Super Robot and Super Sentai? I'm having trouble parsing the meaningful differences here.
In those genres, there's usually not anything inherently superior about the protagonists. At the most, they have exceptional talents in one or two distinct fields, but nothing superhuman. And there's usually the impression that a similarly-trained average Joe could pilot the giant robot or wear the magical super suit.

Anime and magna are much more frequently in the vein of "this person is better because they work harder than you, or because they were in the right(?) place at the right(?) time", as opposed to, "this person is better than you because they just are".
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,397
0
0
innocentEX said:
Queen Michael said:
innocentEX said:
Technically Ironman is not 'normal' either as he was genetically modified before birth.
We talking movies or comics here?
Comics... I guess if we take the movies as canon then he is on the same playing field as batman.
Oh goodie, I was afraid you'd spoiled Iron Man 3. The movie theater was closed the day I went to see it.
 

greatcheezer2021

New member
Oct 18, 2011
82
0
0
superheroes are just people with super powers. there are no super heroes or super villains.
there is only the maleficence and beneficence of humankind which is further enhanced by their powers, which creates gripping drama, which people eat up and love.
 

Night_S1ash

New member
Feb 6, 2011
52
0
0
I think you are missing the point of X-Men.
There entire story is about being treated as second class citizens; almost hunted to extinction and even being arrested for simply existing. (Heavy parallels with the Jewish people in World War II)

Also Batman and Iron Man are definitely super within their own ways.
See Batman's detective skill, intellectual level, fighting skill + Iron Man's intellect and fighting skill.
 

Blaster395

New member
Dec 13, 2009
514
0
0
Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality might interest you, because it clearly states that muggle scientific method has created superior results to anything wizards have done, despite magic having infinitely more potential.
 

TomWiley

New member
Jul 20, 2012
352
0
0
What I dislike about superhero movies is that they always portray the police as; at best, incompetent fools, and at worst, corrupt and evil. Apparently, an armed force with years of tactical training can't do anything right while some dude who just happened to step in radioactive waste, get bit by a spider or be insanely rich is next to flawless.

Not to mention that superheroes always seem to have a mandate to stand above the law, often breaking international laws and violating civil rights because, apparently, only they know what's best for the public. They can't do it because their depicted as stronger and smarter, so obviously they don't have to be bound by silly things like laws and restrictions. That's a horrible message for any movie to convey to it's audience.
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,071
0
0
theheroofaction said:
Alright let me cover this one bit at a time.

The first. the whole point of the genre is a power fantasy, not some horrible propaganda.

Secondly. every comic producing company has several "normal" characters working as equals the abnormally blessed ones. I distinctly remember batman being in the justice league. This is specifically to subvert the whole "ubermensch" thing.

point the third. real life isn't fair. why should fiction be?

Point the fourth.. Most "superhero" comics implicitly if not explicitly are about the types of ways people respond to having power. People need to have power in order for this to work.
agree with all this.

i can't believe the butthurt going on with some of these posts...ironman and batman single handedly destroy "supers" time and time again, hell besides the flash and i think plasticman, doesn't batman have a plan/way to defeat every single super out there?
 

Hagi

New member
Apr 10, 2011
2,739
0
0
Heh, it continues to amuse me to no end how Batman and Iron Man are seen as having no superpowers.

They have the greatest power of them all, plot power. The plot requires them to be equal to those heroes with amazing powers yet at the same time requires them to have no formal superpowers of their own. In the end this means that they're always capable of providing a significant contribution, but lacking a formal description of their superpowers they suffer from no limitations whatsoever.

In just about every Justice League Batman is punched by beings powerful enough to make Superman, someone who's completely immune to bullets, bleed. The worst he usually gets, if anything at all, is a few broken ribs. Those are punches that impact with more force than bullets. The only logical conclusion is that not only does Batman have infinite money, superhuman intelligence but he's also got super toughness.

The exact same thing goes for Iron Man, probably even more so since he seems to frequently crash from extreme heights. The impact of that would kill any normal being, even those wearing metal suits of armor. Those wearing metal suits of armor would only be hurt more. The logical conclusion? Iron Man possesses super toughness.

They've got many more super powers. Their adventures see them do stuff that's completely superhuman every day. Which is completely fine, they're awesome adventures. But those guys are superheroes with superpowers, the power to have whatever superpower the plot demands without actually calling it a superpower.
 

Galletea

Inexplicably Awesome
Sep 27, 2008
2,877
0
0
Generally the whole idea of superheroes is to build them up and then exploit their weaknesses to show them as being very human and vulnerable. I don't really get your reasoning for not liking the idea of superheroes, since it is no more unrealistic than anything else in fiction. Being super strong or able to fly is not that far removed from being super rich and a genius at the same time, or able to craft ridiculous gadgetry, or being incredibly observant.
 

JPArbiter

New member
Oct 14, 2010
337
0
0
Best Super Hero for the OP is Captain America. 'Merica took a weakling Girly Man and made him into the pinnacle of human evolution.

AMERICA MADE IT'S OWN HERO!
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,405
0
0
The reason people like superheroes is egoistic wish fulfilment. When i watch a sueprhero movie i dream of what i woudl do with this power. many others do so as well. Its the reason why Dragon Ball was so popular as well. altrough i guess he technically can be a superhero too.

I dont go gglorifying them, i dont reald the comic books, i dont dress up like one or anything the sort, but i do enjoy watching a good movie with superpowers.
Heck, you dont need superheroes. Watch Chronicle, despite its (actually inventative way) of doing handcam effect, it is essiantely a regular jock turned suerperhero movie. You cant imagine how much im willing to give to be that guy and how differently i would have acted with this power.