That wasn't a particularly good example on my part. I might be able to come up with something better if I were actually in his position and/or cared enough. Anyway, humans have written letters (and novels or poems) for quite a long time. I'm pretty sure that they managed without emoticons. As I said, they are not necessary, just very easy and quick to use. I acknowledge that, but that doesn't mean I have to like them.Owyn_Merrilin said:See, when I see "Now I'm really looking forward to the weekend." the period looks like the guy isn't all that excited about it; if you type it as "Now I'm really looking forward to the weekend!" it shows excitement, but it's the kind of excitement that implies cheering, not the kind that shows someone is happy that their girlfriend is coming over. However, if you type it as "Now I'm really looking forward to the weekend =D" the exact mood intended is conveyed in the text.
It doesn't make any sense, but it doesn't have to, because it's not a conscious act, but an association. When you say "water" some people will immediately think of fire, others of ice. Same thing. And I find your answer very confusing. Please don't try to fry my brain.Sure, 12 year olds use emoticons, but when used properly it doesn't have to make you look like one. That's like saying 12 year olds use microphones when playing games online, so anyone using a microphone looks like a 12 year old -- or like saying 12 year olds play videogames, and adults shouldn't, for that matter.
Edit: Also, seeing a smiley face in a post directed at me makes me feel like the writer is trying to mock me. Another weird association.
I just looked that up. It's only applicable in a certain (very specific) context. Very interesting, but not necessarily a hyperbole. But yeah, still wrong.Edit: Also, that 90% figure is a well known case of hyperbole. If it was 90%, written language wouldn't work at all.