irish286 said:
ThatOtherGirl said:
irish286 said:
If actually knew anything about the subject you would know that there is actually some fairly scientifically valid reasons to question the Theory of evolution. But like most people who believe in popular science, you don't know anything and instead of questioning you blindly follow and attack anything that puts your views into question.
I completed a 4 year degree on the subject. What did you do to gain your insight into the subject?
But I'll humor you, can you provide me with this evidence?
For one, the statistical impossibility. Multiple impossibly high odds had to be beaten for life to even happen let alone survive and randomly mutate.
Ok, lets get something straight. The theory of evolution is not a theory of the origin of life. If you want to talk the origin of life that is a different subject. In specific, what you are most likely talking about is called Abiogenesis.
The theory of evolution describes the process by which populations change over time.
And now you have demonstrated the fundamental problem. You don't even know what evolution is and yet you insist that there is significant evidence against it. And you know what? I don't expect random people to understand the distinction there. It is fairly simple, but people have been bombarded over and over from all sides by people simply lying about what the theory actually is.
But if law makers are going to make actual laws specifically naming evolution then they should understand the very first thing about it, starting with what it actually is. And I do not believe for a second they did. They put laws on the books that require teachers to lie in classrooms. That is the problem.
But with that we are getting ridiculously off topic. I will give you the last word, after that if you want to continue this discussion feel free to create another topic or PM me.