I don't get it. Violence, good. Sex, NO NO NO WE CANT HAVE THAT!!!

Recommended Videos

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,994
118
TheLaughingMagician said:
It's because sex makes babies so is therefore just the worst thing ever. You can't punch a baby into someone.

NOT: For the love of god please don't list scenarios where you could punch a baby into someone!
Actually, there is an old myth from...I think the Civil War era in the United States, about a woman (or possibly multiple) women, being impregnated by a bullet. I'm not even kidding. The story being that a man was shot in the balls, and got some of the stored semen on the bullett, which then, amazingly then penetrated the womb of the woman, and got her pregnant. I'm confident, that like the immaculate conception, this was just a story made up by a young, pregnant woman out of wedlock, and grasping at any excuse she could pass off as to why she got pregnant, that didn't involve her being an evil dirty slut who had sex!! So yeah, total bullshit, but the story does exist.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,994
118
TheLaughingMagician said:
Happyninja42 said:
TheLaughingMagician said:
It's because sex makes babies so is therefore just the worst thing ever. You can't punch a baby into someone.

NOT: For the love of god please don't list scenarios where you could punch a baby into someone!
Actually, there is an old myth from...I think the Civil War era in the United States, about a woman (or possibly multiple) women, being impregnated by a bullet. I'm not even kidding. The story being that a man was shot in the balls, and got some of the stored semen on the bullett, which then, amazingly then penetrated the womb of the woman, and got her pregnant. I'm confident, that like the immaculate conception, this was just a story made up by a young, pregnant woman out of wedlock, and grasping at any excuse she could pass off as to why she got pregnant, that didn't involve her being an evil dirty slut who had sex!! So yeah, total bullshit, but the story does exist.
I actually knew that one. Mythbusters did. It was pretty great because it went a lot like your post. The entire time they were testing it they were giving background and different ways it could be possible but then by the end it was just "I mean obviously she just fucked someone though."
Yeah, Mythbusters, that's where I saw that. I knew I saw it somewhere, but couldn't recall what. Though the punch impregnation example makes me think of Fist of the North Star style punching, with the end result being a fully gestated baby. YATATTATATATATATATATATAAAAAA! "You know are bearing twin girls. Your delivery date is in 3 weeks. You are welcome."
 

Synigma

New member
Dec 24, 2014
142
0
0
MarsAtlas said:
*snip*
... Hell, sodomy laws were only struck down thirteen years ago by the federal supreme court and right now we've got a pet adoption bill in Michigan that may very deliberately be trying to criminalize sodomy again*

**Not because the legislature is stupid but because the population is stupid. They typically don't have to justify the legality of an action to somebody who agrees with it.
I just had a friend telling me about this bill and how mad he is about everyone turning it into something it's not. Fact is this stuff has been illegal in Michigan for almost 100 years already, the bill is changing some of the surrounding wording without removing it. The guy trying to get it passed to protect pets (something everyone is in favour of) didn't want to mess with the details and stir up unnecessary trouble (since the human part is already un-constitutional anyway).

Defendants of this part of Logan's Law believed that if striking "with mankind" was part of SB 219, this powerful law aimed at preventing another tragedy like what happened to Logan[footnote]a March, 2012, incident in which a Michigan husky named Logan was blinded and then died after being burnt by acid.[/footnote] would be delayed or even struck down entirely due to the heated nature of discussions about sex.[footnote]Article here: http://www.inquisitr.com/2775741/michigan-was-not-trying-to-ban-sodomy-with-logans-law-it-was-simply-not-un-banning-it/#X6w2bSePQ7dwvUX6.99[/footnote]
That does bring us back to the US being way too hung up on sex though. Or perhaps it's just that they think everyone else is way too hung up on it? Like this guy didn't even want to chance arguing between conservatives over an un-constitutional piece of legislature... but maybe it's just in his head? Maybe it's just in Hollywood's head that people would be so against sex in movies?

Meh, at the end of the day I still blame religion.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,405
0
0
CaitSeith said:
Strazdas said:
CaitSeith said:
You're comparing pears to apples. Violence is too broad, sex is pretty specific. You have to either compare violence and sexuality; or torture and sex.
well thats a very odd choice of example. if you think violence is sexuallity then sex would be equivalent to torture? SO biascally you are saying that sex is the worst part of sexuality?
Not the worst; but the extreme or a practical use. But if you have a better example, you're free to share.
so the practical use of violence is torture? I think a much better practical use of violence would be prevention of something worse to happen. For example the use of violence to defend yourself or others from an attacker. As far as my example goes, heres what i think: Sex is the end object of sexuality, thus we should find equivalent end object of violence here. Thats a bit tricky because violence is used for many reasons, but the msot common trope in media is violence being used to defeat dangerous villians. So sex to sexuality would be as victory to violence.
 

Ikasury

New member
May 15, 2013
297
0
0
https://youtu.be/TKhrQhdxjI8

Sex and Violence by the Exploited

kinda my response to this silliness :D

Ot: because 'murica is a CHRISTIAN NATION! >.< i actually had this discussion with a german friend, she did not understand why Lemons were banned from sites or why troll-wankers would harrass people about written porn when no one else cares... because some people aren't getting any and don't want everyone else getting anything...

plus the whole sad state of our supposed 'sex education', its weird being in a biology class in college and people don't know that sperm meets egg and that's where babies come from... this whole 'hush hush sex is taboo' thing is going to get us all killed...

since obviously thanks to new virtual reality technology we won't be needing 'real' sex anymore and most of us will never interact with another human being again... hooray! our species is doomed! :D

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-e...-put-on-hold-due-to-high-demand-a6855981.html

just saying~

who cares about violence? we're going to die out anyway~ XD
 

___________________

New member
May 20, 2009
303
0
0
The world's governments understood a while back that the media is a powerful endocrination tool. If you show lots of violence people become less prone to violence, less prone to fight, more stable and easily controlable, like livestock. Because they have an escape from violence without having to get into confrontations directly.

By saying sex is bad and demonizing pornography and such, they make it more appealing because it's a no no place. Leading to people's current view on sexuality and long term relationships. Ever wondered why people are more addicted to sex than before? Why relationships don't last? Why women are increasingly objectified and subconsciously want to be objects and can't process love as well as they used to? All that and more leads to men losing interest in a number of things. Society becomes more feminine, much less masculine, no balance. The end result is the world you live in today. Where right is wrong. Where we accept war in other contries complacently, where men act more like women, more passive-aggressivly. Where no one stands up for anything and most people think that waving signs in the air or liking a page on facebook makes a difference.

Eventually producers, developers, directors, whatever, end up doing it because they already think that way so it becomes automatic.

Sounds strange and farfeched doesn't it? Well, it's human nature to copy what you see when you're a baby, so why should that die down when you grow older? It doesn't in most cases. If you were in "power", wouldn't you want to be more in control? Wouldn't you want to subdue people just a tiny little more so they'd be less hectic? So if the option to demonize something through the media presented itself, wouldn't you go for it? So easy, untraceable back to you. Tempting isn't it?


There you go brother. The media is a very easy to use tool for manipulation and a very scary one because it works so well and almost no one notices. Those who do notice aren't many and don't know each other most of the times. And it has been builp up for quit a few decades now. That way of being.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,580
7,223
118
Country
United States
Well, after video games were created, violent crime went down...

#badscience